In a recent survey, nearly 900 construction firms reported gains in profitability last year, especially among the top 25% whose financial performances significantly outpaced the respondents as a whole.
The Construction Financial Management Association (CFMA), headquartered in Princeton, N.J., emailed its annual questionnaire to about 8,000 member and nonmember construction firms, as well as member CPA firms that represent construction companies. CFMA received data from 869 companies, which submitted detailed financial statements and other required information.
Thirty-seven percent of the respondents were Industrial & Nonresidential contractors, 19% Heavy & Highway contractors, 43% Specialty Trade contractors, and less than 1% classified as “Other.” The typical company reported total annual sales of $39,710,000 for the 2015 fiscal year. Those with sales under $10 million comprised 16% of responding companies, and 8% of respondents reported sales of over $300 million.
Smaller contracting companies showed stronger earnings last year. Chart: Construction Financial Management Association.
On average, the respondents’ returns on assets and equity rose last year. Returns on Assets was 9%, versus 6.9% in 2014. Returns on equity jumped to 25.3% in 2015, from 19% the previous year.
On the whole, getting paid for services rendered remains a struggle. The respondents’ invoices were in accounts receivable for an average of 55.2 days last year, an increase over the previous two years. As for their accounts payable, the contractors reported a decline to 33.4 days last year, from 35.6 days in 2014.
Gross profits as a percentage of revenue increased to 15%, from 13.1% in 2014. And net income last year stood a 4.4% of sales, versus 3.1% the previous year.
CFMA broke out the financial data by sales volume, and found that companies generating under $10 million in revenue generally had higher profitability ratios than other cohorts. Perhaps coincidentally, the smaller companies had lower debt-to-equity ratios, and significantly lower “underbillings-to-equity” ratios (4.4%, compared to 15.6% for companies with $300 million or more in annual revenue).
Conversely, the largest companies by revenue were more productive, reporting sales per employee of $751,348 ($276,000 more per employee than companies with between $100 million and $300 million in sales, and even higher compared to the other groups), and gross profit per employee of $71,851.
The top-performing contractors—based on a composite ranking of five performance metrics (ROA, ROE, debt to equity, fixed-asset ratios, and gross profit per employee)—were head and shoulders above respondent averages.
The highest achievers reported a 24% Return on Assets and 58.5% Return on Equity, substantively higher on both counts than the survey’s averages noted above.
Best in Class companies also reported less debt (1.2 times debt-to-equity versus 1.8 times for all respondents) and a more stable fixed asset ratio (16.6% versus 25.1% for all respondents). All respondents averaged a 15% gross profit margin, while the Best in Class companies achieved an 18.4% margin. Further, all respondents earned a 4.4% net income before taxes, compared with the highest achievers, which averaged 8.4% margin.
The CFMA survey was compiled and analyzed by Industry Insights and the organization’s Financial Survey & Benchmarker Committee. It did not provide explanations about why some contractors performed better than others.
Related Stories
Market Data | Apr 20, 2021
The pandemic moves subs and vendors closer to technology
Consigli’s latest market outlook identifies building products that are high risk for future price increases.
Adaptive Reuse | Apr 15, 2021
The Weekly Show, Apr 15, 2021: The ins and outs of adaptive reuse, and sensors for real-time construction monitoring
This week on The Weekly show, BD+C editors speak with AEC industry leaders from PBDW Architects and Wohlsen Construction about what makes adaptive reuse projects successful, and sensors for real-time monitoring of concrete construction.
Contractors | Apr 9, 2021
Construction bidding activity ticks up in February
The Blue Book Network's Velocity Index measures month-to-month changes in bidding activity among construction firms across five building sectors and in all 50 states.
Industry Research | Apr 9, 2021
BD+C exclusive research: What building owners want from AEC firms
BD+C’s first-ever owners’ survey finds them focused on improving buildings’ performance for higher investment returns.
Multifamily Housing | Mar 30, 2021
Bipartisan ‘YIMBY’ bill would provide $1.5B in grants to spur new housing
Resources for local leaders to overcome obstacles such as density-unfriendly or discriminatory zoning.
Office Buildings | Mar 26, 2021
Finding success for downtown office space after COVID-19
Using the right planning tools can spur new uses for Class B and C commercial real estate.
Architects | Mar 25, 2021
The Weekly Show, March 25, 2021: The Just Label for AEC firms, and Perkins Eastman's Well-Platinum design studio
This week on The Weekly show, BD+C editors speak with AEC industry leaders about the Just Label from the International Living Future Institute, and the features and amenities at Perkins Eastman's Well Platinum-certified design studio.
Contractors | Mar 16, 2021
Autodesk U.S. Construction Outlook 2021 report finds commercial bidding activity has surpassed pre-pandemic levels
Despite forecasted drop in non-residential spending for 2021, real-time bidding data from BuildingConnected suggests short-term relief is en route as delayed or rescheduled projects come back online.
Coronavirus | Mar 11, 2021
The Weekly show, March 11, 2021: 5 building products for COVID-related conditions, and AI for MEP design
This week on The Weekly show, BD+C editors speak with AEC industry leaders about building products and systems that support COVID-related conditions, and an AI tool that automates the design of MEP systems.
Laboratories | Mar 10, 2021
8 tips for converting office space to life sciences labs
Creating a successful life sciences facility within the shell of a former office building can be much like that old “square peg round hole” paradigm. Two experts offer important advice.