flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

GSA adopts SITES land development and management rating system

Codes and Standards

GSA adopts SITES land development and management rating system

Federal agency will use for properties with and without buildings.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 25, 2016
GSA adopts SITES land development and management rating system

Built on a industrial brownfield, the Perot Museum of Nature and Science in Dallas is a SITES project. Photo: Joe Mabel/Wikimedia Commons.

The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) has adopted the SITES rating system for its capital construction program. 

Green Business Certification Inc.’s SITES is a program for sustainable land development and management and is used by landscape architects, engineers, architects, developers, and policymakers to align land development with innovative sustainable design. SITES certification is for development projects located on sites with or without buildings including national parks, corporate campuses, streetscapes, homes, and more.

GSA is one of the largest and most diversified public real estate organizations in the world with a portfolio of 376.9 million rentable square feet in 8,721 active assets, and more than 144,000 acres of land, including ports of entry and historical properties. The GSA determined that incorporating SITES into the program offers a highly effective and efficient way to ensure environmental performance to meet federal goals on various capital project types.

The rating system provides a metrics-based approach to important concepts like ecosystem services and green infrastructure. The GSA’s decision is incorporated in the 2016 version of Facilities Standards for the Public Buildings Service (P-100), which establishes design standards and criteria for new buildings, infrastructural projects, major and minor alternations, and work in historic structures for the Public Buildings Service (PBS) of the GSA. This document contains both policy and technical criteria used in the programming, design, and documentation of GSA buildings and facilities.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Dec 28, 2020

2021 Defense Authorization Act includes mass timber provision

Directs defense, agriculture secretaries to review potential for wood frame construction on defense building projects.

Codes and Standards | Dec 28, 2020

New York City proposal would require rainwater detention tanks for new development

Rule would apply to projects on lots sized 20,000 sf or larger.

Codes and Standards | Dec 17, 2020

Energy efficiency as a service gaining ground as financing approach for adopting innovations

Building owners can invest in new technology with no upfront cost.

Codes and Standards | Dec 16, 2020

Resources available to address Legionella threat

Buildings reopened after extended pandemic closure are at risk.

Codes and Standards | Dec 16, 2020

New Specifications for Concrete Construction reference manual released

Scope expanded to include shotcrete, internal curing, mineral fillers, and recycled concrete aggregates.

Codes and Standards | Dec 15, 2020

Despite COVID-19 population flight, don’t write off big cities yet

Lure of urban life and jobs may draw people back after pandemic subsides.

Codes and Standards | Dec 10, 2020

Test method for vertical fenestration installation procedures updated

FGIA issues first update for document created in 2005.

Codes and Standards | Dec 9, 2020

Newly formed Rainscreen Association aims to be recognized authority on rainscreen assemblies

Will address innovations in material performance and building designs.

Codes and Standards | Dec 9, 2020

Investors want building resiliency plans and risk mitigation practices

Owners should assess risk, insurance coverage, and ability to withstand disasters.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021