flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Top 50 Science + Technology Engineering Firms

Top 50 Science + Technology Engineering Firms

Jacobs, Affiliated Engineers, and Vanderweil Engineers top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest science + technology sector engineering and EA firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.


By BD+C Staff | August 12, 2016

Georgia Institute of Technology, Engineered Biosystems Building, Atlanta, Ga. Cooper Carry (architect), McCarthy Building Companies (GC), Newcomb & Boyd (MEP), Long Engineering (CE). Photo: Chris Cooper courtesy of Cooper Carry.

TOP 50 SCIENCE + TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING FIRMS
Rank Firm 2015 Revenue
1 Jacobs $51,420,000
2 Affiliated Engineers $29,447,000
3 Vanderweil Engineers $21,653,900
4 CRB $10,200,000
5 RMF Engineering $6,285,000
6 Mazzetti $5,199,075
7 Thornton Tomasetti $4,686,534
8 Newcomb & Boyd $3,466,430
9 Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering $3,335,000
10 Global Engineering Solutions $3,275,000
11 BR+A Consulting Engineers $3,000,000
12 Arup $2,352,966
13 Ghafari Associates $2,000,000
14 BSA LifeStructures $1,969,607
15 Syska Hennessy Group $1,750,876
16 Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers $1,667,247
17 Environmental Systems Design $1,571,840
18 Jensen Hughes $1,555,972
19 STV $1,378,299
20 KJWW / TTG $1,365,000
21 RDK Engineers $1,323,231
22 Spectrum Engineers $1,288,746
23 Ross & Baruzzini $1,284,549
24 ThermalTech Engineering $1,250,000
25 Hankins and Anderson $1,230,980
26 Karpinski Engineering $1,100,000
27 Sherlock, Smith & Adams $1,014,000
28 ME Engineers $1,000,000
29 Cardno Haynes Whaley $820,511
30 Pedco E & A Services $765,000
31 Coffman Engineers $698,634
32 I. C. Thomasson Associates $622,000
33 Smith Seckman Reid $511,913
34 P2S Engineering $504,514
35 Glumac $494,360
36 Peter Basso Associates $474,636
37 Bala Consulting Engineers $450,000
38 SSOE Group $390,000
39 dbHMS $384,000
40 Henderson Engineers $326,842
41 William Tao & Associates $315,389
42 Walter P Moore $315,202
43 Stanley Consultants $290,773
44 Highland Associates $220,000
45 KZF Design $216,000
46 JBA Consulting Engineers $131,855
47 H.F. Lenz Company $131,000
48 Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates $100,000
49 CTLGroup $100,000
50 Architectural Engineers $79,964
51 G & W Engineering Corp. $50,013
52 Dunham Associates $50,000

 

RETURN TO THE GIANTS 300 LANDING PAGE

Related Stories

| Jan 3, 2013

Top BIM/VDC articles of 2011-2012

A compendium of BD+Cs top building information modeling and virtual design + construction articles from 2011-12.

| Jan 3, 2013

8 trends shaping today’s senior housing

The ranks of those age 65 and older are swelling by the thousands every day. Is there an opportunity for your firm in the seniors housing market?

| Jan 2, 2013

Trends Report: New facilities enhance the quality of campus life

Colleges and universities are building state-of-the-art student unions, dining halls, and other non-academic buildings to enrich the campus experience, boost enrollment, and stay competitive.

| Jan 2, 2013

M&A activity at U.S. AEC firms up slightly

Total mergers and acquisitions in the AEC industry hit 171 in 2012, up slight from the 169 deals in 2011.

| Jan 2, 2013

BIM market value to hit $6.5 billion by 2020

Sales of BIM software and services are expected to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.3%, to a market value of $6.5 billion in 2020.

| Jan 2, 2013

Construction jobs made gains in 2012, even with a slow Q4, says Gilbane report

The construction sector in the nine states with 50% of construction employment was up 169,000 jobs from February to September 2012, following a lost of 137,000 jobs from September 2011 to January 2012.

| Dec 21, 2012

ABI gains for fourth straight month

Positive business conditions for all building sectors.

| Dec 15, 2012

SAIC makes ready to lay off 700

SAIC, McLean, Va. (2011 construction revenues: $185,390,000), said it plans to cut its workforce by 700 employees in order to remain competitive in the federal market.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category



Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.


halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021