Government work is scattered among dozens of federal civilian agencies, the Pentagon and the military branches, the 50 states, and tens of thousands of municipalities. The only thing these disparate entities have in common is a tight hold on their pocketbooks. With the federal stimulus having faded into the ether, and with state and municipal collections of sales and property taxes down, government construction at all levels will be slow to recover.“We’ll be lucky to see 2007 numbers by 2017,” says Margaret Bowker, Vice President, JE Dunn Construction.
Inside the Beltway, the GSA, the National Institutes of Health, the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are still posting RFPs, but there’s a sense that “spending has been put on hold to wait and see the outcome of the election,” says Barry Perkins, LEED AP BD+C, Vice President – Government Construction, James G. Davis Construction Corp.“Certainly the size and type of projects has changed, with more smaller renovations and retrofits than larger new construction,” he says.
SCROLL DOWN FOR GIANTS 300 GOVERNMENT FIRM RANKINGS
“We’re showing up to prebids and competing against firms that never used to pursue city or county work,” says Dennis Thompson, Executive Vice President for Business Development, Manhattan Construction Co. “Competition has increased five- or six-fold, so you see an erosion of fees.”
The result: “You have the same firms chasing a smaller pool of projects,” says Len Vetrone, Webcor Builders’ Senior Vice President for Public and Federal Work.
MAKING THE ADJUSTMENT TO GOVERNMENT WORK
For newbies to federal work, learning how to work with the bureaucracy can be an eye-opener. When the economy went into the tank in 2008, Pepper Construction Group took on its first two GSA projects—the renovation of the Mies van der Rohe-designed John C. Kluczynski Federal Building, in Chicago, and the John Weld Peck Federal Building, in Cincinnati.
“There’s just an enormous amount of paperwork, forms, and protocols that are required on government jobs compared to our private work,” says Senior Vice President Rich Tilghman, PE. “We have high-quality teams with lots of experience renovating large buildings in the private sector, and GSA recognized that,” he says, adding that the $100 million in revenue for the two projects was certainly welcome.
Even firms with decades of federal civilian and military experience have to keep constantly attuned to client needs. Reynolds Smith & Hills has been designing and maintaining facilities for NASA for 50 years. Recently, the firm replaced almost 10,000 square feet of windows in the Launch Control Center at the Kennedy Space Center, a highly sensitive project. “NASA is a wonderful client, always looking for innovative solutions, but you have to create a low-risk environment for them,” says RS&H Vice President Richard Hammett, AIA, LEED AP.
Public-private partnerships are “starting to catch on” at the state and local level, says Webcor Builders’ Vetrone. “We’re talking to some of the cities we work for in California which have major public projects with no funding, looking at how P3 could make those a reality,” he says. A recently awarded P3 for a courthouse in Long Beach has attracted a lot of interest from the local AEC community, he says.
Manhattan Construction’s Thompson says privatization seems to be gaining traction with some federal clients. His firm is serving as contracting partner in such a developer leaseback scheme for a VA clinic in Grand Rapids, Mich., with U.S. Federal Properties.
SOME BRIGHT SPOTS ON THE HORIZON
Even with budget cuts, there will still be public-sector jobs for AEC firms. For example, Webcor Builders’ Vetrone reports “a fair amount” of aviation projects in California. “The big work at LAX and Sacramento has been awarded, but SFO still has a fairly aggressive program,” he says.
Manhattan Construction’s Thompson says some state and local government agencies may be rethinking their procurement policies because “service and delivery quality have been affected” by their reliance on super-low bidders. “The trend is back to technical qualifications plus low price, but at least it’s not just low price,” he says.
Vetrone says Webcor Builders is being “pretty selective” as to which government projects it bids on. “We’re looking for clients who want to hire on a best-value basis, whether design-build or CM at risk, where your qualifications, technical competence, and people count as much as your price,” he says.
More commissioning of government and military buildings could also be a godsend for AEC firms. “We’ve done enhanced commissioning for the Air Force, and we’re finding that the buildings have a marked increase in performance,” says RS&H’s Hammett. “If anything was a no-brainer, commissioning would be it.”
