flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Scan, Deconstruct, Rebuild

Scan, Deconstruct, Rebuild

How laser scanning helped improve construction schedules, plans, and final designs for a major reconstruction project.


By By Tim Gregorski, Senior Editor | September 12, 2011
During the design phase, the laser scanning technology allowed the Building Team to reduce the number of hours in the field.
This article first appeared in the September 2011 issue of BD+C.

 

SSOE Group, an international engineering, procurement, and construction management firm headquartered in Toledo, Ohio, recently completed the reconstruction of two Ford Motor Co. plants. The key to the project’s success was the use of new laser scanning technology that allowed the SSOE-led Building Team to capture untold millions of data points for integration into the 3D design model, thereby saving the client significant amounts of time and money.
Ford determined the two plants had exceeded their designed lifespans and opted to reconstruct and upgrade them rather than build new. All members of the Building Team—SSOE, laser-scanning vendor Troy Design & Manufacturing, Redford, Mich., Walbridge Construction Co., Detroit, and UK software developer Pointools Ltd.—had prior experience with laser scanning technology on smaller projects. What was daunting about these projects was the sheer size, totaling about 200,000 sf.
“Ford wanted us to work within their ‘as constructed’ environments, meaning we would be designing inside existing structures that needed to be cleared of old equipment,” says Joe Gerweck, project manager for SSOE Group.
Ford also required the Building Team to work with point cloud technology to reduce the number of construction coordination conflicts. To create the data points, the Building Team used a 3D laser scanner to capture the point clouds of existing equipment and construction in the plants.

LET THE TROUBLESHOOTING BEGIN!
Once the Building Team was defined, SSOE was tasked as the model integrator during the bid and construction phases to ensure the proper utilization of the 3D models and laser scans. This involved confirming software compatibility between subcontractors supplying 3D elements and collaborating the design intent, construction models, and laser scans.
Much to the surprise of the Building Team, there were few problems regarding software compatibility between the members of the Building Team.
“As with any new endeavor, there are always compatibility issues that need to be identified and resolved,” says Gerweck, who notes that, because point cloud technology and the supporting software are still in their infancy, there is no standard that exists between the technology vendors. “This limits the compatibility some, but it was not to the detriment of the Ford projects,” he says.
Having sidestepped the software compatibility problem, the next step for the Building Team was to scan the two manufacturing plants. This represented the most critical aspect of the job because these scanned data points would be used to compare and coordinate with new construction designs.
Traditional scanning methods and equipment were utilized for both Ford reconstruction projects. According to Neil Wakeman, SSOE Group’s BIM/CAD technical leader, stationary laser scanners on tripods were strategically mapped to encompass an area depending on the density or detail requested by the design engineers. The resulting data points were then imported into manageable files per building bay. The point clouds were then cleaned up and ultimately became the basic content used to create the reconstruction designs.
Architectural drawings utilized screen shots of the laser scans to identify elements for demolition versus elements that were to be reproduced in CAD. When using CAD, it is up to the user to interpret what they see on the screen, and identify it as a real world object such as a beam or column.
The laser scanning process, from on-site scanning to cleaning and organizing the raw scans into manageable files for the Building Team, was utilized during all phases of construction. This allowed improvements to the construction schedule, preplanning, and final design conducted by the Building Team both in the field and in the office.

LESSONS LEARNED ABOUT WORKING REMOTELY
Following the scans, the data was then integrated within the 3D modeling software, providing the Building Team with both a visual reference and actual reference to locate points in the 3D digital space. The result was the basis of the designs for updating the two Ford facilities. The entire Building Team was able to virtually see the design intent models, fabrication models, and laser scans overlaid in Navisworks for discussion before anything was assembled in the field.
Once the data points from the scans were transferred to the 3D modeling environment, the Building Team now had the capability to measure points and elevations virtually from a remote office during reconstruction. The scans from the Ford facilities were also used to coordinate the new utility layout with the existing utilities for such systems as HVAC, compressed air piping, coolant piping, domestic water piping, steam piping, electrical bus ducts, and electric cable tray. This resulted in a reduction of the number of hours the Building Team spent in the field verifying existing site conditions.
“The laser scanning technology was very effective,” says Gerweck. “During the design phase, it was much more efficient to review the laser scan results than to travel many hours to verify field conditions.”
Although having the laser scans reduced the number of overall trips to the job sites, thereby saving the client money in the long run, some site visits were still unavoidable. “It’s always beneficial for the Building Team to visit the site because there are instances where the laser scan does not fully describe the actual site condition based upon where the tripod was located for the scan,” says Gerweck.
During the laser scanning process, the Building Team learned another valuable lesson—that rescanning the buildings after the manufacturing equipment was removed proved to be much more efficient and accurate than editing the point clouds by hand to reflect the conditions prior to the new design. Wakeman says SSOE will be certain to incorporate this bit of wisdom into future scanning projects.
Perhaps the most important lesson from this case study is that, while the learning curve associated with new technology can be intimidating, once the Building Team is on same page technologically, the result can save a client significant time and money, thus benefiting everyone involved in the project. BD+C

