Top Science and Technology Sector Architecture Firms
| Rank | Company | 2013 S&T Sector Revenue |
| 1 | HDR | $55,700,000 |
| 2 | HOK | $50,260,857 |
| 3 | Stantec | $46,654,078 |
| 4 | Flad Architects | $38,940,000 |
| 5 | Perkins+will | $37,475,908 |
| 6 | Payette | $30,980,610 |
| 7 | SmithGroupJJR | $19,384,285 |
| 8 | EwingCole | $12,175,000 |
| 9 | ZGF Architects | $10,606,469 |
| 10 | Harley Ellis Devereaux | $9,340,000 |
| 11 | Ennead Architects | $6,158,951 |
| 12 | Kirksey | $5,138,330 |
| 13 | RS&H | $4,900,000 |
| 14 | NBBJ | $4,582,000 |
| 15 | Hastings+Chivetta Architects | $3,874,537 |
| 16 | RTKL Associates | $3,488,000 |
| 17 | Perkins Eastman | $3,100,000 |
| 18 | BSA LifeStructures | $2,854,789 |
| 19 | Clark Nexsen | $2,673,019 |
| 20 | Lord Aeck Sargent | $2,186,460 |
| 21 | HKS | $2,138,731 |
| 22 | EYP Architecture & Engineering | $2,000,000 |
| 23 | Shepley Bulfinch | $1,770,000 |
| 24 | Emersion Design | $1,726,902 |
| 25 | Bergmann Associates | $1,700,000 |
| 26 | Gensler | $1,644,004 |
| 27 | Ballinger | $1,608,659 |
| 28 | WHR Architects | $1,560,060 |
| 29 | Solomon Cordwell Buenz | $1,500,000 |
| 30 | Ware Malcomb | $1,449,500 |
| 31 | Hammel, Green and Abrahamson | $1,399,297 |
| 32 | Symmes Maini & McKee Associates | $1,290,000 |
| 33 | Page | $1,250,000 |
| 34 | NORR | $1,037,901 |
| 35 | FKP Architects | $1,000,000 |
| 36 | Francis Cauffman | $794,987 |
| 37 | VOA Associates | $794,232 |
| 38 | Heery International | $791,990 |
| 39 | Cooper Carry | $755,279 |
| 40 | DesignGroup | $676,860 |
| 41 | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill | $578,240 |
| 42 | RSP Architects | $552,000 |
| 43 | Swanke Hayden Connell Architects | $545,000 |
| 44 | Epstein | $506,000 |
| 45 | Wilson Architects | $500,000 |
| 46 | S/L/A/M Collaborative, The | $495,535 |
| 47 | Nelson | $404,850 |
| 48 | CTA Architects Engineers | $306,754 |
| 49 | JRS Architect | $145,000 |
| 50 | Harvard Jolly Architecture | $120,530 |
| 51 | Margulies Perruzzi Architects | $119,521 |
| 52 | KZF Design | $71,077 |
| 53 | Commonwealth Architects | $69,580 |
| 54 | Baskervill | $41,280 |
| 55 | Little | $33,876 |
| 56 | NAC|Architecture | $17,236 |
| 57 | Ratio Architects | $1,379 |
Top Science and Technology Sector Engineering Firms
| Rank | Company | 2013 S&T Sector Revenue |
| 1 | Affiliated Engineers | $28,609,000 |
| 2 | URS Corp. | $15,213,288 |
| 3 | WSP Group | $13,550,000 |
| 4 | Jacobs | $10,760,000 |
| 5 | Vanderweil Engineers | $9,556,500 |
| 6 | RMF Engineering | $8,900,000 |
| 7 | CRB | $8,200,000 |
| 8 | Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor | $5,200,000 |
| 9 | BR+A Consulting Engineers | $4,600,000 |
| 10 | Degenkolb Engineers | $4,476,429 |
| 11 | CCRD Partners | $3,530,000 |
| 12 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $3,479,323 |
| 13 | Mazzetti | $3,044,920 |
| 14 | Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering | $3,000,000 |
| 15 | RDK Engineers | $2,830,000 |
| 16 | M-E Engineers | $1,931,000 |
| 17 | Newcomb & Boyd | $1,831,915 |
| 18 | SSOE Group | $1,765,501 |
| 19 | Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corp. | $1,500,000 |
| 20 | Environmental Systems Design | $1,355,590 |
| 21 | STV | $1,114,000 |
| 22 | Glumac | $1,077,171 |
| 23 | Syska Hennessy Group | $985,040 |
| 24 | Karpinski Engineering | $868,633 |
| 25 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | $800,000 |
