flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Feb 14, 2020

At least 13 states create incentives for utilities to use demand response programs

Practice optimizes power grid, incorporates more renewable power.

Codes and Standards | Feb 13, 2020

Living Future Institute’s JUST program helps measure progress on sustainability, social justice

Functions as a transparency platform for organizations to disclose their operations.

Codes and Standards | Feb 12, 2020

Commercial Building Energy Saver Wins R&D 100 Award

Software toolkit enables access to deep energy retrofit and zero-net energy strategies.

Codes and Standards | Feb 11, 2020

Fenestration Rating Council launches faster energy performance testing system

New windows, doors, and skylights will get to market faster.

Codes and Standards | Feb 7, 2020

Landlords scramble to comply with the New York City Council’s Climate Mobilization Act (CMA)

Intent is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; improve efficiency for buildings larger than 25,000 sf.

Codes and Standards | Feb 6, 2020

New document to determine THERM finite element modeling surface temperatures released

Process often used to predict interior surface temperatures on fenestration.

Codes and Standards | Feb 5, 2020

HUD issues guidance on emotional support animals

Clarifies the responsibilities of rental housing providers and renters.

Codes and Standards | Jan 31, 2020

Colorado ranks first in LEED Top 10 states

Rankings of states for LEED certified square feet per person released.

Codes and Standards | Jan 30, 2020

Dramatic demographic shifts poised to alter global workplace

By 2030, Millennials and Generation Z will dominate workforce.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021