flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Washington state building codes to protect structures from wildfire provoke controversy

Codes and Standards

Washington state building codes to protect structures from wildfire provoke controversy

Critics concerned over cost and possibility of too many trees being cut down


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | November 10, 2023
Image by Chil Vera from Pixabay
Image by Chil Vera from Pixabay

New building codes in Washington state intended to protect structures from wildfires are provoking backlash from builders, cities, and environmentalists.

Critics charge that the rules that are scheduled to take effect March 15 are confusing, will increase housing costs, and could cause too many trees to be cut down. The law’s guidelines apply to new construction and remodels, and require roofs, siding, decks, doors, windows, and other parts of homes to be made from fire-resistant material.

The law also requires “defensible space” between a structure and the surrounding vegetation. Defensible space ranges from 30 to 100 feet, depending on factors including building materials, water availability for firefighting, and road access near the structure. Trees planted in the defensible zone must be at least 10 feet apart and 10 feet away from structures.

Opponents say that the map that guides which areas are subject to the new rules includes too many places that are actually low risk. A building industry group estimated the new rules would add at least $4,300 to the cost of a home.

Related Stories

| May 19, 2014

Construction skilled-worker shortage causing rise in claims

The improved economy has boosted construction starts, but a shortage of experienced trade workers has led to more on-the-job injuries and construction defects.

| May 15, 2014

AISC Prequalified Seismic Moment Connection standard update now available

The AISC standard Prequalified Moment Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications (ANSI/AISC 358-10) has been updated with a second supplement, ANSI/AISC 358s2-14.

| May 15, 2014

ConsensusDocs releases new agreements for contractors who hire consultants

ConsensusDocs has released the new ConsensusDocs 746 Constructor & Geotechnical Consultant Agreement and the 747 Constructor & Consultant Agreement.

| May 8, 2014

Report: Top storm-resilient cities have high adaptive capacity

The most resilient cities in the world, including five in the U.S., have attributes that would enable them to recover better than others from devastating natural disasters.

| May 8, 2014

LED lighting helps cities receive Energy Star designation

Thanks largely to an ambitious program to boost the use of LED lighting in its buildings, Los Angeles is the top ranked U.S. city on the Environmental Protection Agency’s annual list of U.S. cities that are doing the most to improve energy efficiency.

| May 8, 2014

Door knob code revisions generating controversy

The City of Vancouver’s ban on doorknobs in all new buildings, which went into effect last month, has drawn a strong reaction from the public and heated debate across Canada as other jurisdictions consider the measure.

| May 8, 2014

Structural concrete code revisions open for public comments

The American Concrete Institute’s completely reorganized ACI 318-14, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary,” is open for public review for a 45-day period.

| May 3, 2014

Controversy rages over cost, benefits of proposed OSHA silica dust rule

Introduced in August 2013, the proposal would lower allowable levels of crystalline silica in all workplaces, standardize how the dust is calculated, and require medical monitoring for employees exposed to high levels.

| May 3, 2014

California’s Title 24 promises to reshape the construction industry

California’s recent revisions to Title 24 contain ambitious performance goals: all residential buildings must be Zero Net Energy by 2020 and commercial buildings must reach that standard by 2030.

| Apr 30, 2014

House Appropriations Committee approves $3 billion cut for military construction

The Army would see the sharpest cuts on a percentage basis, with a $578 million, or 52% reduction in FY 2015.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021