flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

U.S. engineering firms set sail for foreign ports

U.S. engineering firms set sail for foreign ports

Other E/EA Giants 300 firms are just dipping their toes into foreign waters, still looking for international business but choosing not to establish additional offices.


By By Nicole Bowling, Associate Editor | July 18, 2012
The Past Worlds Terrace at the Natural History Museum of Utah, a $103 million, 1
The Past Worlds Terrace at the Natural History Museum of Utah, a $103 million, 163,000-sf LEED Gold research museum with 1.2 mil
This article first appeared in the July 2012 issue of BD+C.

Engineering firms and engineering/architecture firms—those that earn more than 50% of their revenues from engineering—have their sights set on foreign shores. Many are jumping headfirst into international waters.

“Instead of overseeing projects from New York, our firm has established offices in Mumbai, Moscow, and other cities outside North America, aiming to overcome the challenge of navigating the local landscape or hiring practices, tax law, and business practices,” says Thomas Z. Scarangello, PE, CEO and Chairman of EA Giant Thornton Tomasetti.

Other firms are just dipping their toes into foreign waters, still looking for international business but choosing not to establish additional offices. Brad Harmsen, AIA, Chairman/CEO of BRPH, says that although his firm is actively working in locales across the globe, they’re partnering with domestic firms to do so, partly because of “the learning curve that comes when working with different currencies and legalities.”

SCROLL DOWN FOR GIANTS 300 ENGINEERING & ENGINEERING/ARCHITECTURE FIRM RANKINGS


Shanghai and Dubai are hot spots for E and EA Giants these days. Glumac, Magnusson Klemencic Associates, and Syska Hennessy Group have opened or expanded their offices in Shanghai. KJWW and Syska Hennessy opened new offices in Dubai. Thornton Tomasetti bucked the trend and opened offices in Beijing and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, while Arup Americas opened new offices in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, just in time for soccer’s World Cup in 2014.

Establishing an office abroad is one thing; getting the business is something entirely different. Referring specifically to the Middle East, Paul VanDuyne, PE, president of KJWW, says, “It takes approximately two years to develop the appropriate relationships, name recognition, and reputation to be successful in obtaining projects in this region.”

Despite the difficulties, an increasingly large share of engineering Giants’ yearly revenue is coming from international projects. Magnusson Klemencic President Ron Klemencic, PE, SE, says that 20-30% of MKA’s gross revenue comes from international business, while KJWW anticipates that 10% of its 2013 revenue will come from international projects. Syska Hennessy Group’s goal is to beef up its international activity by 25% over the next five years.

KEY ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY

Beyond establishing an international presence, technology is also a crucial differentiator for E and EA Giants firms.

Syska Hennessy Group’s new Information and Communications Technology group is offering an expanded scope of services for organizations looking to upgrade their IT platforms with the latest technologies. “Our new offerings include tools and expertise to apply virtualization of existing client environments, data center relocation management, disaster recovery and IT security services, and network and Internet/intranet design and implementation,” said Co-CEO/Co-president Cyrus J. Izzo, PE.

Thornton Tomasetti launched a new Building Sustainability practice in January and now offers LEED consulting and administration, energy and daylight modeling, and sustainable business strategies. The firm also has an advanced computational modeling team; it leverages new technologies by developing custom digital tools that utilize generative and parametric modeling, which enables its engineers to collaborate more effectively with architects in the early phases of design.

HELPING CLIENTS FIND THE MONEY FOR PROJECTS

New financing solutions are also playing a part in E/EA Giants’ business strategies. With the U.S. construction market still in recovery, alternative financing methods are being sought out to help clients put together the dollars they need to complete projects.

At Syska Hennessy Group, public-private partnerships are on the radar. “We are observing an increase in P3 projects across geographies and market sectors,” said Syska Hennessy Group’s Izzo. “The first building being delivered as a true P3 is the Long Beach courthouse in California, which will top out this summer.”

Others are bringing on experts to find the money. Graef hired an economic development specialist, Ronald Van Straten, who has more than 25 years’ experience in helping mostly municipal clients seek grants, low-cost loans, and other funding streams for their capital projects, including tax increment financing.

