Government work is scattered among dozens of federal civilian agencies, the Pentagon and the military branches, the 50 states, and tens of thousands of municipalities. The only thing these disparate entities have in common is a tight hold on their pocketbooks. With the federal stimulus having faded into the ether, and with state and municipal collections of sales and property taxes down, government construction at all levels will be slow to recover.“We’ll be lucky to see 2007 numbers by 2017,” says Margaret Bowker, Vice President, JE Dunn Construction.
Inside the Beltway, the GSA, the National Institutes of Health, the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are still posting RFPs, but there’s a sense that “spending has been put on hold to wait and see the outcome of the election,” says Barry Perkins, LEED AP BD+C, Vice President – Government Construction, James G. Davis Construction Corp.“Certainly the size and type of projects has changed, with more smaller renovations and retrofits than larger new construction,” he says.
SCROLL DOWN FOR GIANTS 300 GOVERNMENT FIRM RANKINGS
“We’re showing up to prebids and competing against firms that never used to pursue city or county work,” says Dennis Thompson, Executive Vice President for Business Development, Manhattan Construction Co. “Competition has increased five- or six-fold, so you see an erosion of fees.”
The result: “You have the same firms chasing a smaller pool of projects,” says Len Vetrone, Webcor Builders’ Senior Vice President for Public and Federal Work.
MAKING THE ADJUSTMENT TO GOVERNMENT WORK
For newbies to federal work, learning how to work with the bureaucracy can be an eye-opener. When the economy went into the tank in 2008, Pepper Construction Group took on its first two GSA projects—the renovation of the Mies van der Rohe-designed John C. Kluczynski Federal Building, in Chicago, and the John Weld Peck Federal Building, in Cincinnati.
“There’s just an enormous amount of paperwork, forms, and protocols that are required on government jobs compared to our private work,” says Senior Vice President Rich Tilghman, PE. “We have high-quality teams with lots of experience renovating large buildings in the private sector, and GSA recognized that,” he says, adding that the $100 million in revenue for the two projects was certainly welcome.
Even firms with decades of federal civilian and military experience have to keep constantly attuned to client needs. Reynolds Smith & Hills has been designing and maintaining facilities for NASA for 50 years. Recently, the firm replaced almost 10,000 square feet of windows in the Launch Control Center at the Kennedy Space Center, a highly sensitive project. “NASA is a wonderful client, always looking for innovative solutions, but you have to create a low-risk environment for them,” says RS&H Vice President Richard Hammett, AIA, LEED AP.
Public-private partnerships are “starting to catch on” at the state and local level, says Webcor Builders’ Vetrone. “We’re talking to some of the cities we work for in California which have major public projects with no funding, looking at how P3 could make those a reality,” he says. A recently awarded P3 for a courthouse in Long Beach has attracted a lot of interest from the local AEC community, he says.
Manhattan Construction’s Thompson says privatization seems to be gaining traction with some federal clients. His firm is serving as contracting partner in such a developer leaseback scheme for a VA clinic in Grand Rapids, Mich., with U.S. Federal Properties.
SOME BRIGHT SPOTS ON THE HORIZON
Even with budget cuts, there will still be public-sector jobs for AEC firms. For example, Webcor Builders’ Vetrone reports “a fair amount” of aviation projects in California. “The big work at LAX and Sacramento has been awarded, but SFO still has a fairly aggressive program,” he says.
Manhattan Construction’s Thompson says some state and local government agencies may be rethinking their procurement policies because “service and delivery quality have been affected” by their reliance on super-low bidders. “The trend is back to technical qualifications plus low price, but at least it’s not just low price,” he says.
Vetrone says Webcor Builders is being “pretty selective” as to which government projects it bids on. “We’re looking for clients who want to hire on a best-value basis, whether design-build or CM at risk, where your qualifications, technical competence, and people count as much as your price,” he says.
More commissioning of government and military buildings could also be a godsend for AEC firms. “We’ve done enhanced commissioning for the Air Force, and we’re finding that the buildings have a marked increase in performance,” says RS&H’s Hammett. “If anything was a no-brainer, commissioning would be it.”
