flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Two myths regarding NFPA 101 Life Safety Code debunked

Codes and Standards

Two myths regarding NFPA 101 Life Safety Code debunked

NFPA life safety engineer Ron Coté settles the debate over second egress doors and exit signs.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | June 18, 2015
Two myths regarding NFPA 101 Life Safety Code debunked

Image: Pixabay

In Compliance column in the May/June issue of NFPA Journal, Ron Coté, Principal Life Safety Engineer at the National Fire Protection Agency, debunks two myths regarding NFPA 101, Life Safety Code.

The first myth is that all assembly occupancy rooms with an occupancy load more than 50 must have a second egress door. This is not true, although many do have second exit access doors “in order not to violate the common path of travel limitation,” Coté writes.

For most room locations and arrangements, a second exit access door from the room can be positioned to provide occupants with a second travel path. The presence of the second exit access door can reduce what would otherwise be an excessive common path of travel to one that is within the permitted distance.

Coté also debunks the myth that exit signs are required at exits only. The signs are actually required in three locations: at exits, in the exit access, and in exit access corridors of new construction. They are required in the exit access when the exit or way to reach the exit is not readily apparent, as might be the case where additional turns in the egress path are needed to reach an exit.

They may also be needed when in exit access corridors of new construction no point is in excess of the particular sign’s rated viewing distance or the 100-foot (30-meter) default value, whichever is less, from the nearest sign.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | May 25, 2021

International Energy Agency lays out roadmap to net zero

Focus is on energy generation, but building efficiency also plays a role.

Codes and Standards | May 24, 2021

Biden Administration will make new investments in building energy efficiency

Focus on grid-interactive buildings; Energy Star expansion; new targets for energy, water reduction.

Codes and Standards | May 20, 2021

Solar panel trade group issues guidelines to rid use of components built with forced labor

Growing concern that PV industry is dependent on work camps in China.

Codes and Standards | May 19, 2021

Smart electric panels can aid transition to renewable energy

Allow customers better control of circuits; utilities can better manage demand.

Codes and Standards | May 18, 2021

Cross-laminated timber performs better than expected in shear test

Tests conducted in support of new criteria for design of CLT diaphragm.

Codes and Standards | May 13, 2021

LEED-certified federal buildings don’t use less energy than average

May be due to trade-offs on how score is developed.

Codes and Standards | May 12, 2021

White paper examines how to reduce pathogen transmission in ventilation

Pressure barriers and airflow distribution can be effective in existing buildings.

Codes and Standards | May 11, 2021

Pressure builds on White House to rein in cost of lumber

Spike in prices has added nearly $36,000 to price of average new home.

Codes and Standards | May 11, 2021

Residential codes should be upgraded to protect from cooking pollutants

Report examines ventilation standards, calls for increased public awareness of issue.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021