Predictable, flexible, and efficient, prefabrication is quickly becoming an integral part of many construction projects. Though not a one-size-fits-all solution, prefabrication can address a multitude of common challenges—particularly as schedules continue accelerating, while labor capacity is decreasing.
From jobsite issues and location constraints to sequencing and scheduling, each project comes with a unique set of challenges, requiring a tailored solution on a per-project basis. While prefabrication, its utilization, and the approach differ for each project, the results and benefits for owners are consistent.
Is prefabrication right for my construction project and how can I plan for success? There are many factors requiring careful consideration when determining whether a project is a good fit for prefabrication and optimizing a project’s prefabrication plans.
Owner requirements
- Owner prefabrication expectations — Some owners, particularly in certain industries such as mission critical and healthcare, have prefabrication parameters that teams must work within. For example, when owners have multiple projects in the pipeline, it is becoming more common that prefabricated products may be bulk purchased for multiple projects.
“We’re seeing more bulk purchasing of premanufactured components,” said Prefabrication Integration Director Sara Curry. “For instance, a healthcare client recently bought bathroom pods for five jobs at the same time and will store them until each job needs them. This is one example of how owner programs can impact project delivery.” Many owners also have directives to track and meet predetermined off-site goals. - Matrix of responsibility — To meet all requirements, there needs to be a clear matrix of OFCI/OFOI responsibility for both the owner-furnished equipment and modular or premanufactured components.
Construction type
- Construction type can significantly impact prefabrication, whether to utilize it, and to what extent. But ultimately, all project types—greenfield, expansions, renovations and buildouts—can be good candidates for prefabrication.
Team Assembly
- Getting team members on board during design to explore potential options and plan ahead for optimal prefabrication outcomes is crucial. This ensures alignment of goals, expectations, accountabilities, plans and efficient execution from start to finish.
Budgets
- With current cost escalation and evolving economic conditions, teams can gain cost certainty by finalizing decisions and purchasing components and materials for fabrication sooner.
- Since a premium could be associated with certain prefabrication plans, teams should ensure prefabrication/modularization costs align with project goals, such as speed to market.
Design optimization
- Design optimization, or designing for prefabrication, enables contract documents to clearly articulate the scope of each prefabricated or modular component, including where conventional methods will be required for complete, efficient installation.
Logistics
- Laydown, the logistics of loading different sized components into and throughout the building, and onsite storage plans must be carefully considered.
Trade Partner Expertise
- Assess trade partners’ prefabrication capabilities and their offsite facilities to ensure alignment with the project’s needs.
- Depending upon local labor availability and expertise, remote prefabrication and long-distance transportation to the jobsite should be considered.
What pain points can prefabrication solve?
The enhanced collaboration and planning associated with prefabrication help mitigate project risks and address a range of potential pain points throughout design and construction.
Cost escalation and supply chain challenges. Offsite construction can help mitigate some of today’s common—and unpredictable—challenges, such as cost escalation, long procurement lead times, and labor shortages by identifying these issues early enough to address them before they can affect the project.
Jobsite issues. From organizing and storing equipment, to coordinating trades to maximize efficiency and space, shifting work offsite for prefabrication can help alleviate common jobsite issues, including site cleanliness and safety, materials storage, delivery inefficiencies, onsite traffic and congestion, and trade stacking.
Scheduling. The decision to utilize prefabrication affects the entire project, requiring design and construction teams to collaborate earlier, ultimately driving schedule efficiencies. While offsite construction typically increases the time required during design to coordinate certain components, the effect is a positive one that yields efficiencies throughout the entire construction process.
“The additional design coordination provides more opportunities to catch issues earlier. This helps alleviate the need for additional coordination after construction documents are issued. Additionally, by starting earlier we can fine tune other factors affecting the overall schedule and speed to market, such as delivery of premanufactured components and sequencing of installation,” said Curry.
RELATED STORIES
- Onsite prefabrication for healthcare construction
- 3 ways prefabrication doubles as a sustainability strategy
- Modular electric rooms are the new normal
What are the prefabrication options?
As prefabrication continues to evolve and its use increases, the options are expanding as well. From comprehensive modular systems to smaller, repeatable components, prefabricated approaches can be scaled and implemented appropriately depending on owners’ and projects’ needs.
Full modular buildings/systems — Completely fit out sections of a building (e.g., a fully finished hotel room or sections of a hospital patient wing); these are turnkey, fully finished products that are simply put in place and connected.
Modular components — Hotel or hospital bathroom pods, electrical rooms, central energy plants/central utility plants
Assemblies — Hospital patient room headwalls and footwalls, multi-trade MEP racks (vertical and horizontal), exterior skin panels
Sub-assemblies — Corridor top out walls, panelized roof systems, pre-clad frame systems (for items like trash enclosers, equipment screens, gates, fences, etc.), temporary items (formwork, enclosers, safety items, protection, access, etc.)
Kit of parts — While some prefabricated components are delivered to the site assembled and ready for installation, another option is to break components down into a “kit of parts” that can be easily assembled onsite to increase efficiency.
“Delivering kits to the jobsite, with parts cut to size, eliminates room for error, enhances quality, and increases efficiency since the process is repeatable and precise,” said Effenheim. “Complete kits—that start with structural components and take a job or scope all the way through finishes—and collated kits—turning basic parts into kits by work area—are great ways to utilize offsite construction for smaller-scale components.”
