flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

GSA adopts SITES land development and management rating system

Codes and Standards

GSA adopts SITES land development and management rating system

Federal agency will use for properties with and without buildings.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 25, 2016
GSA adopts SITES land development and management rating system

Built on a industrial brownfield, the Perot Museum of Nature and Science in Dallas is a SITES project. Photo: Joe Mabel/Wikimedia Commons.

The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) has adopted the SITES rating system for its capital construction program. 

Green Business Certification Inc.’s SITES is a program for sustainable land development and management and is used by landscape architects, engineers, architects, developers, and policymakers to align land development with innovative sustainable design. SITES certification is for development projects located on sites with or without buildings including national parks, corporate campuses, streetscapes, homes, and more.

GSA is one of the largest and most diversified public real estate organizations in the world with a portfolio of 376.9 million rentable square feet in 8,721 active assets, and more than 144,000 acres of land, including ports of entry and historical properties. The GSA determined that incorporating SITES into the program offers a highly effective and efficient way to ensure environmental performance to meet federal goals on various capital project types.

The rating system provides a metrics-based approach to important concepts like ecosystem services and green infrastructure. The GSA’s decision is incorporated in the 2016 version of Facilities Standards for the Public Buildings Service (P-100), which establishes design standards and criteria for new buildings, infrastructural projects, major and minor alternations, and work in historic structures for the Public Buildings Service (PBS) of the GSA. This document contains both policy and technical criteria used in the programming, design, and documentation of GSA buildings and facilities.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Oct 22, 2019

Efficient material design, low-carbon concrete are critical to cutting GHG emissions in construction

Enhancing building utilization and reusing materials also aid carbon reduction.

Codes and Standards | Oct 18, 2019

St. Louis could save $61 million per year in energy costs by improved building performance

GHG gases can be reduced by at least 11% with upgrades to public buildings and large private buildings.

Codes and Standards | Oct 17, 2019

Slow payments cost GCs and subs $64 billion annually

Study finds 51-day average payment turnaround.

Codes and Standards | Oct 16, 2019

Cool pavement can make people hotter

Reflective coatings channel sunlight raising temperatures where pedestrians walk.

Codes and Standards | Oct 15, 2019

Utah adopts 2018 International Energy Conservation Code

Provisions include increased building envelope performance and reduced air infiltration.

Codes and Standards | Oct 14, 2019

States continue to beef up energy efficiency codes

ACEEE 50-state scorecard finds latest IECC code gaining adherents.

Codes and Standards | Oct 9, 2019

DOE releases Better Buildings Healthcare Financing Primer

Outlines financial strategies to implement energy-efficiency projects in healthcare.

Codes and Standards | Oct 8, 2019

Zero Carbon Buildings for All aims for ambitious emission reduction targets

Organization makes commitment to net zero carbon for all buildings by 2050.

Codes and Standards | Oct 7, 2019

Tailgating remains a critical building security threat, say security professionals

Few buildings provide beefed up provisions to counteract threat.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021