flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Two myths regarding NFPA 101 Life Safety Code debunked

Codes and Standards

Two myths regarding NFPA 101 Life Safety Code debunked

NFPA life safety engineer Ron Coté settles the debate over second egress doors and exit signs.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | June 18, 2015
Two myths regarding NFPA 101 Life Safety Code debunked

Image: Pixabay

In Compliance column in the May/June issue of NFPA Journal, Ron Coté, Principal Life Safety Engineer at the National Fire Protection Agency, debunks two myths regarding NFPA 101, Life Safety Code.

The first myth is that all assembly occupancy rooms with an occupancy load more than 50 must have a second egress door. This is not true, although many do have second exit access doors “in order not to violate the common path of travel limitation,” Coté writes.

For most room locations and arrangements, a second exit access door from the room can be positioned to provide occupants with a second travel path. The presence of the second exit access door can reduce what would otherwise be an excessive common path of travel to one that is within the permitted distance.

Coté also debunks the myth that exit signs are required at exits only. The signs are actually required in three locations: at exits, in the exit access, and in exit access corridors of new construction. They are required in the exit access when the exit or way to reach the exit is not readily apparent, as might be the case where additional turns in the egress path are needed to reach an exit.

They may also be needed when in exit access corridors of new construction no point is in excess of the particular sign’s rated viewing distance or the 100-foot (30-meter) default value, whichever is less, from the nearest sign.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Oct 22, 2019

Efficient material design, low-carbon concrete are critical to cutting GHG emissions in construction

Enhancing building utilization and reusing materials also aid carbon reduction.

Codes and Standards | Oct 18, 2019

St. Louis could save $61 million per year in energy costs by improved building performance

GHG gases can be reduced by at least 11% with upgrades to public buildings and large private buildings.

Codes and Standards | Oct 17, 2019

Slow payments cost GCs and subs $64 billion annually

Study finds 51-day average payment turnaround.

Codes and Standards | Oct 16, 2019

Cool pavement can make people hotter

Reflective coatings channel sunlight raising temperatures where pedestrians walk.

Codes and Standards | Oct 15, 2019

Utah adopts 2018 International Energy Conservation Code

Provisions include increased building envelope performance and reduced air infiltration.

Codes and Standards | Oct 14, 2019

States continue to beef up energy efficiency codes

ACEEE 50-state scorecard finds latest IECC code gaining adherents.

Codes and Standards | Oct 9, 2019

DOE releases Better Buildings Healthcare Financing Primer

Outlines financial strategies to implement energy-efficiency projects in healthcare.

Codes and Standards | Oct 8, 2019

Zero Carbon Buildings for All aims for ambitious emission reduction targets

Organization makes commitment to net zero carbon for all buildings by 2050.

Codes and Standards | Oct 7, 2019

Tailgating remains a critical building security threat, say security professionals

Few buildings provide beefed up provisions to counteract threat.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021