flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

GSA adopts SITES land development and management rating system

Codes and Standards

GSA adopts SITES land development and management rating system

Federal agency will use for properties with and without buildings.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 25, 2016
GSA adopts SITES land development and management rating system

Built on a industrial brownfield, the Perot Museum of Nature and Science in Dallas is a SITES project. Photo: Joe Mabel/Wikimedia Commons.

The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) has adopted the SITES rating system for its capital construction program. 

Green Business Certification Inc.’s SITES is a program for sustainable land development and management and is used by landscape architects, engineers, architects, developers, and policymakers to align land development with innovative sustainable design. SITES certification is for development projects located on sites with or without buildings including national parks, corporate campuses, streetscapes, homes, and more.

GSA is one of the largest and most diversified public real estate organizations in the world with a portfolio of 376.9 million rentable square feet in 8,721 active assets, and more than 144,000 acres of land, including ports of entry and historical properties. The GSA determined that incorporating SITES into the program offers a highly effective and efficient way to ensure environmental performance to meet federal goals on various capital project types.

The rating system provides a metrics-based approach to important concepts like ecosystem services and green infrastructure. The GSA’s decision is incorporated in the 2016 version of Facilities Standards for the Public Buildings Service (P-100), which establishes design standards and criteria for new buildings, infrastructural projects, major and minor alternations, and work in historic structures for the Public Buildings Service (PBS) of the GSA. This document contains both policy and technical criteria used in the programming, design, and documentation of GSA buildings and facilities.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Mar 3, 2021

Texas freeze raises questions about risks of electrifying buildings

Gas stoves helped residents cook, boil water when power went out.

Codes and Standards | Mar 2, 2021

New Seattle building code eliminates fossil fuels for most space and water heating

Also increases on-site solar photovoltaics, reduces envelope heat loss, air leakage, and interior lighting power allowances.

Codes and Standards | Feb 25, 2021

It’s not just lumber—roofing material prices are also on the rise

Lower demand for petroleum products means less asphalt production.

Codes and Standards | Feb 23, 2021

ASHRAE Epidemic Task Force releases updated Building Readiness Guide

Includes flush calculations to reduce time and energy to clear contaminants between occupancy periods.

Codes and Standards | Feb 22, 2021

Preservation of Affordable Housing develops climate resilience strategy

Includes backup power for resident and staff “area of refuge”.

Codes and Standards | Feb 18, 2021

Construction industry moves toward comprehensive U.S. BIM standard

NIBS hosts roundtable to create coordinated program to advance collaboration.

Codes and Standards | Feb 17, 2021

Construction on international sports venues is ripe for corruption

Poor planning, complex contracting, a lack of accountability and high levels of collusion to blame.

Codes and Standards | Feb 16, 2021

Feds may fund removal of some urban highways

Senate bill proposes pilot program to reknit communities.

Codes and Standards | Feb 16, 2021

Bechtel joins international heat resilience organization

Experience designing resilience standards to aid effort to protect communities from extreme heat.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021