flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | May 24, 2019

USGBC receives funding for LEED for Cities and Communities Program

Bank of America provides $500,000 grant to certify 15 U.S. cities.

Codes and Standards | May 24, 2019

AIA updates Interiors Contract Documents

Six revised documents available for interior construction projects.

Codes and Standards | May 23, 2019

Northern California casino offers a template for resilient microgrids

Solar power with batteries and backup generators provide weeks of self-reliance.

Codes and Standards | May 23, 2019

Austin creates innovative plan to boost affordable housing

Approach includes loosened zoning, incentives for higher density in lower-cost and mixed-income developments.

Codes and Standards | May 20, 2019

Effort launched to develop better process for zero-carbon retrofits in multifamily sector

Rocky Mountain Institute, Dept. of Energy, California Energy Commission join forces.

Codes and Standards | May 20, 2019

Property lenders shouldn’t invest for 30 years in most of Florida, expert warns

Climate ignorance driving some ‘insane’ deals.

Codes and Standards | May 17, 2019

NIMBYism is the biggest multifamily construction barrier

National Apartment Assn. report assesses reasons for difficulty in creating more apartments.

Codes and Standards | May 17, 2019

Dept. of Energy to award up to $33.5 million for advanced construction R&D

Focus is on techniques to reduce energy bills.

Codes and Standards | May 16, 2019

Mixed reviews on targeted tax break for San Francisco neighborhood

“Twitter tax break” may have worsened some of the area’s problems.

Codes and Standards | May 15, 2019

OSHA inspections to increase, says Secretary of Labor

Newly hired inspectors getting up to speed.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021