flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Nov 30, 2020

Finalized 2021 Energy Code leaves out future-proofing provision

Appeals process nixed requirement for residential electrification readiness.

Codes and Standards | Nov 23, 2020

GBCI turns over GRESB ownership to global investment firm

Organization assesses sustainability performance of real estate and infrastructure portfolios and assets.

Codes and Standards | Nov 23, 2020

New industrywide clay brick EPD launched

Contributes toward LEED v.4.0 and v.4.1 materials and resources requirements.

Codes and Standards | Nov 18, 2020

Commissioning study finds median energy savings of 3% to 16%

Berkeley Lab examines results of commissioning across building types.

Codes and Standards | Nov 17, 2020

Midtown Manhattan’s empty offices could be converted to affordable housing

Advocates envision idle offices re-zoned to alleviate housing crisis.

Codes and Standards | Nov 16, 2020

New concrete detailing manual includes downloadable CAD files

American Concrete Institute document contains guidance on codes for structural concrete.

Codes and Standards | Nov 12, 2020

California rent control measure defeated

Golden State voters reject Proposition 21.

Codes and Standards | Nov 10, 2020

Researchers and industry leaders will form national institute for AI in construction

Goal is to identify high-impact areas for application in design and construction.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021