flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

New York City is positioning itself as a life sciences hub

Laboratories

New York City is positioning itself as a life sciences hub

A new Transwestern report highlights favorable market and regulatory changes.


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | September 12, 2017

The Alexandria Center for Life Sciences, in the Gramercy section of Manhattan's East Side, has two towers with a total of 729,000 sf that are completely leased. Zoning changes are making it easier for life sciences companies to build lab and research space in New York City. Image: Alexandria Real Estate Equities

Developers Taconic Investment Partners and Silverstein Properties are spending $20 million to renovate the 326,861-sf Movie Lab building in Midtown Manhattan for life science research usage.

The New York Post reports that the Stem Cell Foundation has leased 42,100 sf in this building since 2015. Another 150,000 sf on the top floors of this 10-story building are being upgraded to attract more life science tenants. The building reportedly is changing its name to the Hudson Research Center.

Transwestern, which is marketing this lab space for the developers, has released a special report that portrays New York City as an emerging life sciences hub, where space is tight and development opportunities are multiplying.

New York is already a significant player in this field, by virtue of being home to 11 major academic medical centers, including Weill Cornell Medical College and Albert Einstein College of Medicine. The city also has three of the country’s top 15 hospitals and five of the top 50 medical schools, according to U.S. News and World Report’s latest report card.

 

New York City is already a leader in life sciences employment and, more recently, available funding. Image: Transwestern

 

The city also one of the country’s highest concentrations of life-science employees, accounting for one-fifth of the total employment in this sector within the top 10 life science markets.

The problem is shortage of lab space. Transwestern estimates that 100% of the city’s 1.7 million sf of existing life science and research space is occupied. And until recently, New York’s zoning restrictions made it particularly tough for life science companies to build lab space within manufacturing districts—M Zones—that restrict chemical compounding and packaging, the creation of pharmaceutical products and medical appliances, laboratories, research, experimental and testing facilities.

But over the past year or so, market and regulatory changes have made development more conducive for lab science expansion.

Indeed, recent lease transactions have included 49,143 sf at 10 Hudson Yards for Intercept Pharmaceuticals, 30,000 sf at 101 Avenue of the Americas for JLABS (division of J&J Innovations), 19,645 sf at 100 Wall Street for Integra Partners, 11,865 sf at 600 Third Avenue for Turing Pharmaceuticals, and 11,537 sf at 25 West 45th Street for Crossover Health.

More investment capital and funding are flowing into the city for this sector. Out of the $31.3 billion in National Institutes of Health funding awarded nationally in 2016, the New York metro area received $2.7 billion in NIH grants. New York City alone was awarded $1.4 billion, ranking it the second-highest funded city in the country.

 

More dollars from the National Institutes of Health are flowing into New York State and, particularly, New York City. Image: NIH/Transwestern

 

Last December, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo unveiled a state-funded life science initiative that includes $250 million in tax incentives for new and existing life science companies, $200 million in state capital grants to further support investment in wet-lab and innovation space, $100 million in investment capital for early stage life science initiatives, and a state match of at least $100 million for operating support from private sector partnerships.

New York City Mayor Bill DiBlasio also has launched a program called LifeSci NYC, which will include a $100 million investment to create a new applied life science campus, $50 million to expand a network of life science R&D facilities, $10 million to expand the network of incubators, $20 million a year in matching funds to support early-stage businesses, and $300 million in tax incentives for commercial lab space.

On the zoning front, in December the Departments of Buildings (DOB) and City Planning (DCP), and the Economic Development Corporation (EDC) issued a clarification memo updating their interpretation of the zoning in the several commercial districts.

The city agencies and the EDC, says Transwestern, “broadened their understanding of the current use group 9A zoning to also include the “synthesis and manipulation of chemical substances, biological matter, and animal models … [that] are integral activities in commercial medical laboratories devoted to research and testing.”

Already, new research and lab spaces are popping up. The Cornell Tech campus on New York City’s Roosevelt Island just opened its first phase. And the 1.17-million-sf Building 77 at the Brooklyn Navy Yard is undergoing a $185 million renovation that could attract lab tenants. 

Related Stories

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 70 Science + Technology Facility Contractors + CM Firms 2022

Whiting-Turner, Hensel Phelps, DPR Construction, and Skanska USA top the rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facility contractors and construction management (CM) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 70 Science + Technology Facility Engineering + EA Firms 2022

Jacobs, CRB, Fluor, and Affiliated Engineers Inc. head the rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facility engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 100 Science + Technology Facility Architecture + AE Firms 2022

HDR, Flad Architects, Gensler, and DGA top the rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facility architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 45 Laboratory Facility Contractors and Construction Management Firms for 2022

Whiting-Turner, Hensel Phelps, McCarthy, and STO Building Group top the ranking of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) laboratory facility contractors and construction management (CM) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 55 Laboratory Facility Engineering + EA Firms for 2022

Jacobs, Affiliated Engineers Inc., Burns & McDonnell, and WSP top the ranking of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) laboratory facility engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 85 Laboratory Facility Architecture + AE Firms for 2022

Flad Architects, HDR, DGA, and Payette top the ranking of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) laboratory facility architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 90 Construction Management Firms for 2022

CBRE, Alfa Tech, Jacobs, and Hill International head the rankings of the nation's largest construction management (as agent) and program/project management firms for nonresidential and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 200 Contractors for 2022

Turner Construction, STO Building Group, Whiting-Turner, and DPR Construction top the ranking of the nation's largest general contractors, CM at risk firms, and design-builders for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 45 Engineering Architecture Firms for 2022

Jacobs, AECOM, WSP, and Burns & McDonnell top the rankings of the nation's largest engineering architecture (EA) firms for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 19, 2022

2022 Giants 400 Report: Tracking the nation's largest architecture, engineering, and construction firms

Now 46 years running, Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report rankings the largest architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. This year a record 519 AEC firms participated in BD+C's Giants 400 report. The final report includes more than 130 rankings across 25 building sectors and specialty categories. 

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




Laboratories

The Department of Energy breaks ground on the Princeton Plasma Innovation Center

In Princeton, N.J., the U.S. Department of Energy’s Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) has broken ground on the Princeton Plasma Innovation Center (PPIC), a state-of-the-art office and laboratory building. Designed and constructed by SmithGroup, the $109.7 million facility will provide space for research supporting PPPL’s expanded mission into microelectronics, quantum sensors and devices, and sustainability sciences. 

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021