| 26 | AKF Group | $740,000 |
| 27 | P2S Engineering | $445,624 |
| 28 | KJWW Engineering Consultants | $385,407 |
| 29 | Interface Engineering | $348,341 |
| 30 | Coffman Engineers | $279,999 |
| 31 | Dunham Associates | $250,000 |
| 32 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $239,313 |
| 33 | Henderson Engineers | $219,691 |
| 34 | Thornton Tomasetti | $213,485 |
| 35 | H.F. Lenz | $211,000 |
| 36 | I. C. Thomasson Associates | $200,000 |
| 37 | OLA Consulting Engineers | $184,800 |
| 38 | Davis, Bowen & Friedel | $174,710 |
| 39 | Allen & Shariff | $128,000 |
| 40 | Spectrum Engineers | $126,582 |
| 41 | TTG | $124,162 |
| 42 | CJL Engineering | $122,500 |
| 43 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | $110,000 |
| 44 | Sparling | $107,790 |
| 45 | Wick Fisher White | $74,325 |
| 46 | Guernsey | $58,515 |
| 47 | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | $50,243 |
| 48 | French & Parrello Associates | $50,000 |
| 49 | Apogee Consulting Group | $42,320 |
| 50 | Walter P Moore and Associates | $41,790 |
| 51 | Zak Companies | $17,283 |
| 52 | Heapy Engineering | $14,759 |
| 53 | Brinjac Engineering | $8,704 |
Top Science and Technology Sector Construction Firms
| Rank | Company | 2013 S&T Sector Revenue |
| 1 | Skanska USA | $567,520,664 |
| 2 | DPR Construction | $269,947,839 |
| 3 | Turner Construction | $205,000,000 |
| 4 | Suffolk Construction | $164,816,499 |
| 5 | JE Dunn Construction | $162,998,885 |
| 6 | Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., The | $144,884,163 |
| 7 | Structure Tone | $92,170,000 |
| 8 | Kraus-Anderson Construction | $75,000,000 |
| 9 | Consigli Construction | $70,990,917 |
| 10 | Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction | $44,180,000 |
| 11 | Choate Construction | $38,400,718 |
| 12 | Manhattan Construction | $36,800,000 |
| 13 | LeChase Construction Services | $32,800,000 |
| 14 | McCarthy Holdings | $32,000,000 |
| 15 | Hill & Wilkinson | $30,263,000 |
| 16 | Hensel Phelps | $30,090,000 |
| 17 | McGough | $24,000,000 |
| 18 | Flintco | $14,250,000 |
| 19 | Alberici Constructors | $10,407,230 |
| 20 | S. M. Wilson & Co. | $10,383,344 |
| 21 | E.W. Howell | $9,541,000 |
| 22 | Hill International | $9,000,000 |
| 23 | Fortis Construction | $7,700,000 |
| 24 | Hoar Construction | $6,050,000 |
| 25 | Shawmut Design and Construction | $5,000,000 |
| 26 | HITT Contracting | $4,200,000 |
| 27 | Messer Construction | $3,491,416 |
| 28 | Tutor Perini Corp. | $3,447,967 |
| 29 | James G. Davis Construction | $2,884,634 |
| 30 | Stalco Construction | $2,602,000 |
| 31 | O'Neil Industries/W.E. O'Neil | $1,820,063 |
| 32 | BlueScope Construction | $1,555,063 |
| 33 | Coakley & Williams Construction | $1,514,454 |
| 34 | STV | $1,114,000 |
| 35 | Heery International | $791,990 |
| 36 | Bomel Construction | $578,354 |
| 37 | Weitz Company, The | $215,744 |
| 38 | JLL | $172,953 |
| 39 | W. M. Jordan Company | $171,674 |
| 40 | Allen & Shariff | $128,000 |
| 41 | Austin Commercial | $60,044 |
Read BD+C's full 2014 Giants 300 Report
Related Stories
Multifamily Housing | Mar 24, 2023
Average size of new apartments dropped sharply in 2022
The average size of new apartments in 2022 dropped sharply in 2022, as tracked by RentCafe. Across the U.S., the average new apartment size was 887 sf, down 30 sf from 2021, which was the largest year-over-year decrease.
