flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Sep 17, 2020

Spate of energy code appeals could hamper efficiency progress

Construction and fossil fuel interests oppose portions of latest model energy code.

Codes and Standards | Sep 16, 2020

Heat pumps are the future for hot water

Sustainability policies will drive trend.

Codes and Standards | Sep 15, 2020

Taller timber buildings approved in National Fire Protection Association code

Ensures compatibility with the International Building Code.

Codes and Standards | Sep 14, 2020

Relocation of neighborhoods, the next step in U.S. flood strategy, is underway

Repeated rebuilding after successive floods now seen as bad policy.

Codes and Standards | Sep 10, 2020

Fannie Mae programs provide incentives for multifamily solar

Affordable housing projects can find PV installations to be cost-effective.

Codes and Standards | Sep 9, 2020

Corporate pledges accelerate net-zero building movement

World Green Building Council drives goal of net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.

Codes and Standards | Sep 8, 2020

Study will examine elevator airflow amid COVID-19 pandemic

Researchers to investigate risk of airborne transmission.

Codes and Standards | Sep 4, 2020

Updated selection, application guide for plastic glazed skylights, sloped glazing released

Part of suite of skylight documents by Fenestration and Glazing Industry Alliance.

Codes and Standards | Sep 3, 2020

Turner Construction takes strong stand against racism

Shuts down work sites for anti-bias training.

Codes and Standards | Sep 2, 2020

California releases guide for state water policy

Water Resilience Portfolio is roadmap for meeting water needs as climate changes.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021