flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Have colleges/universities gone too far with "quality of life" buildings?

Have colleges/universities gone too far with "quality of life" buildings?


Rob Cassidy | November 12, 2012

We'd like your input - recent projects, photo/s, renderings, and expert insight - on an important article we're working on for our Jan 2013 issue:

HIGHER EDUCATION: Residence Halls, Student Unions, and ‘Quality of Life’ Factors in the Halls of Ivy

With total costs exceeding $50,000 at many colleges/universities, and with U.S. student debt nearing $1 trillion, will institutions be forced to cut back on "quality of campus life" buildings: residence halls that rival the Ritz, student unions and refectories that go well beyond the basics of bed and board, recreation centers that may seem over the top in their amenities? What about other "quality of campus life" buildings?
 
We're not talking about basic classroom, science & technology, or administrative buildings here. We're interested in those structures that are not, strictly speaking, essential to the curriculum or administration of the institution - those facilities that serve to enhance the "quality of campus life."
 
The essential question: Have colleges and universities gone too far with these structures? Or does competition for top students, institutional pride, or some other factor make it essential that institutions of higher learning keep raising the bar? And who's going to pay for these facilities?
 
Please send project information, PDFs, photo/s, renderings, and related information to our Contributing Editor, Susan Bady (susanbady@sbcglobal.net). 
 
Please also let Susan know the name and contact info (email, phone, office location) of your top expert on higher-ed facilities.
 
Deadline: Due to the Thanksgiving holiday, we'd like to get these materials by Friday, Nov 16, if possible.
 
Thanks for your help.
 
THE EDITORS

More from Author

Rob Cassidy | Oct 2, 2020

Everyone's getting a fire pit!

Skeleton fire pit in Chicago, October 2020

Rob Cassidy | Mar 30, 2020

Your turn: Has COVID-19 spelled the death knell for open-plan offices?

COVID-19 has designers worrying if open-plan offices are safe for workers.

Rob Cassidy | Mar 25, 2020

Coronavirus pandemic's impact on U.S. construction, notably the multifamily sector - 04-30-20 update

Coronavirus pandemic's impact on U.S. construction, notably the multifamily sector - 04-30-20 update

Rob Cassidy | Nov 20, 2019

Word of the Year: "climate emergency," says the Oxford English Dictionary

The Oxford Word of the Year 2019 is climate emergency.

Rob Cassidy | Nov 1, 2019

Do car-free downtown zones work? Oslo, yes; Chicago, no

Two recent reports (October 2019) explore whether car-free downtowns really work, based on experience in Oslo, Norway, and Chicago.

Rob Cassidy | Oct 9, 2019

Multifamily developers vs. Peloton: Round 2... Fight!

Readers and experts offer alternatives to Peloton bicycles for their apartment and condo projects.  

Rob Cassidy | Sep 4, 2019

Peloton to multifamily communities: Drop dead

Peloton will no longer sell its bikes to apartment communities.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




Reconsidering construction robotics

After decades when experts predicted that robots would become more prevalent on construction sites, it would appear that the industry has finally reached that point where necessity, aspiration, and investment are colliding. 

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021