flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Scan, Deconstruct, Rebuild

Scan, Deconstruct, Rebuild

How laser scanning helped improve construction schedules, plans, and final designs for a major reconstruction project.


By By Tim Gregorski, Senior Editor | September 12, 2011
During the design phase, the laser scanning technology allowed the Building Team to reduce the number of hours in the field.
This article first appeared in the September 2011 issue of BD+C.

 

SSOE Group, an international engineering, procurement, and construction management firm headquartered in Toledo, Ohio, recently completed the reconstruction of two Ford Motor Co. plants. The key to the project’s success was the use of new laser scanning technology that allowed the SSOE-led Building Team to capture untold millions of data points for integration into the 3D design model, thereby saving the client significant amounts of time and money.
Ford determined the two plants had exceeded their designed lifespans and opted to reconstruct and upgrade them rather than build new. All members of the Building Team—SSOE, laser-scanning vendor Troy Design & Manufacturing, Redford, Mich., Walbridge Construction Co., Detroit, and UK software developer Pointools Ltd.—had prior experience with laser scanning technology on smaller projects. What was daunting about these projects was the sheer size, totaling about 200,000 sf.
“Ford wanted us to work within their ‘as constructed’ environments, meaning we would be designing inside existing structures that needed to be cleared of old equipment,” says Joe Gerweck, project manager for SSOE Group.
Ford also required the Building Team to work with point cloud technology to reduce the number of construction coordination conflicts. To create the data points, the Building Team used a 3D laser scanner to capture the point clouds of existing equipment and construction in the plants.

LET THE TROUBLESHOOTING BEGIN!
Once the Building Team was defined, SSOE was tasked as the model integrator during the bid and construction phases to ensure the proper utilization of the 3D models and laser scans. This involved confirming software compatibility between subcontractors supplying 3D elements and collaborating the design intent, construction models, and laser scans.
Much to the surprise of the Building Team, there were few problems regarding software compatibility between the members of the Building Team.
“As with any new endeavor, there are always compatibility issues that need to be identified and resolved,” says Gerweck, who notes that, because point cloud technology and the supporting software are still in their infancy, there is no standard that exists between the technology vendors. “This limits the compatibility some, but it was not to the detriment of the Ford projects,” he says.
Having sidestepped the software compatibility problem, the next step for the Building Team was to scan the two manufacturing plants. This represented the most critical aspect of the job because these scanned data points would be used to compare and coordinate with new construction designs.
Traditional scanning methods and equipment were utilized for both Ford reconstruction projects. According to Neil Wakeman, SSOE Group’s BIM/CAD technical leader, stationary laser scanners on tripods were strategically mapped to encompass an area depending on the density or detail requested by the design engineers. The resulting data points were then imported into manageable files per building bay. The point clouds were then cleaned up and ultimately became the basic content used to create the reconstruction designs.
Architectural drawings utilized screen shots of the laser scans to identify elements for demolition versus elements that were to be reproduced in CAD. When using CAD, it is up to the user to interpret what they see on the screen, and identify it as a real world object such as a beam or column.
The laser scanning process, from on-site scanning to cleaning and organizing the raw scans into manageable files for the Building Team, was utilized during all phases of construction. This allowed improvements to the construction schedule, preplanning, and final design conducted by the Building Team both in the field and in the office.