Portfolio optimization is becoming much more important to governments at all levels, as they seek to reduce overhead while improving employee productivity. “They’re looking for a trifecta—asset preservation, sustainability, and innovative workplace solutions,” says Becky Greco, Principal, HGA Architects and Engineers. Public-sector clients want to emulate the corporate model of “better, faster, more cost-efficient,” she says.
Lisa Bottom, a Principal at Gensler, agrees. “Government workplaces are moving away from a hierarchical structure and embracing an open plan” based on actual space usage and employee mobility patterns, she says. The goal: flexible offices that will meet current and future needs of the workforce at all levels of government. +
TOP 25 GOVERNMENT SECTOR ARCHITECTURE FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 Government Revenue ($) |
1 | HOK | 143,334,571 |
2 | Heery International | 103,832,000 |
3 | SmithGroupJJR | 77,652,837 |
4 | IBI Group | 57,347,163 |
5 | Perkins+Will | 48,059,661 |
6 | HDR Architecture | 46,000,000 |
7 | EYP Architecture & Engineering | 40,892,580 |
8 | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill | 33,907,000 |
9 | HNTB Architecture | 31,338,712 |
10 | PageSoutherlandPage | 27,263,377 |
11 | NBBJ | 24,958,000 |
12 | LEO A DALY | 24,141,694 |
13 | Hammel, Green and Abrahamson | 24,028,000 |
14 | PGAL | 24,018,100 |
15 | Reynolds, Smith and Hills | 18,900,000 |
16 | ZGF Architects | 17,653,791 |
17 | RTKL Associates | 17,075,180 |
18 | DLR Group | 17,000,000 |
19 | Gensler | 17,000,000 |
20 | Moseley Architects | 13,700,000 |
21 | Beyer Blinder Belle Architects & Planners | 12,450,000 |
22 | Sasaki Associates | 12,356,441 |
23 | Cannon Design | 12,000,000 |
24 | KMD Architects | 11,913,372 |
25 | Fentress Architects | 11,830,262 |
TOP 25 GOVERNMENT SECTOR ENGINEERING FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 Government Revenue ($) |
1 | AECOM Technology Corp. | 2,485,000,000 |
2 | Fluor Corp. | 1,127,862,000 |
3 | Jacobs | 924,100,000 |
4 | URS Corp. | 309,987,000 |
5 | STV | 133,396,000 |
6 | Stantec | 117,000,000 |
7 | Dewberry | 57,006,253 |
8 | Atkins North America | 43,330,846 |
9 | Parsons Brinckerhoff | 35,515,523 |
10 | H&A Architects & Engineers | 31,641,856 |
11 | Michael Baker Jr., Inc. | 30,830,000 |
12 | Science Applications International Corp. | 15,431,116 |
13 | Walter P Moore | 12,531,123 |
14 | Coffman Engineers | 12,400,000 |
15 | SSOE Group | 12,321,198 |
16 | WSP USA | 10,900,000 |
17 | Arup | 10,580,870 |
18 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | 8,528,328 |
19 | Sebesta Blomberg | 8,450,225 |
20 | Interface Engineering | 8,103,067 |
21 | Walker Parking Consultants | 7,887,763 |
22 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | 7,800,000 |
23 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | 7,000,000 |
24 | RMF Engineering | 7,000,000 |
25 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | 6,936,000 |
TOP 25 GOVERNMENT SECTOR CONSTRUCTION FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 Government Revenue ($) |
1 | Turner Corporation, The | 2,268,320,925 |
2 | Jacobs | 924,100,000 |
3 | Clark Group | 850,491,577 |
4 | Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., The | 749,080,537 |
5 | Gilbane Building Co. | 736,199,000 |
6 | Hensel Phelps Construction | 669,080,000 |
7 | Walsh Group, The | 552,751,904 |
8 | Skanska USA | 550,758,448 |
9 | Webcor Builders | 484,567,966 |
10 | Tutor Perini | 385,311,000 |
11 | Balfour Beatty US | 341,774,742 |
12 | URS Corp. | 309,987,000 |
13 | Manhattan Construction Group | 274,683,334 |
14 | Alberici Corp. | 247,423,509 |
15 | PCL Construction Enterprises | 245,007,223 |
16 | Mortenson | 233,863,000 |
17 | Flintco | 223,200,000 |
18 | McCarthy Holdings | 218,000,000 |
19 | James G. Davis Construction | 208,000,000 |
