Solar photovoltaic applications in the U.S. continue to grow at an astounding pace, even though the domestic market has tapped only a small portion of the potential PV development.
So far, 2012 has been a strong year for the PV industry, with approximately 2,800 MW of installations projected, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association. The future looks even brighter, with forecasts for PV installations expected to rise at a compound annual growth rate of 30% through 2012.
To compare, the U.S. solar energy industry installed 1,855 MW of photovoltaic solar systems in 2011, representing a 109% increase over 2010. That’s enough to power 370,000 homes. The SEIA reported the fourth quarter of 2011 alone recorded 776 MW of PV systems installed in the U.S., making it the largest installation of photovoltaics for any quarter in PV market history.
Nearly half the installed and planned PV projects in the U.S. are expected to be roof-mounted installations. That’s a scary prospect for roofing product manufacturers and contractors, because an improperly installed PV rack can tear a roof to pieces in no time.
BD+C asked James R. Kirby, Vice President of Sustainability for the Center for Environmental Innovation in Roofing, Washington, D.C., for advice about what Building Teams and building owners should know about roof rack PV systems.
1. DO use the proper flashing techniques for steep-slope roofs.
Because water flows downhill, for steep-slope roofs (which, according to ASTM standard E 1918-97, are roofs in which the uppermost part is installed at a slope of 2:12 or more), proper overlaps during installation are critically important. Commonly used materials for this type of installation are metal flashings with compression gaskets or counterflashing at roof penetrations (or both).
Flashing works because it is located above the level where water drains.
For vertical penetrations, the flashing is the primary weatherproofing element. Counterflashings are secondary and placed above the flashing piece.
7 do’s and don’ts of PV roof rack installation
1. DO use the proper flashing techniques for steep-slope roofs.
2. DO avoid improper flashing techniques for low-slope roofs.
3. DON’T allow for hunt-and-peck pilot holes on steep-slope roofs.
4. DO maintain the roof and PV system after installation.
5. DON’T consider initial payback alone: Factor in life cycle costs.
6. DON’T equate a non-penetrating rack system with zero roof penetrations.
7. DO ask about ballasted rack systems on low-slope roofs and the impact of movement, abrasion, drainage, and wind.
In steep-slope situations where flashing is not feasible or necessary, the counterflashing should extend at least to the nail line of the shingle above. Both methods are acceptable for long-term PV roof rack installation.
“Not all low-slope penetrations use counterflashings, but they all need flashings,” says Kirby. “For steep-slope roofs, it’s a bit different. Shingles basically flash the shingle below by covering up the nails. So if a vertical presentation is attached to a roof, then it needs to be flashed.”
However, in steep-slope roofs, a counterflashing can be inserted under a shingle and over a fastener that’s securing the PV rack.
2. DO avoid improper flashing techniques for low-slope roofs.
For low-slope roofs with little slope to drain, rainwater can pond in low spots or where drainage is interrupted. Drainage can be interrupted by large or wide penetrations or by ballasted PV racks.
It is critical to use flashing that matches the roof’s membrane system. “For low-slope roofs, the flashing material is interfaced with the membrane material, and the materials are not interchangeable,” says Kirby.
Building Teams should support their clients by making sure that the PV contractor incorporates the proper flashing technique for penetrating PV racks.
3. DON’T permit hunt-and-peck pilot holes on steep-slope roofs.
Pilot holes are the number one reason for callbacks for complications after installation. PV installers often use a thin drill bit to locate a rafter in order to position the attachments. Unfortunately, they don’t always repair their “investigation” holes. There are ways to repair these pilot holes, but it’s best not to “hunt-and-peck” in the first place.
“Rafters should be located by observing the eave and ridge,” says Kirby. “Locate nails in the fascia board, which is commonly nailed into the ends of the roof rafters.”
Caution: Vertical stanchions generally require one or two fasteners to be installed into the rafter, not the roof deck, in order to achieve proper pull-out resistance to wind uplift.
4. DO maintain the roof and PV system after installation.
A roof’s chief priority is to keep water and weather out of the building. Therefore, the ability to perform maintenance is critical to the long-term success of a low-slope roof. Certain styles of ballasted PV racks can make it difficult to perform roof maintenance. Some styles must be removed or relocated in order to get to the roof surface for maintenance.
Fortunately, a number of newer rack styles and types that recognize the need for roof maintenance have been developed. “Those styles and types of PV systems will be the long-term success stories in the rooftop PV industry,” says Kirby. “Roof-friendly racking systems are a relatively new trend, and it’s up to the roofing industry to push for more roof-friendly racking systems.”
5. DON’T consider initial payback alone: Factor in life cycle costs.
It’s not easy getting most building owners to think long-term, but Building Teams should counsel clients about the PV investment in the cost per year over the 25- to 30-year life of the roof and the PV system.
According to Kirby, a building owner may expect a relatively short-term payback from the PV system in a certain number of years, but the owner also needs to recognize that the inverter will likely have to be replaced at year 12 or 15.
And what about the cost of a roof replacement if it’s not done at the time of installation? The age of the roof must be considered at the time of PV installation because it’s critical to the long-term success of both the roof and the PV installation.
“A roof that is too old could mean that the PV system may have to be removed along with the old roof,” says Kirby. “If the owner didn’t prepare for the cost, the PV system may not be installed again.”
