flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Feb 17, 2022

Pandemic won’t alter urban planning

City planners focused on returning to ‘old normal’.

Codes and Standards | Feb 16, 2022

California court rules affordable housing developers exempt from local zoning

Case could set precedent on state law that overrides local rules.

Codes and Standards | Feb 15, 2022

FORTIFIED resiliency standard expanded to include multifamily sector

Voluntary, beyond-code program aims to protect buildings from severe weather.

Codes and Standards | Feb 10, 2022

Number of Americans at risk of flooding to double in 30 years

Most new risk from new development, not climate change.

Codes and Standards | Feb 10, 2022

Intl. Code Council committee on diversity seeks applicants

New board aims to increase diversity in the membership association.

Codes and Standards | Feb 9, 2022

Climate impact of gas stoves in U.S. equal to half a million cars

New study could increase momentum to ban fossil fuels in new buildings.

Codes and Standards | Feb 7, 2022

Energy efficiency ratings not reflecting true energy use

Highest rated U.K. buildings are less efficient than lower rated ones.

Codes and Standards | Feb 3, 2022

Illinois tops USGBC list of states with the most LEED certified projects in 2021

Top 10 states plus D.C. certified more than 247 million gross square feet.

Codes and Standards | Feb 2, 2022

Public works contracting reform advances in New York State

Governor signs bill to form advisory council that will propose policy changes.

Codes and Standards | Feb 2, 2022

Commercial and multifamily construction starts rebounded in 2021

Following COVID uncertainty in 2020, the industry recovered, but still lags 2019 levels.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021