Solutions to increase the supply of affordable rental housing are explored in a new report from the Urban Land Institute’s (ULI) Terwilliger Center for Housing and Enterprise Community Partners, Inc (Enterprise).
Bending the Cost Curve: Solutions to Expand the Supply of Affordable Rentals outlines factors that impede the development of affordable rental housing – causing the supply in many markets to fall far short of the demand – and offers specific, actionable solutions to overcome the barriers.
Nationally, there were only 6.9 million rentals affordable to 11.8 million extremely low-income renters in 2011, a supply gap that grew by three million renters between 2001 and 2011—and continues to grow. "In an era of growing demand and declining government financial support for affordable rental housing, it is more important than ever to deliver affordable housing as effectively as possible,” the report says. “Bending the cost curve will enable developers to deliver additional affordable rental homes and help jurisdictions provide more housing choices, meet the growing need for affordable rentals, and ensure that individuals and families across a range of incomes have a place to call home within the community.”
The report, released today in Washington, D.C. at the ULI/Carolyn and Preston Butcher Forum on Multifamily Housing, is based on a series of interviews and roundtable discussions co-hosted by the Terwilliger Center and Enterprise over the past 16 months with nearly 200 developers, financiers, and policy makers in ten markets – Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles, New York City, San Francisco, Boston, Houston, Minneapolis, Pittsburgh, and Seattle.
Conclusions drawn from the discussions formed the basis for the research, which is intended to help fill the void of material examining how to overcome regulatory barriers to affordable rental development, such as land use, zoning and building code restrictions, processing delays, and financing obstacles. While economic conditions and demographics vary widely among different markets and play a significant role in local affordable housing development, the report identifies several overarching cost drivers, including:
- Project scale–Fixed costs such as land, legal expenses, and funding application fees, are not correlated to the number of units and often make smaller projects less economical on a per unit basis.
- Project design and construction – Community concerns, site selection, the price of construction labor, and state and local regulations affect the ability to produce high quality units at an affordable cost.
- Financing and underwriting – Because affordable rentals produce a lower level of profit, developers face several financing obstacles, such as difficulty attracting investors who are strictly yield driven; complicated deals requiring multiple layers of funding; and limited or no availability of financing for smaller projects and for mixed income projects.
- Complex deal structures – Project fees, timing of tax credit use, higher risk, greater due diligence, longer timelines, and the need to set aside capital reserves all drive up costs.
“Drivers of cost come at all points in the development process and are deeply intertwined, but the need for more affordable rentals compels us to take on the challenge of understanding the drivers and work to mitigate them,” said Lynn Ross, executive director of the Terwilliger Center.
“Enterprise and ULI will use the joint research to spark federal, state and local conversations that lead to policy change and financial innovation, ultimately stretching limited resources for affordable housing,” said Ali Solis, senior vice president of public policy and external affairs at Enterprise. “At the same time, we must maintain high quality, green standards so that affordable homes can be sustainable for the long haul. That is our challenge as an industry.”
To address the cost drivers, the report offers several recommendations:
- Promote cost-effectiveness through consolidation, coordination, and simplification.This includes consolidating monitoring and due diligence activities; coordinating competitive funding competitions; improving codes, zoning and regulation; and streamlining HUD financing.
- Remove barriers to reducing construction costs and delays. This includes implementing smart parking requirements; reviewing unit size and amenity requirements; reforming codes and other rules that make rehabilitation difficult; finding ways to better coordinate development teams; and supporting innovative building techniques like micro-units and prefabricated housing.
- Facilitate a more efficient deal assembly and development timeline. This includes eliminating zoning barriers to by-right housing development; creating clarity and structure in the public engagement process; adopting state and local policies to streamline local development; promoting consistency in state Qualified Allocation Plans (QAPs); and adopting efficient deadlines for deal assembly and project development.
- Improve and align incentives. This includes evaluating life-cycle cost considerations in the underwriting process; creating incentives for green building and energy-efficient design; incorporating cost considerations in the QAP process; assessing the time frame in which costs are evaluated for the purpose of underwriting; providing local incentives for affordable housing development (such as land acquisition subsidies, property tax abatements, fee waivers and expedited permitting); and removing perverse incentives that can increase costs (potentially by adopting alternate compensation models or flexible tax credit allocations).
- Improve the flexibility of existing sources of financing and create new financial products to better meet needs. This includes exploring entity-level financial products; facilitating the acquisition of existing multifamily properties through direct subsidies, public-private partnerships or regulatory flexibility; facilitating more efficient use of project reserves; and providing greater flexibility in 4-percent Low-Income Housing Tax Credit allocations (such as alternate sources of debt financing, private placement of bonds or direct bond purchases).
- Support the development and dissemination of information and best practices. This includes creating a cost competition to support innovative practice; determining appropriate units of measurement and comparison to guide decision making (such as costs-per-unit or costs-per-person); building a community of practice; and creating a forum for sharing data and best practices.
In addition to the recommendations, the report identifies three lessons drawn from the research – 1) Cost drivers come at all points in the development process and are deeply intertwined; 2) Mitigating the cost drivers requires collaboration efforts involving multiple stakeholders from the private and public sector; and 3) Leadership is essential to implement the recommendations.
About the Urban Land Institute
The Urban Land Institute www.uli.org is a nonprofit education and research institute supported by its members. Its mission is to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in creating and sustaining thriving communities worldwide. Established in 1936, the institute has more than 30,000 members worldwide representing all aspects of land use and development disciplines.
