flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Mar 20, 2020

Feds prod use of eminent domain to force people out of flood-prone homes

Local officials that don’t comply could lose federal money to combat climate change.

Codes and Standards | Mar 19, 2020

ASHRAE provides COVID-19 resources for operating, maintaining HVAC systems

Includes recently approved position document on Airborne Infectious Diseases.

Codes and Standards | Mar 19, 2020

CaGBC launches new version of its Zero Carbon Building Standard

Version 2 draws on lessons from more than 20 zero carbon projects.

Codes and Standards | Mar 16, 2020

Concrete industry reduces carbon footprint by 13% over five years

Result mostly due to more efficient use of Portland cement.

Resiliency | Mar 13, 2020

Feds push use of eminent domain to force people out of flood-prone homes

Local officials that don’t comply could lose federal money to combat climate change.

Codes and Standards | Mar 12, 2020

Design guide for sloped glazing and skylights updated for first time in 30 years

Helps with choosing proper glass for non-residential applications.

Codes and Standards | Mar 11, 2020

Two tree species native to the Northeast found suitable for CLT

Eastern white pine and eastern hemlock pass strength testing.

Codes and Standards | Mar 10, 2020

Prescient receives ICC certification for seismic resilience system

Technology suitable for buildings up to 12 stories in earthquake-prone areas.

Codes and Standards | Mar 6, 2020

Design firms creating plans to re-imagine D.C.’s tidal basin

Area including National Mall is facing increased flood risk.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021