flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Two myths regarding NFPA 101 Life Safety Code debunked

Codes and Standards

Two myths regarding NFPA 101 Life Safety Code debunked

NFPA life safety engineer Ron Coté settles the debate over second egress doors and exit signs.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | June 18, 2015
Two myths regarding NFPA 101 Life Safety Code debunked

Image: Pixabay

In Compliance column in the May/June issue of NFPA Journal, Ron Coté, Principal Life Safety Engineer at the National Fire Protection Agency, debunks two myths regarding NFPA 101, Life Safety Code.

The first myth is that all assembly occupancy rooms with an occupancy load more than 50 must have a second egress door. This is not true, although many do have second exit access doors “in order not to violate the common path of travel limitation,” Coté writes.

For most room locations and arrangements, a second exit access door from the room can be positioned to provide occupants with a second travel path. The presence of the second exit access door can reduce what would otherwise be an excessive common path of travel to one that is within the permitted distance.

Coté also debunks the myth that exit signs are required at exits only. The signs are actually required in three locations: at exits, in the exit access, and in exit access corridors of new construction. They are required in the exit access when the exit or way to reach the exit is not readily apparent, as might be the case where additional turns in the egress path are needed to reach an exit.

They may also be needed when in exit access corridors of new construction no point is in excess of the particular sign’s rated viewing distance or the 100-foot (30-meter) default value, whichever is less, from the nearest sign.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | May 6, 2020

A few ways contractors can manage COVID-19 risks

Staggered start times, rigorous tool cleaning, virtual training among the strategies.

Codes and Standards | May 5, 2020

NAHB loses influence in 2021 IECC building code development

Despite objections from the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), the development of the 2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) is nearing conclusion. NAHB objected to several more stringent energy efficiency provisions.

Codes and Standards | May 5, 2020

2020 IECC will lead to significant carbon emissions reductions

New model building code nearly finalized.

Codes and Standards | May 4, 2020

New York expands prevailing wage law

Now includes private projects with 30% or more of public subsidies.

Codes and Standards | May 1, 2020

OSHA says most employers don’t have to track worker COVID-19 infections

Agency clarifies responsibility for contractors, others.

Codes and Standards | Apr 29, 2020

New York City tightens restrictions on construction during pandemic

Dept. of Buildings has issued more than 100 violations and stop-work orders.

Codes and Standards | Apr 28, 2020

ASHRAE, WELL panels to tackle revising standards to limit spread of viruses in buildings

Will examine ways to reduce infectious threats through building designs and operations.

Codes and Standards | Apr 24, 2020

Dept. of Labor issues guidance for respiratory protection during N95 shortage

Elastomeric respirators or powered, air-purifying respirators, and expired N95s are allowable alternatives

Codes and Standards | Apr 23, 2020

Group will create ecosystem for smart building data

Seven Finnish companies aim to integrate all technical systems into a single platform.

Codes and Standards | Apr 23, 2020

COVID-19 epidemic demonstrates value of flexible hospital space

Some rooms being repurposed for ICU care.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021