HEAVY CONCENTRATION AT THE TOP 10 FIRMS

As is true of most of the categories in our Giants 300 rankings, there is a great deal of concentration at the highest level in the E and EA markets. The top 10 engineering firms generated 47% of total revenue for the category, while the top 10 engineering/architecture Giants generated a hefty 85% of the dollars in their group. +

ENGINEERING FIRMS

Rank Company 2011 Total Revenue ($)
1 Fluor Corp. 220,674,900
2 Arup 140,324,134
3 WSP USA 98,900,000
4 Syska Hennessy Group 98,744,701
5 Affiliated Engineers 92,815,000
6 KPFF Consulting Engineers 89,000,000
7 Henderson Engineers 61,266,000
8 AKF Group 58,100,000
9 TTG/TMAD Taylor & Gaines 56,820,300
10 Smith Seckman Reid 53,497,000
11 R.G. Vanderweil Engineers 49,823,500
12 KJWW Engineering Consultants 43,784,892
13 Bard, Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers 40,100,000
14 Coffman Engineers 37,200,000
15 TLC Engineering for Architecture 36,387,033
16 Degenkolb Engineers 35,398,917
17 Sebesta Blomberg 35,120,000
18 ESD/Environmental Systems Design 34,465,000
19 Rolf Jensen & Associates 34,300,000
20 Walter P Moore 34,231,775
21 RMF Engineering 34,005,000
22 Glumac 33,010,927
23 Magnusson Klemencic Associates 32,306,973
24 RDK Engineers 30,882,000
25 Mazzetti Nash Lipsey Burch 28,836,967
26 Aon Fire Protection Engineering 28,200,000
27 Birdsall Services Group 27,500,000
28 Interface Engineering 25,938,485
29 M/E Engineering 25,915,000
30 ccrd partners 24,100,000
31 H.F. Lenz Co. 22,799,000
32 Heapy Engineering 21,402,816
33 Sparling 20,589,847
34 ThermalTech Engineering 19,890,000
35 KCI Technologies 19,761,000
36 Newcomb & Boyd 18,454,021
37 Henneman Engineering 18,000,000
38 Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Eng. 17,650,492
39 GHT Limited 17,363,705
40 Eaton Energy Solutions 16,694,769
41 Rutherford & Chekene 16,538,000
42 Dunham Associates 15,500,000
43 Joseph R. Loring & Associates 15,000,000
44 Wallace Engineering 13,780,000
45 James Posey Associates 13,500,000
46 KLH Engineers 12,559,382
47 Lilker Associates Consulting Engineers 12,500,000
48 Karpinski Engineering 12,343,996
49 P2S Engineering 11,896,229
50 RMH Group, The 11,864,683
51 Peter Basso Associates 10,400,000
52 Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering 10,039,000
53 French & Parrello Associates 9,782,762
54 Bala Consulting Engineers 9,360,000
55 Allen & Shariff 8,610,036
56 Wick Fisher White 7,821,928
57 Brinjac Engineering 7,342,166
58 CTLGroup 6,030,000
59 O’Dea, Lynch, Abbattista Consulting Engineers 5,900,000
60 FBA Engineering 4,000,000
61 Kamm Consulting 3,681,775
62 Apogee Consulting Group 2,485,000
63 G&W Engineering 2,058,000

 

