flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jun 17, 2021

Buffalo’s parking reform having noticeable impact on development

Elimination of mandatory parking allotments encourages new projects.

Codes and Standards | Jun 16, 2021

Inconsistent building codes make some states more vulnerable to hurricanes

Florida takes top spot for strongest building code in latest IBHS survey.

Codes and Standards | Jun 15, 2021

Growing housing supply gap will worsen affordability crisis

Supply projected to fall 4.5 million units short in 2022.

Codes and Standards | Jun 10, 2021

New York City cracks down on construction site safety

Buildings Dept. issues new safety legislation for City Council consideration.

Codes and Standards | Jun 9, 2021

ASHRAE updates health care facility ventilation standard

Includes improved guidance on thermal comfort, revisions to air filtration requirements.

Codes and Standards | Jun 8, 2021

American Wood Council releases new fire design specification

For design of wood members, assemblies, and connections to meet code requirements.

Codes and Standards | Jun 7, 2021

Guide provides strategies to overcome barriers to sustainable affordable housing

International Living Future Institute document helps with social, regulatory, and financial hurdles.

Codes and Standards | Jun 3, 2021

Conversion of large office buildings to residential will require revamped regulations

Post-1960 offices present ventilation, daylighting, and other challenges.

Codes and Standards | Jun 2, 2021

Dept. of Energy releases EnergyPlus and OpenStudio updates

New features include Python Plugin features and additional tabular reporting options.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021