About the ULI Terwilliger Center for Housing
The ULI Terwilliger Center for Housing engages in a multifaceted program of work that furthers the development of mixed-income, mixed-use communities with a full spectrum of housing affordability. The center was established in 2007 by J. Ronald Terwilliger, former ULI chairman and chairman emeritus of Trammell Crow Residential.
About Enterprise Community Partners
Enterprise Community Partners works with partners nationwide to build opportunity. Enterprise creates and advocates for affordable homes in thriving communities linked to jobs, good schools, health care services, and transportation. Enterprise lends funds, finance development, and manage and build affordable housing while shaping new strategies, solutions, and policy. Over more than 30 years, Enterprise has created 300,000 homes, invested nearly $14 billion, and touched millions of lives. Join us at www.EnterpriseCommunity.com or www.EnterpriseCommunity.org.
Related Stories
| Feb 14, 2011
Sustainable Roofing: A Whole-Building Approach
According to sustainability experts, the first step toward designing an energy-efficient roofing system is to see roof materials and systems as an integral component of the enclosure and the building as a whole. Earn 1.0 AIA/CES learning units by studying this article and successfully completing the online exam.
| Feb 11, 2011
Four Products That Stand Up to Hurricanes
What do a panelized wall system, a newly developed roof hatch, spray polyurethane foam, and a custom-made curtain wall have in common? They’ve been extensively researched and tested for their ability to take abuse from the likes of Hurricane Katrina.
| Feb 11, 2011
RS Means Cost Comparison Chart: Office Buildings
This month's RS Means Cost Comparison Chart focuses on office building construction.
| Feb 11, 2011
Sustainable features on the bill for dual-building performing arts center at Soka University of America
The $73 million Soka University of America’s new performing arts center and academic complex recently opened on the school’s Aliso Viejo, Calif., campus. McCarthy Building Companies and Zimmer Gunsul Frasca Architects collaborated on the two-building project. One is a three-story, 47,836-sf facility with a grand reception lobby, a 1,200-seat auditorium, and supports spaces. The other is a four-story, 48,974-sf facility with 11 classrooms, 29 faculty offices, a 150-seat black box theater, rehearsal/dance studio, and support spaces. The project, which has a green roof, solar panels, operable windows, and sun-shading devices, is going for LEED Silver.
| Feb 11, 2011
BIM-enabled Texas church complex can broadcast services in high-def
After two years of design and construction, members of the Gateway Church in Southland, Texas, were able to attend services in their new 4,000-seat facility in late 2010. Located on a 180-acre site, the 205,000-sf complex has six auditoriums, including a massive 200,000-sf Worship Center, complete with catwalks, top-end audio and video system, and high-definition broadcast capabilities. BIM played a significant role in the building’s design and construction. Balfour Beatty Construction and Beck Architecture formed the nucleus of the Building Team.
| Feb 11, 2011
Kentucky’s first green adaptive reuse project earns Platinum
(FER) studio, Inglewood, Calif., converted a 115-year-old former dry goods store in Louisville, Ky., into a 10,175-sf mixed-use commercial building earned LEED Platinum and holds the distinction of being the state’s first adaptive reuse project to earn any LEED rating. The facility, located in the East Market District, houses a gallery, event space, offices, conference space, and a restaurant. Sustainable elements that helped the building reach its top LEED rating include xeriscaping, a green roof, rainwater collection and reuse, 12 geothermal wells, 81 solar panels, a 1,100-gallon ice storage system (off-grid energy efficiency is 68%) and the reuse and recycling of construction materials. Local firm Peters Construction served as GC.
| Feb 11, 2011
Former Richardson Romanesque hotel now houses books, not beds
The Piqua (Ohio) Public Library was once a late 19th-century hotel that sat vacant and deteriorating for years before a $12.3 million adaptive reuse project revitalized the 1891 building. The design team of PSA-Dewberry, MKC Associates, and historic preservation specialist Jeff Wray Associates collaborated on the restoration of the 80,000-sf Richardson Romanesque building, once known as the Fort Piqua Hotel. The team restored a mezzanine above the lobby and repaired historic windows, skylight, massive fireplace, and other historic details. The basement, with its low ceiling and stacked stone walls, was turned into a castle-like children’s center. The Piqua Historical Museum is also located within the building.
| Feb 11, 2011
Justice center on Fall River harbor serves up daylight, sustainable elements, including eucalyptus millwork
Located on historic South Main Street in Fall River, Mass., the Fall River Justice Center opened last fall to serve as the city’s Superior and District Courts building. The $85 million facility was designed by Boston-based Finegold Alexander + Associates Inc., with Dimeo Construction as CM and Arup as MEP. The 154,000-sf courthouse contains nine courtrooms, a law library, and a detention area. Most of the floors have the same ceiling height, which will makes them easier to reconfigure in the future as space needs change. Designed to achieve LEED Silver, the facility’s elliptical design offers abundant natural daylight and views of the harbor. Renewable eucalyptus millwork is one of the sustainable features.
| Feb 11, 2011
Research facility separates but also connects lab spaces
California State University, Northridge, consolidated its graduate and undergraduate biology and mathematics programs into one 90,000-sf research facility. Architect of record Cannon Design worked on the new Chaparral Hall, creating a four-story facility with two distinct spaces that separate research and teaching areas; these are linked by faculty offices to create collaborative spaces. The building houses wet research, teaching, and computational research labs, a 5,000-sf vivarium, classrooms, and administrative offices. A four-story outdoor lobby and plaza and an outdoor staircase provide orientation. A covered walkway links the new facility with the existing science complex. Saiful/Bouquet served as structural engineer, Bard, Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers served as MEP, and Research Facilities Design was laboratory consultant.