6. DON’T equate a non-penetrating rack system with zero roof penetrations.
A building owner may be buying a non-penetrating PV rack system, but how do the PV system’s electrical lines get into the building? According to Kirby, the answer is often “through the roof.”
A junction box may be supported by non-penetrating supports; however, this does not eliminate the penetration caused by electrical lines. The entry point for the DC conduit must be properly flashed. Therefore, most if not all PV systems will have at least one penetration.
The same premise is true for both types of non-penetrating systems––adhered and ballasted. It is also important to note that if the PV installation is to occur on a low-slope roof that is under warranty, a contractor recommended by the roofing membrane manufacturer is required in order to keep the warranty from being voided.
7. DO ask about ballasted rack systems on low-slope roofs and impact of movement, abrasion, drainage, and wind.
There are critical questions you should ask the PV contractor prior to installation:
- How does a ballasted PV system rest upon the roof assembly?
- What will happen over time on the rooftop where the ballasted system meets the roof surface?
- Will it collect water and eventually cause weakness?
- Will there be dust or debris between the roof surface and the bottom of the rack?
- Will dust or debris abrade the roof surface over time?
- What measures can be taken to protect the integrity of the roof at the point of contact?
According to Kirby, asking these questions prior to installation is important because any problems that occur may reduce the return on investment to the property owner, while proper installation will keep maintenance costs in check over the life of the rooftop PV system. +
Related Stories
| Nov 29, 2010
Data Centers: Keeping Energy, Security in Check
Power consumption for data centers doubled from 2000 and 2006, and it is anticipated to double again by 2011, making these mission-critical facilities the nation’s largest commercial user of electric power. Major technology companies, notably Hewlett-Packard, Cisco Systems, and International Business Machines, are investing heavily in new data centers. HP, which acquired technology services provider EDS in 2008, announced in June that it would be closing many of its older data centers and would be building new, more highly optimized centers around the world.
| Nov 29, 2010
New Design Concepts for Elementary and Secondary Schools
Hard hit by the economy, new construction in the K-12 sector has slowed considerably over the past year. Yet innovation has continued, along with renovations and expansions. Today, Building Teams are showing a keener focus on sustainable design, as well as ways to improve indoor environmental quality (IEQ), daylighting, and low-maintenance finishes such as flooring.
| Nov 29, 2010
Renovating for Sustainability
Motivated by the prospect of increased property values, reduced utility bills, and an interest in jumping on the sustainability bandwagon, a noted upturn in green building upgrades is helping designers and real estate developers stay busy while waiting for the economy to recover. In fact, many of the larger property management outfits have set up teams to undertake projects seeking LEED for Existing Buildings: Operations & Maintenance (LEED-EBOM, also referred to as LEED-EB), a certification by the U.S. Green Building Council.
| Nov 23, 2010
The George W. Bush Presidential Center, which will house the former president’s library
The George W. Bush Presidential Center, which will house the former president’s library and museum, plus the Bush Institute, is aiming for LEED Platinum. The 226,565-sf center, located at Southern Methodist University, in Dallas, was designed by architect Robert A.M. Stern and landscape architect Michael Van Valkenburgh.
| Nov 23, 2010
Honeywell's School Energy and Environment Survey: 68% of districts delayed or eliminated improvements because of economy
Results of Honeywell's second annual “School Energy and Environment Survey” reveal that almost 90% of school leaders see a direct link between the quality and performance of school facilities, and student achievement. However, districts face several obstacles when it comes to keeping their buildings up to date and well maintained. For example, 68% of school districts have either delayed or eliminated building improvements in response to the economic downturn.
| Nov 16, 2010
Architecture Billings Index: inquiries for new projects remain extremely high
The new projects inquiry index was 61.7, down slightly from a nearly three-year high mark of 62.3 in September, according to the Architecture Billings Index (ABI). However, the ABI dropped nearly two points in October; the October ABI score was 48.7, down from a reading of 50.4 the previous month. The ABI reflects the approximate nine to 12 month lag time between architecture billings and construction spending.
| Nov 16, 2010
Brazil Olympics spurring green construction
Brazil's green building industry will expand in the coming years, spurred by construction of low-impact venues being built for the 2016 Olympics. The International Olympic Committee requires arenas built for the 2016 games in Rio de Janeiro meet international standards for low-carbon emissions and energy efficiency. This has boosted local interest in developing real estate with lower environmental impact than existing buildings. The timing couldn’t be better: the Brazilian government is just beginning its long-term infrastructure expansion program.
| Nov 16, 2010
Green building market grows 50% in two years; Green Outlook 2011 report
The U.S. green building market is up 50% from 2008 to 2010—from $42 billion to $55 billion-$71 billion, according to McGraw-Hill Construction's Green Outlook 2011: Green Trends Driving Growth report. Today, a third of all new nonresidential construction is green; in five years, nonresidential green building activity is expected to triple, representing $120 billion to $145 billion in new construction.
| Nov 16, 2010
Calculating office building performance? Yep, there’s an app for that
123 Zero build is a free tool for calculating the performance of a market-ready carbon-neutral office building design. The app estimates the discounted payback for constructing a zero emissions office building in any U.S. location, including the investment needed for photovoltaics to offset annual carbon emissions, payback calculations, estimated first costs for a highly energy efficient building, photovoltaic costs, discount rates, and user-specified fuel escalation rates.
