Top Science and Technology Sector Architecture Firms
| Rank | Company | 2013 S&T Sector Revenue |
| 1 | HDR | $55,700,000 |
| 2 | HOK | $50,260,857 |
| 3 | Stantec | $46,654,078 |
| 4 | Flad Architects | $38,940,000 |
| 5 | Perkins+will | $37,475,908 |
| 6 | Payette | $30,980,610 |
| 7 | SmithGroupJJR | $19,384,285 |
| 8 | EwingCole | $12,175,000 |
| 9 | ZGF Architects | $10,606,469 |
| 10 | Harley Ellis Devereaux | $9,340,000 |
| 11 | Ennead Architects | $6,158,951 |
| 12 | Kirksey | $5,138,330 |
| 13 | RS&H | $4,900,000 |
| 14 | NBBJ | $4,582,000 |
| 15 | Hastings+Chivetta Architects | $3,874,537 |
| 16 | RTKL Associates | $3,488,000 |
| 17 | Perkins Eastman | $3,100,000 |
| 18 | BSA LifeStructures | $2,854,789 |
| 19 | Clark Nexsen | $2,673,019 |
| 20 | Lord Aeck Sargent | $2,186,460 |
| 21 | HKS | $2,138,731 |
| 22 | EYP Architecture & Engineering | $2,000,000 |
| 23 | Shepley Bulfinch | $1,770,000 |
| 24 | Emersion Design | $1,726,902 |
| 25 | Bergmann Associates | $1,700,000 |
| 26 | Gensler | $1,644,004 |
| 27 | Ballinger | $1,608,659 |
| 28 | WHR Architects | $1,560,060 |
| 29 | Solomon Cordwell Buenz | $1,500,000 |
| 30 | Ware Malcomb | $1,449,500 |
| 31 | Hammel, Green and Abrahamson | $1,399,297 |
| 32 | Symmes Maini & McKee Associates | $1,290,000 |
| 33 | Page | $1,250,000 |
| 34 | NORR | $1,037,901 |
| 35 | FKP Architects | $1,000,000 |
| 36 | Francis Cauffman | $794,987 |
| 37 | VOA Associates | $794,232 |
| 38 | Heery International | $791,990 |
| 39 | Cooper Carry | $755,279 |
| 40 | DesignGroup | $676,860 |
| 41 | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill | $578,240 |
| 42 | RSP Architects | $552,000 |
| 43 | Swanke Hayden Connell Architects | $545,000 |
| 44 | Epstein | $506,000 |
| 45 | Wilson Architects | $500,000 |
| 46 | S/L/A/M Collaborative, The | $495,535 |
| 47 | Nelson | $404,850 |
| 48 | CTA Architects Engineers | $306,754 |
| 49 | JRS Architect | $145,000 |
| 50 | Harvard Jolly Architecture | $120,530 |
| 51 | Margulies Perruzzi Architects | $119,521 |
| 52 | KZF Design | $71,077 |
| 53 | Commonwealth Architects | $69,580 |
| 54 | Baskervill | $41,280 |
| 55 | Little | $33,876 |
| 56 | NAC|Architecture | $17,236 |
| 57 | Ratio Architects | $1,379 |
Top Science and Technology Sector Engineering Firms
| Rank | Company | 2013 S&T Sector Revenue |
| 1 | Affiliated Engineers | $28,609,000 |
| 2 | URS Corp. | $15,213,288 |
| 3 | WSP Group | $13,550,000 |
| 4 | Jacobs | $10,760,000 |
| 5 | Vanderweil Engineers | $9,556,500 |
| 6 | RMF Engineering | $8,900,000 |
| 7 | CRB | $8,200,000 |
| 8 | Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor | $5,200,000 |
| 9 | BR+A Consulting Engineers | $4,600,000 |
| 10 | Degenkolb Engineers | $4,476,429 |
| 11 | CCRD Partners | $3,530,000 |
| 12 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $3,479,323 |
| 13 | Mazzetti | $3,044,920 |
| 14 | Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering | $3,000,000 |
| 15 | RDK Engineers | $2,830,000 |
| 16 | M-E Engineers | $1,931,000 |
| 17 | Newcomb & Boyd | $1,831,915 |
| 18 | SSOE Group | $1,765,501 |
| 19 | Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corp. | $1,500,000 |
| 20 | Environmental Systems Design | $1,355,590 |
| 21 | STV | $1,114,000 |
| 22 | Glumac | $1,077,171 |
| 23 | Syska Hennessy Group | $985,040 |
| 24 | Karpinski Engineering | $868,633 |