Government Buildings | Mar 24, 2023
19 federal buildings named GSA Design Awards winners
After a six-year hiatus, the U.S. General Services Administration late last year resumed its esteemed GSA Design Awards program. In all, 19 federal building projects nationwide were honored with 2022 GSA Design Awards, eight with Honor Awards and 11 with Citations.
Transportation & Parking Facilities | Mar 23, 2023
Amsterdam debuts underwater bicycle parking facility that can accommodate over 4,000 bikes
In February, Amsterdam saw the opening of a new underwater bicycle parking facility. Located in the heart of the city—next to Amsterdam Central Station and under the river IJ (Amsterdam’s waterfront)—the facility, dubbed IJboulevard, has parking spots for over 4,000 bicycles, freeing up space on the street.
Healthcare Facilities | Mar 22, 2023
New Jersey’s new surgical tower features state’s first intraoperative MRI system
Hackensack (N.J.) University Medical Center recently opened its 530,000-sf Helena Theurer Pavilion, a nine-story surgical and intensive care tower designed by RSC Architects and Page. The county’s first hospital, Hackensack University Medical Center, a 781-bed nonprofit teaching and research hospital, was founded in 1888.
Project + Process Innovation | Mar 22, 2023
Onsite prefabrication for healthcare construction: It's more than a process, it's a partnership
Prefabrication can help project teams navigate an uncertain market. GBBN's Mickey LeRoy, AIA, ACHA, LEED AP, explains the difference between onsite and offsite prefabrication methods for healthcare construction projects.
Women in Design+Construction | Mar 21, 2023
Two leading women in construction events unite in 2023
The new Women in Residential + Commercial Construction Conference (WIR+CC) will take place in Nashville, Tenn., October 25-27, 2023. Combining these two long-standing events aligns with our mission to create an event most impactful for women in the $1.4 trillion U.S. commercial and residential design and construction industry.
Mass Timber | Mar 19, 2023
A 100% mass timber construction project is under way in North Carolina
An office building 100% made from mass timber has started construction within the Live Oak Bank campus in Wilmington, N.C. The 67,000-sf structure, a joint building venture between the GCs Swinerton and Wilmington-headquartered Monteith Construction, is scheduled for completion in early 2024.
Sports and Recreational Facilities | Mar 17, 2023
Aurora, Colo., recreation center features city’s first indoor field house, unobstructed views of the Rocky Mountains
In January, design firm Populous and the City of Aurora, Colo. marked the opening of the Southeast Aurora Recreation Center and Fieldhouse. The 77,000-sf facility draws design inspiration from the nearby Rocky Mountains. With natural Douglas Fir structure and decking, the building aims to mimic the geography of a canyon.
Architects | Mar 16, 2023
HKS launches partner diversity program to create a more diverse workforce and partnership network
Design firm HKS has launched a new partner diversity program that will work to build a more diverse AEC ecosystem. The HKS xBE program will give xBE firms (a term encompassing all disadvantaged businesses) and their members “access to opportunities to build relationships, pursue new work, and bolster innovation within the architecture and design professions,” according to HKS.
Sustainability | Mar 16, 2023
Lack of standards for carbon accounting hamper emissions reduction
A lack of universally accepted standards for collecting, managing, and storing greenhouse gas emissions data (i.e., carbon accounting) is holding back carbon reduction efforts, according to an essay published by the Rocky Mountain Institute.
