flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jul 21, 2021

Proposal to give Calif. hospitals more time for earthquake retrofits stirs controversy

State hospital association says 2030 deadline should be extended.

Codes and Standards | Jul 20, 2021

New York, New Jersey legislatures may revamp bidding rules to promote low-carbon concrete

Contractors would have to certify that their concrete is in compliance.

Codes and Standards | Jul 19, 2021

Lack of information on carbon emissions challenges construction industry

Reports recommends whole-life carbon assessments on building projects.

Codes and Standards | Jul 15, 2021

Three drywall code-referenced publications have been updated

Include guidance on fire resistance, sound control, application, and finishing.

Codes and Standards | Jul 14, 2021

Biden’s infrastructure proposal includes massive investment in school buildings

‘Once in a lifetime opportunity’ to upgrade HVAC and other key systems.

Codes and Standards | Jul 13, 2021

Reluctance to fund maintenance on older condos is a serious problem

Owner associations defer needed work, putting properties at risk.

Codes and Standards | Jul 12, 2021

Regulations on hydrofluorocarbons reduce roof insulation options

Canada, some U.S. states ban HFC blowing agents used in closed-cell foam.

Codes and Standards | Jul 8, 2021

New York City shuts down 322 construction sites for unsafe conditions

Action comes as inspectors visit more than 2,100 sites.

Codes and Standards | Jul 7, 2021

Bechtel, Nautilus partner on sustainable, high-performance data centers

Facilities would use 70% less power for cooling, eliminate consumption of drinking water.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021