| 25 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | $800,000 |
| 26 | AKF Group | $740,000 |
| 27 | P2S Engineering | $445,624 |
| 28 | KJWW Engineering Consultants | $385,407 |
| 29 | Interface Engineering | $348,341 |
| 30 | Coffman Engineers | $279,999 |
| 31 | Dunham Associates | $250,000 |
| 32 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $239,313 |
| 33 | Henderson Engineers | $219,691 |
| 34 | Thornton Tomasetti | $213,485 |
| 35 | H.F. Lenz | $211,000 |
| 36 | I. C. Thomasson Associates | $200,000 |
| 37 | OLA Consulting Engineers | $184,800 |
| 38 | Davis, Bowen & Friedel | $174,710 |
| 39 | Allen & Shariff | $128,000 |
| 40 | Spectrum Engineers | $126,582 |
| 41 | TTG | $124,162 |
| 42 | CJL Engineering | $122,500 |
| 43 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | $110,000 |
| 44 | Sparling | $107,790 |
| 45 | Wick Fisher White | $74,325 |
| 46 | Guernsey | $58,515 |
| 47 | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | $50,243 |
| 48 | French & Parrello Associates | $50,000 |
| 49 | Apogee Consulting Group | $42,320 |
| 50 | Walter P Moore and Associates | $41,790 |
| 51 | Zak Companies | $17,283 |
| 52 | Heapy Engineering | $14,759 |
| 53 | Brinjac Engineering | $8,704 |
Top Science and Technology Sector Construction Firms
| Rank | Company | 2013 S&T Sector Revenue |
| 1 | Skanska USA | $567,520,664 |
| 2 | DPR Construction | $269,947,839 |
| 3 | Turner Construction | $205,000,000 |
| 4 | Suffolk Construction | $164,816,499 |
| 5 | JE Dunn Construction | $162,998,885 |
| 6 | Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., The | $144,884,163 |
| 7 | Structure Tone | $92,170,000 |
| 8 | Kraus-Anderson Construction | $75,000,000 |
| 9 | Consigli Construction | $70,990,917 |
| 10 | Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction | $44,180,000 |
| 11 | Choate Construction | $38,400,718 |
| 12 | Manhattan Construction | $36,800,000 |
| 13 | LeChase Construction Services | $32,800,000 |
| 14 | McCarthy Holdings | $32,000,000 |
| 15 | Hill & Wilkinson | $30,263,000 |
| 16 | Hensel Phelps | $30,090,000 |
| 17 | McGough | $24,000,000 |
| 18 | Flintco | $14,250,000 |
| 19 | Alberici Constructors | $10,407,230 |
| 20 | S. M. Wilson & Co. | $10,383,344 |
| 21 | E.W. Howell | $9,541,000 |
| 22 | Hill International | $9,000,000 |
| 23 | Fortis Construction | $7,700,000 |
| 24 | Hoar Construction | $6,050,000 |
| 25 | Shawmut Design and Construction | $5,000,000 |
| 26 | HITT Contracting | $4,200,000 |
| 27 | Messer Construction | $3,491,416 |
| 28 | Tutor Perini Corp. | $3,447,967 |
| 29 | James G. Davis Construction | $2,884,634 |
| 30 | Stalco Construction | $2,602,000 |
| 31 | O'Neil Industries/W.E. O'Neil | $1,820,063 |
| 32 | BlueScope Construction | $1,555,063 |
| 33 | Coakley & Williams Construction | $1,514,454 |
| 34 | STV | $1,114,000 |
| 35 | Heery International | $791,990 |
| 36 | Bomel Construction | $578,354 |
| 37 | Weitz Company, The | $215,744 |
| 38 | JLL | $172,953 |
| 39 | W. M. Jordan Company | $171,674 |
| 40 | Allen & Shariff | $128,000 |
| 41 | Austin Commercial | $60,044 |
Read BD+C's full 2014 Giants 300 Report
Related Stories
K-12 Schools | Mar 6, 2023
Benefitting kids through human-centric high school design
Ingrid Krueger, AIA, LEED AP, shares why empathetic, well-designed spaces are critical in high schools.
