flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Dec 16, 2021

Property owners need systematic approach to GHG emissions reduction

Energy hog buildings at risk for becoming stranded assets.

Codes and Standards | Dec 15, 2021

Design problems now the primary cause of construction claims and disputes

More likely to occur due to more tight timescales imposed upon third parties engaged in design.

Codes and Standards | Dec 13, 2021

ABC releases guide to technology for improving safety performance

Provides details on how to identify, choose, and implement technology.

Codes and Standards | Dec 8, 2021

Construction industry is the top target for cyberattacks

Smart building tech is a new avenue for criminals.

Codes and Standards | Dec 8, 2021

Proposals to add more multifamily to Atlanta prompt drive for Buckhead to secede

City aims to increase housing as projections point to sharp population increase.

Codes and Standards | Dec 7, 2021

Design problems now the primary cause of construction claims and disputes

More likely to occur due to more tight timescales imposed upon third parties engaged in design.

Codes and Standards | Dec 5, 2021

New standard for Phase I environmental reports requires more research work on many sites

Update affects around 250,000 commercial real estate transactions a year.

Codes and Standards | Nov 30, 2021

Dept. of Energy publishes RFP for technical assistance on supporting better building codes

Addresses advanced standards to reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions.

Codes and Standards | Nov 29, 2021

FAA seeking design of air traffic control towers of the future

Call for design submissions for safe, efficient structures.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021