flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Top 50 Science + Technology Engineering Firms

Top 50 Science + Technology Engineering Firms

Jacobs, Affiliated Engineers, and Vanderweil Engineers top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest science + technology sector engineering and EA firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.


By BD+C Staff | August 12, 2016

Georgia Institute of Technology, Engineered Biosystems Building, Atlanta, Ga. Cooper Carry (architect), McCarthy Building Companies (GC), Newcomb & Boyd (MEP), Long Engineering (CE). Photo: Chris Cooper courtesy of Cooper Carry.

TOP 50 SCIENCE + TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING FIRMS
Rank Firm 2015 Revenue
1 Jacobs $51,420,000
2 Affiliated Engineers $29,447,000
3 Vanderweil Engineers $21,653,900
4 CRB $10,200,000
5 RMF Engineering $6,285,000
6 Mazzetti $5,199,075
7 Thornton Tomasetti $4,686,534
8 Newcomb & Boyd $3,466,430
9 Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering $3,335,000
10 Global Engineering Solutions $3,275,000
11 BR+A Consulting Engineers $3,000,000
12 Arup $2,352,966
13 Ghafari Associates $2,000,000
14 BSA LifeStructures $1,969,607
15 Syska Hennessy Group $1,750,876
16 Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers $1,667,247
17 Environmental Systems Design $1,571,840
18 Jensen Hughes $1,555,972
19 STV $1,378,299
20 KJWW / TTG $1,365,000
21 RDK Engineers $1,323,231
22 Spectrum Engineers $1,288,746
23 Ross & Baruzzini $1,284,549
24 ThermalTech Engineering $1,250,000
25 Hankins and Anderson $1,230,980
26 Karpinski Engineering $1,100,000
27 Sherlock, Smith & Adams $1,014,000
28 ME Engineers $1,000,000
29 Cardno Haynes Whaley $820,511
30 Pedco E & A Services $765,000
31 Coffman Engineers $698,634
32 I. C. Thomasson Associates $622,000
33 Smith Seckman Reid $511,913
34 P2S Engineering $504,514
35 Glumac $494,360
36 Peter Basso Associates $474,636
37 Bala Consulting Engineers $450,000
38 SSOE Group $390,000
39 dbHMS $384,000
40 Henderson Engineers $326,842
41 William Tao & Associates $315,389
42 Walter P Moore $315,202
43 Stanley Consultants $290,773
44 Highland Associates $220,000
45 KZF Design $216,000
46 JBA Consulting Engineers $131,855
47 H.F. Lenz Company $131,000
48 Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates $100,000
49 CTLGroup $100,000
50 Architectural Engineers $79,964
51 G & W Engineering Corp. $50,013
52 Dunham Associates $50,000

 

RETURN TO THE GIANTS 300 LANDING PAGE

Related Stories

| Feb 5, 2013

8 eye-popping wood building projects

From 100-foot roof spans to novel reclaimed wood installations, the winners of the 2013 National Wood Design Awards push the envelope in wood design.

| Feb 3, 2013

Electronic surveying improves accuracy on BIM-driven hospital project

A mechanical contractor combines an electronic surveying tool with a BIM model to make significant productivity gains in a large-scale hospital project.

| Feb 3, 2013

Clever engineering helps create design excellence

A mechanical engineering team overcomes numerous hurdles to help make a new federal courthouse in Iowa a showpiece of ‘government work’ at its best.

| Jan 29, 2013

Leigh Mires joins Thornton Tomasetti as chief learning officer

Thornton Tomasetti, the international engineering firm, announces that Leigh Mires has joined the firm in the newly created position of chief learning officer. Ms. Mires, who has more than 20 years of experience, is charged with advancing the firm’s organizational development and training initiatives. She will be based in the firm’s New York headquarters.

| Jan 16, 2013

2013 40 Under 40 application process now open

Building Design+Construction's 40 Under 40 is open to AEC professionals from around the globe.

| Jan 11, 2013

HMC Architects: In their own voices

See what HMC professionals say about their “Best AEC Firm to Work For”

| Jan 10, 2013

Guide predicts strongest, weakest AEC markets for 2013

2013 Guide to U.S. AEC markets touts apartments, natural gas, senior housing and transmission and distribution.

| Jan 3, 2013

Answered prayers

A bold renovation enables a small church to expand its mission on a grand scale.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category



Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.


halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021