20 | Yates Companies, The | 187,800,000 |
21 | Ryan Companies US | 156,858,437 |
22 | DPR Construction | 146,889,203 |
23 | JE Dunn Construction | 135,637,557 |
24 | Sundt Construction | 100,393,850 |
25 | CORE Construction | 94,340,532 |
Related Stories
Laboratories | May 24, 2024
The Department of Energy breaks ground on the Princeton Plasma Innovation Center
In Princeton, N.J., the U.S. Department of Energy’s Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) has broken ground on the Princeton Plasma Innovation Center (PPIC), a state-of-the-art office and laboratory building. Designed and constructed by SmithGroup, the $109.7 million facility will provide space for research supporting PPPL’s expanded mission into microelectronics, quantum sensors and devices, and sustainability sciences.
MFPRO+ News | May 24, 2024
Austin, Texas, outlaws windowless bedrooms
Austin, Texas will no longer allow developers to build windowless bedrooms. For at least two decades, the city had permitted developers to build thousands of windowless bedrooms.
Resiliency | May 24, 2024
As temperatures underground rise, so do risks to commercial buildings
Heat created by underground structures is increasing the risk of damage to buildings, recent studies have found. Basements, train tunnels, sewers, and other underground systems are making the ground around them warmer, which causes soil, sand, clay and silt to shift, settle, contract, and expand.
Sports and Recreational Facilities | May 23, 2024
The Cincinnati Open will undergo a campus-wide renovation ahead of the expanded 2025 tournament
One of the longest-running tennis tournaments in the country, the Cincinnati Open will add a 2,000-seat stadium, new courts and player center, and more greenspace to create a park-like atmosphere.
Mass Timber | May 22, 2024
3 mass timber architecture innovations
As mass timber construction evolves from the first decade of projects, we're finding an increasing variety of mass timber solutions. Here are three primary examples.
MFPRO+ News | May 21, 2024
Massachusetts governor launches advocacy group to push for more housing
Massachusetts’ Gov. Maura Healey and Lt. Gov. Kim Driscoll have taken the unusual step of setting up a nonprofit to advocate for pro-housing efforts at the local level. One Commonwealth Inc., will work to provide political and financial support for local housing initiatives, a key pillar of the governor’s agenda.
Building Tech | May 21, 2024
In a world first, load-bearing concrete walls built with a 3D printer
A Germany-based construction engineering company says it has constructed the world’s first load-bearing concrete walls built with a 3D printer. Züblin built a new warehouse from a single 3D print for Strabag Baumaschinentechnik International in Stuttgart, Germany using a Putzmeister 3D printer.
MFPRO+ News | May 21, 2024
Baker Barrios Architects announces new leadership roles for multifamily, healthcare design
Baker Barrios Architects announced two new additions to its leadership: Chris Powers, RA, AIA, NCARB, EDAC, as Associate Principal and Director (Healthcare); and Mark Kluemper, AIA, NCARB, as Associate Principal and Technical Director (Multifamily).
MFPRO+ News | May 20, 2024
Florida condo market roiled by structural safety standards law
A Florida law enacted after the Surfside condo tower collapse is causing turmoil in the condominium market. The law, which requires buildings to meet certain structural safety standards, is forcing condo associations to assess hefty fees to make repairs on older properties. In some cases, the cost per unit runs into six figures.
Office Buildings | May 20, 2024
10 spaces that are no longer optional to create a great workplace
Amenities are no longer optional. The new role of the office is not only a place to get work done, but to provide a mix of work experiences for employees.