ENGINEERING/ARCHITECTURE FIRMS

Rank Company 2011 Total Revenue ($)
1 Jacobs 2,699,100,000
2 AECOM Technology Corp. 1,487,000,000
3 M+W U.S. 1,015,199,252
4 Stantec  463,300,000
5 Parsons Brinckerhoff 311,300,000
6 URS Corp. 294,100,000
7 exp 205,000,000
8 Science Applications International Corp. 185,390,000
9 Merrick & Co. 111,000,000
10 Day & Zimmermann 109,909,604
11 SSOE Group 107,819,740
12 STV 104,876,000
13 Thornton Tomasetti 98,017,214
14 Burns & McDonnell 94,711,826
15 Dewberry 89,282,766
16 Michael Baker Jr., Inc. 80,730,000
17 Middough 75,750,000
18 Clark Nexsen 68,424,208
19 Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates 64,080,000
20 Simpson Gumpertz & Heger 59,170,000
21 AKF Group 58,100,000
22 H&A Architects & Engineers 39,064,020
23 Walker Parking Consultants 34,422,898
24 BRPH 31,500,000
25 Bergmann Associates 30,700,000
26 Shive-Hattery 28,192,943
27 Atkins North America 23,620,537
28 Ross & Baruzzini 20,377,769
29 Barge Waggoner Sumner & Cannon 20,100,000
30 Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor 18,300,000
31 Guernsey 18,293,701
32 L.R. Kimball 17,759,000
33 GRAEF-USA 16,770,180
34 Zak Companies 12,335,494
35 CJL Engineering 12,228,000
36 Stanley Consultants 10,892,000
37 Spectrum Engineers 8,828,890
38 GRW 6,290,216
39 Davis, Bowen & Friedel 4,680,714
40 Vintage Archonics 1,972,220

Related Stories

Reconstruction & Renovation | Mar 28, 2022

Is your firm a reconstruction sector giant?

Is your firm active in the U.S. building reconstruction, renovation, historic preservation, and adaptive reuse markets? We invite you to participate in BD+C's inaugural Reconstruction Market Research Report.

Legislation | Mar 28, 2022

LEED Platinum office tower faces millions in fines due to New York’s Local Law 97

One Bryant Park, also known as the Bank of America Tower, in Manhattan faces an estimated $2.4 million in annual fines when New York City’s York’s Local Law 97 goes into effect.

Healthcare Facilities | Mar 25, 2022

Health group converts bank building to drive-thru clinic

Edward-Elmhurst Health and JTS Architects had to get creative when turning an American Chartered Bank into a drive-thru clinic for outpatient testing and vaccinations.

Higher Education | Mar 24, 2022

Higher education sector sees 19 percent reduction in facilities investments

Colleges and universities face a growing backlog of capital needs and funding shortfalls, according to Gordian’s 2022 State of Facilities in Higher Education report. 

Architects | Mar 16, 2022

James Hoban: Designer and builder of the White House

Stewart D. McLaurin, President of the White House Historical Association, chats with BD+C Executive Editor Robert Cassidy about James Hoban, the Irish draftsman and builder who convinced George Washington to let him design and build the White House.    

Architects | Mar 16, 2022

Diébédo Francis Kéré named 2022 Pritzker Architecture Prize recipient

Diébédo Francis Kéré, architect, educator and social activist, has been selected as the 2022 Laureate of the Pritzker Architecture Prize, announced Tom Pritzker, Chairman of The Hyatt Foundation, which sponsors the award that is regarded internationally as architecture’s highest honor.

Architects | Mar 10, 2022

Gyo Obata, FAIA, HOK Founding Partner, passes away at 99

Obata's career spanned six decades and included iconic projects like the National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C., and Community of Christ Temple in Independence, Mo. 

AEC Tech Innovation | Mar 9, 2022

Meet Emerge: WSP USA's new AEC tech incubator

Pooja Jain, WSP’s VP-Strategic Innovation, discusses the pilot programs her firm’s new incubator, Emerge, has initiated with four tech startup companies. Jain speaks with BD+C's John Caulfield about the four AEC tech firms to join Cohort 1 of the firm’s incubator.

Architects | Mar 2, 2022

FGM Architects and LeMay Erickson Willcox Architects join forces

FGM Architects announced that LeMay Erickson Wilcox Architects, a 19-person architectural studio based in Reston, VA is joining their firm.   

Architects | Mar 1, 2022

Alyson Steele Elected President and CEO of Quinn Evans

(2.25.22) Alyson Steele, FAIA, LEED AP, has been elected president and chief executive officer of Quinn Evans, a nationally recognized firm providing architecture, planning, interior design, landscape architecture, and historic preservation services. Steele has been with the firm since 1997 and previously served as executive vice president and chief design officer. She succeeds Larry Barr, FAIA, who will continue to serve on the board of directors.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021