In a recent survey, nearly 900 construction firms reported gains in profitability last year, especially among the top 25% whose financial performances significantly outpaced the respondents as a whole.
The Construction Financial Management Association (CFMA), headquartered in Princeton, N.J., emailed its annual questionnaire to about 8,000 member and nonmember construction firms, as well as member CPA firms that represent construction companies. CFMA received data from 869 companies, which submitted detailed financial statements and other required information.
Thirty-seven percent of the respondents were Industrial & Nonresidential contractors, 19% Heavy & Highway contractors, 43% Specialty Trade contractors, and less than 1% classified as “Other.” The typical company reported total annual sales of $39,710,000 for the 2015 fiscal year. Those with sales under $10 million comprised 16% of responding companies, and 8% of respondents reported sales of over $300 million.
Smaller contracting companies showed stronger earnings last year. Chart: Construction Financial Management Association.
On average, the respondents’ returns on assets and equity rose last year. Returns on Assets was 9%, versus 6.9% in 2014. Returns on equity jumped to 25.3% in 2015, from 19% the previous year.
On the whole, getting paid for services rendered remains a struggle. The respondents’ invoices were in accounts receivable for an average of 55.2 days last year, an increase over the previous two years. As for their accounts payable, the contractors reported a decline to 33.4 days last year, from 35.6 days in 2014.
Gross profits as a percentage of revenue increased to 15%, from 13.1% in 2014. And net income last year stood a 4.4% of sales, versus 3.1% the previous year.
CFMA broke out the financial data by sales volume, and found that companies generating under $10 million in revenue generally had higher profitability ratios than other cohorts. Perhaps coincidentally, the smaller companies had lower debt-to-equity ratios, and significantly lower “underbillings-to-equity” ratios (4.4%, compared to 15.6% for companies with $300 million or more in annual revenue).
Conversely, the largest companies by revenue were more productive, reporting sales per employee of $751,348 ($276,000 more per employee than companies with between $100 million and $300 million in sales, and even higher compared to the other groups), and gross profit per employee of $71,851.
The top-performing contractors—based on a composite ranking of five performance metrics (ROA, ROE, debt to equity, fixed-asset ratios, and gross profit per employee)—were head and shoulders above respondent averages.
The highest achievers reported a 24% Return on Assets and 58.5% Return on Equity, substantively higher on both counts than the survey’s averages noted above.
Best in Class companies also reported less debt (1.2 times debt-to-equity versus 1.8 times for all respondents) and a more stable fixed asset ratio (16.6% versus 25.1% for all respondents). All respondents averaged a 15% gross profit margin, while the Best in Class companies achieved an 18.4% margin. Further, all respondents earned a 4.4% net income before taxes, compared with the highest achievers, which averaged 8.4% margin.
The CFMA survey was compiled and analyzed by Industry Insights and the organization’s Financial Survey & Benchmarker Committee. It did not provide explanations about why some contractors performed better than others.
Related Stories
Contractors | Jan 7, 2021
The Weekly show, Jan 7, 2021: Preconstruction boot camp, and leadership strategies for navigating a challenging market
The January 7 episode of BD+C's The Weekly is available for viewing on demand.
Contractors | Jan 4, 2021
Optimizing construction projects with value engineering
When value engineering is referenced in our industry, our minds may immediately go to a process that reduces project cost by slashing scope or decreasing the quality of materials used. However, that is not necessarily what the definition should be.
AEC Tech | Dec 17, 2020
The Weekly show: The future of eSports facilities, meet the National Institute for AI in Construction
The December 17 episode of BD+C's The Weekly is available for viewing on demand.
Multifamily Housing | Dec 16, 2020
What the Biden Administration means for multifamily construction
What can the multifamily real estate sector expect from Biden and Company? At the risk of having egg, if not a whole omelet, on my face, let me take a shot.
Giants 400 | Dec 16, 2020
Download a PDF of all 2020 Giants 400 Rankings
This 70-page PDF features AEC firm rankings across 51 building sectors, disciplines, and specialty services.
Healthcare Facilities | Dec 10, 2020
The Weekly show: The future of medical office buildings, and virtual internship programs
This week on The Weekly show, BD+C editors spoke with leaders from SMRT Architects and Engineers and Stantec about the future of medical office buildings, and virtual internship programs
Contractors | Dec 4, 2020
‘Speed to market’ defines general contractor activities in 2020
Contractors are more receptive than ever to ways that help get projects done faster.
Multifamily Housing | Dec 4, 2020
The Weekly show: Designing multifamily housing for COVID-19, and trends in historic preservation and adaptive reuse
This week on The Weekly show, BD+C editors spoke with leaders from Page & Turnbull and Grimm + Parker Architects about designing multifamily housing for COVID-19, and trends in historic preservation and adaptive reuse
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Science & Technology Facilities Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the S+T sector
HDR, Jacobs, and Turner head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Laboratory Facilities Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. laboratory facilities sector
Affiliated Engineers, HDR, and Skanska top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest laboratory facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.