Portfolio optimization is becoming much more important to governments at all levels, as they seek to reduce overhead while improving employee productivity. “They’re looking for a trifecta—asset preservation, sustainability, and innovative workplace solutions,” says Becky Greco, Principal, HGA Architects and Engineers. Public-sector clients want to emulate the corporate model of “better, faster, more cost-efficient,” she says.
Lisa Bottom, a Principal at Gensler, agrees. “Government workplaces are moving away from a hierarchical structure and embracing an open plan” based on actual space usage and employee mobility patterns, she says. The goal: flexible offices that will meet current and future needs of the workforce at all levels of government. +
TOP 25 GOVERNMENT SECTOR ARCHITECTURE FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 Government Revenue ($) |
1 | HOK | 143,334,571 |
2 | Heery International | 103,832,000 |
3 | SmithGroupJJR | 77,652,837 |
4 | IBI Group | 57,347,163 |
5 | Perkins+Will | 48,059,661 |
6 | HDR Architecture | 46,000,000 |
7 | EYP Architecture & Engineering | 40,892,580 |
8 | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill | 33,907,000 |
9 | HNTB Architecture | 31,338,712 |
10 | PageSoutherlandPage | 27,263,377 |
11 | NBBJ | 24,958,000 |
12 | LEO A DALY | 24,141,694 |
13 | Hammel, Green and Abrahamson | 24,028,000 |
14 | PGAL | 24,018,100 |
15 | Reynolds, Smith and Hills | 18,900,000 |
16 | ZGF Architects | 17,653,791 |
17 | RTKL Associates | 17,075,180 |
18 | DLR Group | 17,000,000 |
19 | Gensler | 17,000,000 |
20 | Moseley Architects | 13,700,000 |
21 | Beyer Blinder Belle Architects & Planners | 12,450,000 |
22 | Sasaki Associates | 12,356,441 |
23 | Cannon Design | 12,000,000 |
24 | KMD Architects | 11,913,372 |
25 | Fentress Architects | 11,830,262 |
TOP 25 GOVERNMENT SECTOR ENGINEERING FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 Government Revenue ($) |
1 | AECOM Technology Corp. | 2,485,000,000 |
2 | Fluor Corp. | 1,127,862,000 |
3 | Jacobs | 924,100,000 |
4 | URS Corp. | 309,987,000 |
5 | STV | 133,396,000 |
6 | Stantec | 117,000,000 |
7 | Dewberry | 57,006,253 |
8 | Atkins North America | 43,330,846 |
9 | Parsons Brinckerhoff | 35,515,523 |
10 | H&A Architects & Engineers | 31,641,856 |
11 | Michael Baker Jr., Inc. | 30,830,000 |
12 | Science Applications International Corp. | 15,431,116 |
13 | Walter P Moore | 12,531,123 |
14 | Coffman Engineers | 12,400,000 |
15 | SSOE Group | 12,321,198 |
16 | WSP USA | 10,900,000 |
17 | Arup | 10,580,870 |
18 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | 8,528,328 |
19 | Sebesta Blomberg | 8,450,225 |
20 | Interface Engineering | 8,103,067 |
21 | Walker Parking Consultants | 7,887,763 |
22 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | 7,800,000 |
23 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | 7,000,000 |
24 | RMF Engineering | 7,000,000 |
25 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | 6,936,000 |
TOP 25 GOVERNMENT SECTOR CONSTRUCTION FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 Government Revenue ($) |
1 | Turner Corporation, The | 2,268,320,925 |
2 | Jacobs | 924,100,000 |
3 | Clark Group | 850,491,577 |
4 | Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., The | 749,080,537 |
5 | Gilbane Building Co. | 736,199,000 |
6 | Hensel Phelps Construction | 669,080,000 |
7 | Walsh Group, The | 552,751,904 |
8 | Skanska USA | 550,758,448 |
9 | Webcor Builders | 484,567,966 |
10 | Tutor Perini | 385,311,000 |
11 | Balfour Beatty US | 341,774,742 |
12 | URS Corp. | 309,987,000 |
13 | Manhattan Construction Group | 274,683,334 |
14 | Alberici Corp. | 247,423,509 |
15 | PCL Construction Enterprises | 245,007,223 |
16 | Mortenson | 233,863,000 |
17 | Flintco | 223,200,000 |
18 | McCarthy Holdings | 218,000,000 |
19 | James G. Davis Construction | 208,000,000 |
20 | Yates Companies, The | 187,800,000 |
21 | Ryan Companies US | 156,858,437 |
22 | DPR Construction | 146,889,203 |
23 | JE Dunn Construction | 135,637,557 |
24 | Sundt Construction | 100,393,850 |
25 | CORE Construction | 94,340,532 |
Related Stories
K-12 Schools | Apr 30, 2024
Fully electric Oregon elementary school aims for resilience with microgrid design
The River Grove Elementary School in Oregon was designed for net-zero carbon and resiliency to seismic events, storms, and wildfire. The roughly 82,000-sf school in a Portland suburb will feature a microgrid—a small-scale power grid that operates independently from the area’s electric grid.
