According to an Associated Builders and Contractors analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data released today, national nonresidential construction spending rose 0.3% in April, totaling $792.6 billion on a seasonally adjusted annualized basis, which is a 6.4% increase compared to the same time last year. While public nonresidential spending expanded 4.8% on a monthly basis and increased 15.4% since April 2018, private nonresidential spending fell 2.9% in April and is up just 0.6 % year-over-year.
Among the 16 nonresidential construction spending categories, nine experienced an increase in monthly spending, with the largest increases registered in water supply (9.8%), highway and street (6.8%) and transportation (3.9%). Manufacturing (-7.1%) and commercial (-3.7%) experienced the largest decreases in April, though manufacturing spending is still up 10.9% compared to the same time last year.
“Today’s data release shows that nonresidential construction spending remains vigorous in America,” said ABC Chief Economist Anirban Basu. “While April’s monthly nonresidential construction spending growth of 0.3 percent appears lackluster, this was largely the result of a sizeable upward revision to March construction spending figures.
“Today’s data release also indicates that the baton has now been fully passed,” said Basu. “Earlier in the recovery, nonresidential construction spending growth was primarily driven by private segments. Low interest rates and abundant liquidity helped fuel private investment in hotels, data centers, casinos, fulfillment centers and other forms of private construction. But over the past year, private nonresidential construction spending has barely budged. Meanwhile, public residential spending is up 15.4 percent and April’s spending growth was led by water supply and highway/street.
“Given current levels of backlog, which expanded to 9.5 months in March 2019, nonresidential construction spending should remain elevated,” said Basu. “That said, risks of recession in 2020 are rapidly rising, which has the potential to reduce construction activity in 2021 and/or 2022.”
Related Stories
Market Data | Sep 23, 2020
7 must reads for the AEC industry today: September 23, 2020
The new Theodore Presidential Library and the AIA/HUD's Secretary's Awards honor affordable, accessible housing.
Market Data | Sep 22, 2020
6 must reads for the AEC industry today: September 22, 2020
Construction employment declined in 39 states and no ease of lumber prices in sight.
Market Data | Sep 21, 2020
Washington is the US state with the most value of construction projects underway, says GlobalData
Of the top 10 largest projects in the Washington state, nine were in the execution stage as of August 2020.
Market Data | Sep 21, 2020
Construction employment declined in 39 states between August 2019 and 2020
31 states and DC added jobs between July and August.
Market Data | Sep 21, 2020
6 must reads for the AEC industry today: September 21, 2020
Four projects receive 202 AIA/ALA Library Building Award and Port San Antonio's new Innovation Center.
Market Data | Sep 18, 2020
Follow up survey of U.S. code officials demonstrates importance of continued investment in virtual capabilities
Existing needs highlight why supporting building and fire prevention departments at the federal, state, and local levels is critical.
Market Data | Sep 18, 2020
6 must reads for the AEC industry today: September 18, 2020
Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back and energy code appeals could hamper efficiency progress.
Market Data | Sep 17, 2020
6 must reads for the AEC industry today: September 17, 2020
Foster + Partners-designed hospital begins construction in Cairo and heat pumps are the future for hot water.
Market Data | Sep 16, 2020
6 must reads for the AEC industry today: September 16, 2020
REI sells unused HQ building and Adjaye Associates will design The Africa Institute.
Market Data | Sep 15, 2020
7 must reads for the AEC industry today: September 15, 2020
Energy efficiency considerations for operating buildings during a pandemic and is there really a glass box paradox?