LESSONS LEARNED ABOUT WORKING REMOTELY
Following the scans, the data was then integrated within the 3D modeling software, providing the Building Team with both a visual reference and actual reference to locate points in the 3D digital space. The result was the basis of the designs for updating the two Ford facilities. The entire Building Team was able to virtually see the design intent models, fabrication models, and laser scans overlaid in Navisworks for discussion before anything was assembled in the field.
Once the data points from the scans were transferred to the 3D modeling environment, the Building Team now had the capability to measure points and elevations virtually from a remote office during reconstruction. The scans from the Ford facilities were also used to coordinate the new utility layout with the existing utilities for such systems as HVAC, compressed air piping, coolant piping, domestic water piping, steam piping, electrical bus ducts, and electric cable tray. This resulted in a reduction of the number of hours the Building Team spent in the field verifying existing site conditions.
“The laser scanning technology was very effective,” says Gerweck. “During the design phase, it was much more efficient to review the laser scan results than to travel many hours to verify field conditions.”
Although having the laser scans reduced the number of overall trips to the job sites, thereby saving the client money in the long run, some site visits were still unavoidable. “It’s always beneficial for the Building Team to visit the site because there are instances where the laser scan does not fully describe the actual site condition based upon where the tripod was located for the scan,” says Gerweck.
During the laser scanning process, the Building Team learned another valuable lesson—that rescanning the buildings after the manufacturing equipment was removed proved to be much more efficient and accurate than editing the point clouds by hand to reflect the conditions prior to the new design. Wakeman says SSOE will be certain to incorporate this bit of wisdom into future scanning projects.
Perhaps the most important lesson from this case study is that, while the learning curve associated with new technology can be intimidating, once the Building Team is on same page technologically, the result can save a client significant time and money, thus benefiting everyone involved in the project. BD+C

Related Stories

Sponsored | Steel Buildings | Nov 7, 2022

Steel structures offer faster path to climate benefits

Faster delivery of buildings isn’t always associated with sustainability benefits or long-term value, but things are changing. An instructive case is in the development of steel structures that not only allow speedier erection times, but also can reduce embodied carbon and create durable, highly resilient building approaches.

Mass Timber | Aug 30, 2022

Mass timber construction in 2022: From fringe to mainstream

Two Timberlab executives discuss the market for mass timber construction and their company's marketing and manufacturing strategies. Sam Dicke, Business Development Manager, and Erica Spiritos, Director of Preconstruction, Timberlab, speak with BD+C's John Caulfield. 

Green | Jul 26, 2022

Climate tech startup BlocPower looks to electrify, decarbonize the nation's buildings

The New York-based climate technology company electrifies and decarbonizes buildings—more than 1,200 of them so far.

Building Technology | Jun 9, 2022

GSA Green Proving Ground program selects six innovative building technologies for evaluation

The U.S. General Services Administration’s (GSA) Green Proving Ground program, in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Energy, has selected six innovative building technologies for evaluation in GSA’s inventory.

Smart Buildings | Jun 1, 2022

Taking full advantage of smart building technology

Drew Deatherage of Crux Solutions discusses where owners and AEC firms could do better at optimizing smart technology in building design and operations.

Sponsored | BD+C University Course | May 10, 2022

Design guide for parapets: Safety, continuity, and the building code

This course covers design considerations for parapets. The modern parapet must provide fire protection, serve as a fall-protective guard, transition and protect the roof/facade interface, conceal rooftop equipment, and contribute to the aesthetic character of the building. 

Sponsored | BD+C University Course | May 10, 2022

Designing smarter places of learning

This course explains the how structural steel building systems are suited to construction of education facilities.

Concrete Technology | Apr 19, 2022

SGH’s Applied Science & Research Center achieves ISO 17025 accreditation for concrete testing procedures

Simpson Gumpertz & Heger’s (SGH) Applied Science & Research Center recently received ISO/IEC17025 accreditation from the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) for several concrete testing methods.

Sponsored | BD+C University Course | Apr 19, 2022

Multi-story building systems and selection criteria

This course outlines the attributes, functions, benefits, limits, and acoustic qualities of composite deck slabs. It reviews the three primary types of composite systems that represent the full range of long-span composite floor systems and examines the criteria for their selection, design, and engineering.

Wood | Apr 13, 2022

Mass timber: Multifamily’s next big building system

Mass timber construction experts offer advice on how to use prefabricated wood systems to help you reach for the heights with your next apartment or condominium project. 

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




Contractors

Contractors expect to spend more time on prefabrication, according to FMI study

Get ready for a surge in prefabrication activity by contractors. FMI, the consulting and investment banking firm, recently polled contractors about how much time they were spending, in craft labor hours, on prefabrication for construction projects. More than 250 contractors participated in the survey, and the average response to that question was 18%. More revealing, however, was the participants’ anticipation that craft hours dedicated to prefab would essentially double, to 34%, within the next five years.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021