Related Stories

Building Technology | Apr 24, 2023

Let’s chat about AI: How design and construction firms are using ChatGPT

Tech-savvy AEC firms that already use artificial intelligence to enhance their work view the startling evolution of ChatGPT mostly in a positive light as a potential tool for sharing information and training employees and trade partners. However, the efficacy of ChatGPT is likely to rest on the construction industry’s aggregation of quality data that, until recently, has been underwhelming for getting the greatest bang from AI and machine learning.

Design Innovation Report | Apr 19, 2023

HDR uses artificial intelligence tools to help design a vital health clinic in India

Architects from HDR worked pro bono with iKure, a technology-centric healthcare provider, to build a healthcare clinic in rural India.

3D Printing | Apr 11, 2023

University of Michigan’s DART Laboratory unveils Shell Wall—a concrete wall that’s lightweight and freeform 3D printed 

The University of Michigan’s DART Laboratory has unveiled a new product called Shell Wall—which the organization describes as the first lightweight, freeform 3D printed and structurally reinforced concrete wall. The innovative product leverages DART Laboratory’s research and development on the use of 3D-printing technology to build structures that require less concrete. 

Contractors | Apr 10, 2023

What makes prefabrication work? Factors every construction project should consider

There are many factors requiring careful consideration when determining whether a project is a good fit for prefabrication. JE Dunn’s Brian Burkett breaks down the most important considerations. 

Smart Buildings | Apr 7, 2023

Carnegie Mellon University's research on advanced building sensors provokes heated controversy

A research project to test next-generation building sensors at Carnegie Mellon University provoked intense debate over the privacy implications of widespread deployment of the devices in a new 90,000-sf building. The light-switch-size devices, capable of measuring 12 types of data including motion and sound, were mounted in more than 300 locations throughout the building.

Cladding and Facade Systems | Apr 5, 2023

Façade innovation: University of Stuttgart tests a ‘saturated building skin’ for lessening heat islands

HydroSKIN is a façade made with textiles that stores rainwater and uses it later to cool hot building exteriors. The façade innovation consists of an external, multilayered 3D textile that acts as a water collector and evaporator. 

Project + Process Innovation | Mar 22, 2023

Onsite prefabrication for healthcare construction: It's more than a process, it's a partnership

Prefabrication can help project teams navigate an uncertain market. GBBN's Mickey LeRoy, AIA, ACHA, LEED AP, explains the difference between onsite and offsite prefabrication methods for healthcare construction projects.

Building Tech | Mar 14, 2023

Reaping the benefits of offsite construction, with ICC's Ryan Colker    

Ryan Colker, VP of Innovation at the International Code Council, discusses how municipal regulations and inspections are keeping up with the expansion of off-site manufacturing for commercial construction. Colker speaks with BD+C's John Caulfield.

Student Housing | Mar 13, 2023

University of Oklahoma, Missouri S&T add storm-safe spaces in student housing buildings for tornado protection

More universities are incorporating reinforced rooms in student housing designs to provide an extra layer of protection for students. Storm shelters have been included in recent KWK Architects-designed university projects in the Great Plains where there is a high incidence of tornadoes. Projects include Headington and Dunham Residential Colleges at the University of Oklahoma and the University Commons residential complex at Missouri S&T.

AEC Innovators | Mar 3, 2023

Meet BD+C's 2023 AEC Innovators

More than ever, AEC firms and their suppliers are wedding innovation with corporate responsibility. How they are addressing climate change usually gets the headlines. But as the following articles in our AEC Innovators package chronicle, companies are attempting to make an impact as well on the integrity of their supply chains, the reduction of construction waste, and answering calls for more affordable housing and homeless shelters. As often as not, these companies are partnering with municipalities and nonprofit interest groups to help guide their production.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




Contractors

Contractors expect to spend more time on prefabrication, according to FMI study

Get ready for a surge in prefabrication activity by contractors. FMI, the consulting and investment banking firm, recently polled contractors about how much time they were spending, in craft labor hours, on prefabrication for construction projects. More than 250 contractors participated in the survey, and the average response to that question was 18%. More revealing, however, was the participants’ anticipation that craft hours dedicated to prefab would essentially double, to 34%, within the next five years.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021