AEC Tech | Apr 30, 2024
Lack of organizational readiness is biggest hurdle to artificial intelligence adoption
Managers of companies in the industrial sector, including construction, have bought the hype of artificial intelligence (AI) as a transformative technology, but their organizations are not ready to realize its promise, according to research from IFS, a global cloud enterprise software company. An IFS survey of 1,700 senior decision-makers found that 84% of executives anticipate massive organizational benefits from AI.
Codes and Standards | Apr 30, 2024
Updated document details methods of testing fenestration for exterior walls
The Fenestration and Glazing Industry Alliance (FGIA) updated a document serving a recommended practice for determining test methodology for laboratory and field testing of exterior wall systems. The document pertains to products covered by an AAMA standard such as curtain walls, storefronts, window walls, and sloped glazing. AAMA 501-24, Methods of Test for Exterior Walls was last updated in 2015.
MFPRO+ News | Apr 29, 2024
World’s largest 3D printer could create entire neighborhoods
The University of Maine recently unveiled the world’s largest 3D printer said to be able to create entire neighborhoods. The machine is four times larger than a preceding model that was first tested in 2019. The older model was used to create a 600 sf single-family home made of recyclable wood fiber and bio-resin materials.
K-12 Schools | Apr 29, 2024
Tomorrow's classrooms: Designing schools for the digital age
In a world where technology’s rapid pace has reshaped how we live, work, and communicate, it should be no surprise that it’s also changing the PreK-12 education landscape.
Adaptive Reuse | Apr 29, 2024
6 characteristics of a successful adaptive reuse conversion
In the continuous battle against housing shortages and the surplus of vacant buildings, developers are turning their attention to the viability of adaptive reuse for their properties.
AEC Innovators | Apr 26, 2024
National Institute of Building Sciences announces Building Innovation 2024 schedule
The National Institute of Building Sciences is hosting its annual Building Innovation conference, May 22-24 at the Capital Hilton in Washington, D.C. BI2024 brings together everyone who impacts the built environment: government agencies, contractors, the private sector, architects, scientists, and more.
Mass Timber | Apr 25, 2024
Bjarke Ingels Group designs a mass timber cube structure for the University of Kansas
Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG) and executive architect BNIM have unveiled their design for a new mass timber cube structure called the Makers’ KUbe for the University of Kansas School of Architecture & Design. A six-story, 50,000-sf building for learning and collaboration, the light-filled KUbe will house studio and teaching space, 3D-printing and robotic labs, and a ground-level cafe, all organized around a central core.
Sports and Recreational Facilities | Apr 25, 2024
How pools can positively affect communities
Clark Nexsen senior architects Jennifer Heintz and Dorothea Schulz discuss how pools can create jobs, break down barriers, and create opportunities within communities.
Senior Living Design | Apr 24, 2024
Nation's largest Passive House senior living facility completed in Portland, Ore.
Construction of Parkview, a high-rise expansion of a Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) in Portland, Ore., completed recently. The senior living facility is touted as the largest Passive House structure on the West Coast, and the largest Passive House senior living building in the country.