flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jun 29, 2021

Biden China policy may spur more increased U.S. PV manufacturing capacity

Senate bill proposes advanced solar manufacturing production credit.

Codes and Standards | Jun 28, 2021

Local and state building energy performance standards aim to curb climate change

Owners must up the ante on operations and retrofits.

Codes and Standards | Jun 24, 2021

Biden Administration will restore ‘Waters of the U.S.’ protections ended by Trump

Early revision more likely to hold up in court, says legal expert.

Codes and Standards | Jun 23, 2021

Denver unveils renewable heating and cooling plan

City releases roadmap to decarbonizing existing homes and buildings.

Codes and Standards | Jun 22, 2021

Actually, few companies plan to significantly reduce their office footprint

CBRE survey shows that many firms will continue with hybrid work.

Codes and Standards | Jun 21, 2021

Vancouver, B.C., may delay new zero emissions building standards

Building permit delays may postpone new standards by a year.

Codes and Standards | Jun 17, 2021

Buffalo’s parking reform having noticeable impact on development

Elimination of mandatory parking allotments encourages new projects.

Codes and Standards | Jun 16, 2021

Inconsistent building codes make some states more vulnerable to hurricanes

Florida takes top spot for strongest building code in latest IBHS survey.

Codes and Standards | Jun 15, 2021

Growing housing supply gap will worsen affordability crisis

Supply projected to fall 4.5 million units short in 2022.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021