Most construction disputes are settled before they erupt into migraine-inducing litigation. But global asset volatility, currency turbulence, and the loss of economic momentum globally, have made dispute resolution tougher to reach amicably. And, in fact, for the third consecutive year, the length of disputes rose in 2015, according to a new report by Arcadis, the international design and consultancy firm, based on an in-depth review of projects that the firm’s Contract Solutions team handled last year.
Arcadis, which is active in 70 countries, defines a dispute as a “situation where two parties typically differ in the assertion of a contractual right.” Last year, the value of disputes fell by nearly 11% to an average of $46 million. However, the length of time it took to resolve these conflicts increased to a record average of 15.2 months, compared to 13.2 months in 2014 and 11.8 months in 2013.
The highest value dispute that Arcadis handled last year was worth a whopping $2.5 billion. (The firm did not state where that dispute arose.)
Contractual disputes took longer to mediate for the third consecutive year in 2015. The No. 1 cause for disputes continues to be faulty contract administration. Image: Arcadis “Global Construction Dispute Report 2016.”
“The increased length of disputes will have multiple effects for both parties and are likely to, ultimately, have a negative impact on the construction industry,” Arcadis cautions in its report.
The No. 1 cause for disputes was failure to properly administer a contract, followed by a poorly written draft and unsubstantiated claims. The property/real estate sector had the most disputes, followed by the social infrastructure/public sector. Arcadis notes, ruefully, that more than one-quarter of joint ventures end in disputes.
Party-to-party negotiation is still the most common form of resolving disputes. And the best ways to avoid disputes in the first place is to make sure the contract is administered properly, the documents are accurate, and the contract has fair and appropriate risk and balances.
While the number of disputes in North America was up last year, their average values and lengths dipped. The value of disputes last year averaged $25 million, a 15.5% drop from the previous year. And the length of disputes in North America was down by nearly three months, to an average of 13.5 months compared to 16.2 in 2014.
Arcadis notes that the U.S. was the only global region to achieve both a decrease in construction dispute values and length of time to resolve disputes last year. “But there is one downside,” notes Roy Cooper, a Vice President for Arcadis North America. “Even though more disputes are being settled early, the ones that remain grow into complicated, emotional affairs, with large damages at stake. These also take longer to resolve, since U.S. courts hate to try construction cases due to their large volumes of documents and greater complexity.”
In North America, errors and omissions in contracts documents are the most common reasons for disputes.
“We expect that the decline in duration and value will continue into 2016 as the industry [in North America] continues to recognize the importance of addressing disputes early in their lifecycle, and contracts are written with provisions giving strict instruction on how and when to address disputes,” writes Arcadis.
Conversely, the Middle East now surpasses Asia as Dispute Central when it comes to contractual disagreements. The average dispute value in that region jumped by 6.9% last year to $82 million, and the length of disputes rose marginally to an average of 15.2 months.
Disputes drag out even longer in Continental Europe, which averaged 18.5 months last year. “Conflicting party interests” was cited by Arcadis as the No. 1 cause for disputes.
Joint ventures are most vulnerable to contract disputes. And the Middle East far exceeds global averages in the value and lenght of its construction disputes. Image: Arcadis “Global Construction Dispute Report 2016.”
Related Stories
Market Data | Sep 18, 2018
Altus Group report reveals shifts in trade policy, technology, and financing are disrupting global real estate development industry
International trade uncertainty, widespread construction skills shortage creating perfect storm for escalating project costs; property development leaders split on potential impact of emerging technologies.
Market Data | Sep 17, 2018
ABC’s Construction Backlog Indicator hits a new high in second quarter of 2018
Backlog is up 12.2% from the first quarter and 14% compared to the same time last year.
Market Data | Sep 12, 2018
Construction material prices fall in August
Softwood lumber prices plummeted 9.6% in August yet are up 5% on a yearly basis (down from a 19.5% increase year-over-year in July).
Market Data | Sep 7, 2018
Safety risks in commercial construction industry exacerbated by workforce shortages
The report revealed 88% of contractors expect to feel at least a moderate impact from the workforce shortages in the next three years.
Market Data | Sep 5, 2018
Public nonresidential construction up in July
Private nonresidential spending fell 1% in July, while public nonresidential spending expanded 0.7%.
Market Data | Aug 30, 2018
Construction in ASEAN region to grow by over 6% annually over next five years
Although there are disparities in the pace of growth in construction output among the ASEAN member states, the region’s construction industry as a whole will grow by 6.1% on an annual average basis in the next five years.
Market Data | Aug 22, 2018
July architecture firm billings remain positive despite growth slowing
Architecture firms located in the South remain especially strong.
Market Data | Aug 15, 2018
National asking rents for office space rise again
The rise in rental rates marks the 21st consecutive quarterly increase.
Market Data | Aug 13, 2018
First Half 2018 commercial and multifamily construction starts show mixed performance across top metropolitan areas
Gains reported in five of the top ten markets.