Starting in 2024, the electric bills of most Californians could be based not only on how much power they use, but also on how much money they make. Those who have higher incomes would pay more; those with lower incomes would see their electric bills decline.
A law passed last year in California requires state utility regulators to devise a plan for charging customers income-based fixed fees as part of their electric bills by July 2024. If California goes ahead with this plan, it would be the first state to enact such a change.
The income-based billing concept has provoked strong debate as advocates and opponents argue over whether such a measure would encourage or discourage adoption of sustainable technologies such as solar panels backed with battery systems, electric vehicles, and heat pumps. Opponents include supporters of green technology who fear such a change would discourage customers from investing in new technology to reduce their electricity usage, according to a report in Grist. They say higher costs spur more people to use electricity more efficiently.
Supporters of income-based electric bills say just the opposite: reducing utility costs for lower income individuals could actually encourage them to use the savings from lower bills to install heat pumps and buy EVs.
A key point in the debate revolves around cost related to things that are not linked to usage such as burying electric supply lines to reduce wildfires. Such expenditures are passed on to all customers regardless of the amount of power they consume.
Both sides can agree on one thing: customers are already fed up with rates that have been rising at three times the rate of inflation in recent years. And, escalating electric bills are almost a certainty in the foreseeable future.
Related Stories
| Jul 18, 2014
Engineering firms look to bolster growth through new services, technology [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Following solid revenue growth in 2013, the majority of U.S.-based engineering and engineering/architecture firms expect more of the same this year, according to BD+C’s 2014 Giants 300 report.
| Jul 18, 2014
Top Engineering/Architecture Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Jacobs, AECOM, Parsons Brinckerhoff top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest engineering/architecture firms in the United States.
| Jul 18, 2014
Top Engineering Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Fluor, Arup, Day & Zimmermann top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest engineering firms in the United States.
| Jul 18, 2014
Top Architecture Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Gensler, Perkins+Will, NBBJ top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest architecture firms in the United States.
| Jul 18, 2014
2014 Giants 300 Report
Building Design+Construction magazine's annual ranking the nation's largest architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S.
| Jul 17, 2014
A harmful trade-off many U.S. green buildings make
The Urban Green Council addresses a concern that many "green" buildings in the U.S. have: poor insulation.
| Jul 17, 2014
A high-rise with outdoor, vertical community space? It's possible! [slideshow]
Danish design firm C.F. Møller has developed a novel way to increase community space without compromising privacy or indoor space.
| Jul 11, 2014
First look: Jeanne Gang reinterprets San Francisco Bay windows in new skyscraper scheme
Chicago architect Jeanne Gang has designed a 40-story residential building in San Francisco that is inspired by the city's omnipresent bay windows.
| Jul 10, 2014
Unique design of Toronto's townhome The Tree House
Plans for a new Toronto townhome brings cutting-edge design.
| Jul 7, 2014
7 emerging design trends in brick buildings
From wild architectural shapes to unique color blends and pattern arrangements, these projects demonstrate the design possibilities of brick.
