flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

U.S. Open stadium’s new retractable roof showcases innovative problem solving in its design and engineering

Sports and Recreational Facilities

U.S. Open stadium’s new retractable roof showcases innovative problem solving in its design and engineering

Mushy ground and indoor condensation were just two of the issues this $150 million project presented to its Building Team. 


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | September 1, 2016

The retractable roof over Arthur Ashe stadium at the National Tennis Center in New York is a freestanding, 6,500-ton structure whose moveable panels can enclose the facility in seven minutes. Image: USTA/Michael LeBrecht II

As the U.S. Open Grand Slam tennis tournament in New York moves into its second week, the massive retractable roof over the 23,711-seat Arthur Ashe stadium has been drawing oohs and aahs from players and fans alike.

The $150 million roof addition is part of a $550 million renovation of the Billie Jean King National Tennis Center in Flushing, Queens. The roof itself was five years in the making, and posed several structural and engineering challenges to the Building Team, which included the architect Rossetti, the engineering firm WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff, and the general contractor Hunt Construction Group.

This morning, BD+C interviewed WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff execs Ahmad Rahimian, P.E., SE, F.ASCE, director of Building Structures; and Yoram Eilon, P.E., Senior Vice President of Building Structures, about this project.

Rahimian noted that any stadium construction or renovation is complicated. This one, though, was unique in several ways. For one thing, there was no precedent to draw upon in the tennis world, as Arthur Ashe is by far the largest stadium on the tour. And that facility, which opened in August 1977, wasn’t designed to include a roof.

Rahimian said that the U.S. Tennis Association (USTA), which owns and operates the venue and annual event, actually started thinking about a roof three years after the stadium opened. Those plans became more urgent in 2008, when rain interfered with the completion of some matches. Since then, rain has been a perennial threat, and occasional impediment, to the tournament’s scheduling. Design discussions for a roof began around 2011, he said.

Given the stadium’s age and structural condition, the Building Team concluded that the best solution would be to build a freestanding structure for the retractable roof that doesn’t touch the stadium itself. (There’s a 15-inch gap between the stadium and the roof pavilion.)

That roof structure sits on eight super-steel columns and 16 great brace angles that rise 125 feet above ground level, and support an 80-foot-high Teflon-covered membrane and two 500-ton panels that move back and forth over a 62,500-sf opening.

The retractable panels move on wheel assemblies mounted on rails, and can be opened or closed by cables and winches in only seven minutes.

The National Tennis Center is located in a marshy part of Queens, so the Building Team had to find answers to soil issues in order to support a roof pavilion that would weigh 6,500 tons. The steel columns are organized in an octagonal pattern that corresponds to the shape of the stadium. Each column is mounted on a concrete pier that spreads the weight load of the pavilion onto an underground concrete slab. That platform is supported by pilings that go as deeply as 180 feet into the ground.

Eilon noted, though, that this wasn’t a simple drilling job, as there are massive amounts of utilities infrastructure underground that needed to be circumvented or rerouted, not to mention the subway and Long Island Railroad systems nearby.

In addition, construction shut down during the two weeks of the tournament, which meant that cranes had to be taken down or relocated.

(Despite New York’s reputation for being a difficult place to get construction done, Rahimiam and Eilon said the city wasn’t at all intrusive. “I think they understood the significance of this to the city,” says Eilon.)

 

Even when the roof is open, 60% of the stadium's 23,771 seats are shaded. Image: USTA/Jennifer Pottheiser

 

Even when the roof is open, at least 60% of the stadium seats are shaded. To mitigate condensation and to ventilate the stadium when the roof is closed, the Building Team installed 16 air diffusers along a six-foot-wide duct that encompasses the top of the stadium, the WSP execs confirmed. As cooled air drops into the bowl of the stadium, it’s expelled by mechanical fans.

Rahimian and Eilon say that despite all this HVAC equipment, the stadium is relatively quiet when the roof is closed, although that enclosure does tends the magnify ambient sounds from the audience, which at the U.S. Open are pretty noticeable to begin with. 

USTA had budgeted about $100 million for the roof project, but dealing with structural support, condensation, and ventilation tacked on another $50 million to the price tag, says Rahimian.

WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff is involved in other facets of the National Tennis Center’s renovation, which will include an expanded Grandstand stadium. Whether other sports stadiums embrace retractable roofs, though, remains to be seen. Roland Garros, the location of the French Open in Paris, intends to install a retractable roof to cover its Court Philippe Chatrier, although construction has been pushed back to 2020 at the earliest, according to Tennis Magazine.

Rahimian believes retractable roofs help venues to “justify” their brands, and he expects more projects like these in the future. “I think it’s a trend.”

Related Stories

Sports and Recreational Facilities | Dec 15, 2023

San Antonio Spurs’ new practice facility aims to help players win championships and maintain well-being

Designed by ZGF, the Victory Capital Performance Center uses biophilic design to promote better health and wellness on and off the court.

Giants 400 | Oct 17, 2023

Top 70 Sports Facility Construction Firms for 2023

AECOM, Turner Construction, Clark Group, Mortenson head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest sports facility contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Oct 17, 2023

Top 130 Sports Facility Architecture Firms for 2023

Populous, Gensler, HOK, and HKS head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest sports facility architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Contractors | Sep 25, 2023

Balfour Beatty expands its operations in Tampa Bay, Fla.

Balfour Beatty is expanding its leading construction operations into the Tampa Bay area offering specialized and expert services to deliver premier projects along Florida’s Gulf Coast.

Mixed-Use | Sep 20, 2023

Tampa Bay Rays, Hines finalize deal for a stadium-anchored multiuse district in St. Petersburg, Fla.

The Tampa Bay Rays Major League Baseball team announced that it has reached an agreement with St. Petersburg and Pinellas County on a $6.5 billion, 86-acre mixed-use development that will include a new 30,000-seat ballpark and an array of office, housing, hotel, retail, and restaurant space totaling 8 million sf.

Sports and Recreational Facilities | Sep 1, 2023

New Tennessee Titans stadium conceived to maximize types of events that can be hosted

The new Tennessee Titans stadium was conceived to maximize the number and type of events that the facility can host. In addition to serving as the home of the NFL’s Titans, the facility will be a venue for numerous other sporting, entertainment, and civic events. The 1.7-million sf, 60,000-seat, fully enclosed stadium will be built on the east side of the current stadium campus. 

Adaptive Reuse | Aug 31, 2023

Small town takes over big box

GBBN associate Claire Shafer, AIA, breaks down the firm's recreational adaptive reuse project for a small Indiana town.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2023

Top 115 Architecture Engineering Firms for 2023

Stantec, HDR, Page, HOK, and Arcadis North America top the rankings of the nation's largest architecture engineering (AE) firms for nonresidential building and multifamily housing work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2023

2023 Giants 400 Report: Ranking the nation's largest architecture, engineering, and construction firms

A record 552 AEC firms submitted data for BD+C's 2023 Giants 400 Report. The final report includes 137 rankings across 25 building sectors and specialty categories.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2023

Top 175 Architecture Firms for 2023

Gensler, HKS, Perkins&Will, Corgan, and Perkins Eastman top the rankings of the nation's largest architecture firms for nonresidential building and multifamily housing work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




Mixed-Use

A surging master-planned community in Utah gets its own entertainment district

Since its construction began two decades ago, Daybreak, the 4,100-acre master-planned community in South Jordan, Utah, has been a catalyst and model for regional growth. The latest addition is a 200-acre mixed-use entertainment district that will serve as a walkable and bikeable neighborhood within the community, anchored by a minor-league baseball park and a cinema/entertainment complex.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021