flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jan 22, 2020

Potential energy savings from smart meters is largely unrealized

Most utilities underuse the technology that can help customers save money.

Codes and Standards | Jan 21, 2020

Contractors pay practices reviewed in new database

Fastest and slowest paying GCs revealed.

Codes and Standards | Jan 17, 2020

Several states with ambitious climate goals will have to restrict natural gas as a fuel

Buildings would have to heat and cook with electricity.

Codes and Standards | Jan 16, 2020

New solar-ready mandate affects commercial and residential buildings in St. Louis

All new buildings must have reserved rooftop sections for PVs.

Codes and Standards | Jan 14, 2020

L.A.’s expedited permitting process credited with faster approvals on $1 billion project

Parallel Design-Permitting Process includes flagging elements for correction during conceptual design.

Codes and Standards | Jan 13, 2020

Kansas City is first in nation to offer free public transportation

Aim is to increase mobility to spur more economic activity.

Codes and Standards | Jan 9, 2020

Dept. of Defense will require beefed up cybersecurity standards in January

All contractors will have to demonstrate secure practices.

Codes and Standards | Jan 8, 2020

2019 Oregon Zero Energy Ready commercial code will boost efficiency by 14%

ASHRAE 90.1 is the basis for new code that went into effect Oct. 1.

Codes and Standards | Jan 8, 2020

Energy efficiency initiatives have significantly cut energy consumption per square foot

Lighting and space heating fell by more than 600 trillion Btu from 2003 to 2012.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021