Adaptive Reuse | Mar 5, 2023
Pittsburgh offers funds for office-to-residential conversions
The City of Pittsburgh’s redevelopment agency is accepting applications for funding from developers on projects to convert office buildings into affordable housing. The city’s goals are to improve downtown vitality, make better use of underutilized and vacant commercial office space, and alleviate a housing shortage.
Student Housing | Mar 5, 2023
Calif. governor Gavin Newsom seeks to reform environmental law used to block student housing
California Gov. Gavin Newsom wants to reform a landmark state environmental law that he says was weaponized by wealthy homeowners to block badly needed housing for students at the University of California, Berkeley.
Green Renovation | Mar 5, 2023
Dept. of Energy offers $22 million for energy efficiency and building electrification upgrades
The Buildings Upgrade Prize (Buildings UP) sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy is offering more than $22 million in cash prizes and technical assistance to teams across America. Prize recipients will be selected based on their ideas to accelerate widespread, equitable energy efficiency and building electrification upgrades.
Windows and Doors | Mar 5, 2023
2022 North American Fenestration Standard released
The 2022 edition of AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440, “North American Fenestration Standard/Specification for windows, doors, and skylights” (NAFS) has been published. The updated 2022 standard replaces the 2017 edition, part of a continued evolution of the standard to improve harmonization across North America, according to a news release.
AEC Innovators | Mar 3, 2023
Meet BD+C's 2023 AEC Innovators
More than ever, AEC firms and their suppliers are wedding innovation with corporate responsibility. How they are addressing climate change usually gets the headlines. But as the following articles in our AEC Innovators package chronicle, companies are attempting to make an impact as well on the integrity of their supply chains, the reduction of construction waste, and answering calls for more affordable housing and homeless shelters. As often as not, these companies are partnering with municipalities and nonprofit interest groups to help guide their production.
Modular Building | Mar 3, 2023
Pallet Shelter is fighting homelessness, one person and modular pod at a time
Everett, Wash.-based Pallet Inc. helped the City of Burlington, Vt., turn a municipal parking lot into an emergency shelter community, complete with 30 modular “sleeping cabins” for the homeless.
Codes | Mar 2, 2023
Biden Administration’s proposed building materials rules increase domestic requirements
The Biden Administration’s proposal on building materials rules used on federal construction and federally funded state and local buildings would significantly boost the made-in-America mandate. In the past, products could qualify as domestically made if at least 55% of the value of their components were from the U.S.
Industry Research | Mar 2, 2023
Watch: Findings from Gensler's latest workplace survey of 2,000 office workers
Gensler's Janet Pogue McLaurin discusses the findings in the firm's 2022 Workplace Survey, based on responses from more than 2,000 workers in 10 industry sectors.
AEC Innovators | Mar 2, 2023
Turner Construction extends its ESG commitment to thwarting forced labor in its supply chain
Turner Construction joins a growing AEC industry movement, inspired by the Design for Freedom initiative, to eliminate forced labor and child labor from the production and distribution of building products.
