flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Two myths regarding NFPA 101 Life Safety Code debunked

Codes and Standards

Two myths regarding NFPA 101 Life Safety Code debunked

NFPA life safety engineer Ron Coté settles the debate over second egress doors and exit signs.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | June 18, 2015
Two myths regarding NFPA 101 Life Safety Code debunked

Image: Pixabay

In Compliance column in the May/June issue of NFPA Journal, Ron Coté, Principal Life Safety Engineer at the National Fire Protection Agency, debunks two myths regarding NFPA 101, Life Safety Code.

The first myth is that all assembly occupancy rooms with an occupancy load more than 50 must have a second egress door. This is not true, although many do have second exit access doors “in order not to violate the common path of travel limitation,” Coté writes.

For most room locations and arrangements, a second exit access door from the room can be positioned to provide occupants with a second travel path. The presence of the second exit access door can reduce what would otherwise be an excessive common path of travel to one that is within the permitted distance.

Coté also debunks the myth that exit signs are required at exits only. The signs are actually required in three locations: at exits, in the exit access, and in exit access corridors of new construction. They are required in the exit access when the exit or way to reach the exit is not readily apparent, as might be the case where additional turns in the egress path are needed to reach an exit.

They may also be needed when in exit access corridors of new construction no point is in excess of the particular sign’s rated viewing distance or the 100-foot (30-meter) default value, whichever is less, from the nearest sign.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jul 7, 2021

Surfside condo collapse could spur new legislation

Natl. Institute of Standards and Technology is investigating.

Codes and Standards | Jul 7, 2021

Intl. Code Council appoints committees to lead energy code development

One-third of appointees are government regulators.

Codes and Standards | Jul 1, 2021

COVID-19 made payment delays to contractors much worse

Only one in ten companies is always getting paid in full.

Codes and Standards | Jun 30, 2021

New resource for public sector organizations to develop energy data management program

Dept. of Energy document contains more than 30 examples of successful implementations.

Codes and Standards | Jun 29, 2021

Biden China policy may spur more increased U.S. PV manufacturing capacity

Senate bill proposes advanced solar manufacturing production credit.

Codes and Standards | Jun 28, 2021

Local and state building energy performance standards aim to curb climate change

Owners must up the ante on operations and retrofits.

Codes and Standards | Jun 24, 2021

Biden Administration will restore ‘Waters of the U.S.’ protections ended by Trump

Early revision more likely to hold up in court, says legal expert.

Codes and Standards | Jun 23, 2021

Denver unveils renewable heating and cooling plan

City releases roadmap to decarbonizing existing homes and buildings.

Codes and Standards | Jun 22, 2021

Actually, few companies plan to significantly reduce their office footprint

CBRE survey shows that many firms will continue with hybrid work.

Codes and Standards | Jun 21, 2021

Vancouver, B.C., may delay new zero emissions building standards

Building permit delays may postpone new standards by a year.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021