What are some common prefabrication challenges to avoid?
Put simply, when it comes to prefabrication, timing is everything. Not only is timing of team assembly essential, but the timing of other tasks also plays a critical role in successfully leveraging prefabrication.
Material and equipment selection. Since offsite prefabrication can occur ahead of and concurrently with onsite, conventional construction, decisions must be made and materials must be procured earlier for prefabricated elements to avoid delays and inefficiencies.
Decisions and design changes. Major design changes can have a ripple effect on prefabricated components. “If decisions or the design change after prefabrication starts, timing and cost are affected across the board,” said Senior Superintendent-Prefabrication Nick Effenheim. “Changes can require resequencing of prefab component deliveries, for example, and affect the project schedule. This could then cause double-handling and potentially additional storage costs—meaning one late design change impacts multiple phases of the project.”
Validating existing conditions. Capturing existing conditions with laser scanning on renovation projects can help coordination of the design. “On renovations, existing conditions and verification of space must be completed to ensure prefabricated components will conform with the space. For example, existing systems in a space may make it difficult to install above ceiling multi-trade MEP rack systems,” said Curry.
Licensing. This up-front planning work also applies to licensing. Ensuring the selected modular manufacturer(s) are following local jurisdiction requirements for inspections prior to shipment can save significant time and head off potential delays.
Procurement strategy. To have the greatest impact, when it comes to timing, offsite construction needs to be accounted for before scopes are written. The additional planning and design needed to incorporate prefabrication requires earlier scopes than owners are typically accustomed to. But when an owner’s design team is on board and is part of the design coordination process with the trade partners building the offsite components, how components get built and overall schedule efficiencies are positively impacted.
What does the future hold for prefabrication?
Perhaps the best thing about prefabrication is not simply the benefits or efficiency it offers, but rather the possibilities that are still being realized.
“Schedules are getting more compressed and labor shortages are getting worse,” said Curry. “But those constraints are helping drive innovation and learning. They’re helping us embrace manufacturing best practices and pushing us to be smarter about the way we build. As we continue changing the way we build, we’ll also continue to reap the benefits of these innovations.”
About the Author
Brian Burkett is a Vice President with JE Dunn Construction, based in the firm's Kansas City, Mo., office.
Related Stories
| Dec 17, 2010
Arizona outpatient cancer center to light a ‘lantern of hope’
Construction of the Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center in Gilbert, Ariz., is under way. Located on the Banner Gateway Medical Center campus near Phoenix, the three-story, 131,000-sf outpatient facility will house radiation oncology, outpatient imaging, multi-specialty clinics, infusion therapy, and various support services. Cannon Design incorporated a signature architectural feature called the “lantern of hope” for the $90 million facility.
| Dec 17, 2010
Cladding Do’s and Don’ts
A veteran structural engineer offers expert advice on how to avoid problems with stone cladding and glass/aluminum cladding systems.
| Dec 17, 2010
5 Tips on Building with SIPs
Structural insulated panels are gaining the attention of Building Teams interested in achieving high-performance building envelopes in commercial, industrial, and institutional projects.
| Dec 17, 2010
How to Win More University Projects
University architects representing four prominent institutions of higher learning tell how your firm can get the inside track on major projects.
| Dec 13, 2010
Energy efficiency No. 1 priority for commercial office tenants
Green building initiatives are a key influencer when tenants decide to sign a commercial real estate lease, according to a survey by GE Capital Real Estate. The survey, which was conducted over the past year and included more than 2,220 office tenants in the U.S., Canada, France, Germany, Sweden, the UK, Spain, and Japan, shows that energy efficiency remains the No. 1 priority in most countries. Also ranking near the top: waste reduction programs and indoor air.
| Dec 7, 2010
Are green building RFPs more important than contracts?
The Request for Proposal (RFP) process is key to managing a successful LEED project, according to Green Building Law Update. While most people think a contract is the key element to a successful construction project, successfully managing a LEED project requires a clear RFP that addresses many of the problems that can lead to litigation.
| Dec 7, 2010
Blue is the future of green design
Blue design creates places that are not just neutral, but actually add back to the world and is the future of sustainable design and architecture, according to an interview with Paul Eagle, managing director of Perkins+Will, New York; and Janice Barnes, principal at the firm and global discipline leader for planning and strategies.
| Dec 7, 2010
Green building thrives in shaky economy
Green building’s momentum hasn’t been stopped by the economic recession and will keep speeding through the recovery, while at the same time building owners are looking to go green more for economic reasons than environmental ones. Green building has grown 50% in the past two years; total construction starts have shrunk 26% over the same time period, according to “Green Outlook 2011” report. The green-building sector is expected to nearly triple by 2015, representing as much as $145 billion in new construction activity.
| Dec 7, 2010
USGBC: Wood-certification benchmarks fail to pass
The proposed Forest Certification Benchmark to determine when wood-certification groups would have their certification qualify for points in the LEED rating systemdid not pass the USGBC member ballot. As a result, the Certified Wood credit in LEED will remain as it is currently written. To date, only wood certified by the Forest Stewardship Council qualifies for a point in the LEED, while other organizations, such as the Sustainable Forestry Initiative, the Canadian Standards Association, and the American Tree Farm System, are excluded.