flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Two myths regarding NFPA 101 Life Safety Code debunked

Codes and Standards

Two myths regarding NFPA 101 Life Safety Code debunked

NFPA life safety engineer Ron Coté settles the debate over second egress doors and exit signs.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | June 18, 2015
Two myths regarding NFPA 101 Life Safety Code debunked

Image: Pixabay

In Compliance column in the May/June issue of NFPA Journal, Ron Coté, Principal Life Safety Engineer at the National Fire Protection Agency, debunks two myths regarding NFPA 101, Life Safety Code.

The first myth is that all assembly occupancy rooms with an occupancy load more than 50 must have a second egress door. This is not true, although many do have second exit access doors “in order not to violate the common path of travel limitation,” Coté writes.

For most room locations and arrangements, a second exit access door from the room can be positioned to provide occupants with a second travel path. The presence of the second exit access door can reduce what would otherwise be an excessive common path of travel to one that is within the permitted distance.

Coté also debunks the myth that exit signs are required at exits only. The signs are actually required in three locations: at exits, in the exit access, and in exit access corridors of new construction. They are required in the exit access when the exit or way to reach the exit is not readily apparent, as might be the case where additional turns in the egress path are needed to reach an exit.

They may also be needed when in exit access corridors of new construction no point is in excess of the particular sign’s rated viewing distance or the 100-foot (30-meter) default value, whichever is less, from the nearest sign.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jan 25, 2019

AEC professionals should push for net zero projects

Educate and lead clients to more sustainable choices, says LEED fellow.

Codes and Standards | Jan 24, 2019

OSHA unaffected by federal government shutdown

Agency fully funded for first nine months of 2019.

Codes and Standards | Jan 23, 2019

Hackers can easily take control of construction cranes

Potential for serious harm is real, say researchers.

Codes and Standards | Jan 22, 2019

Initiative will introduce open-source software for commercial and public building retrofits

Energy analysis tool will identify energy efficiency opportunities.

Codes and Standards | Jan 18, 2019

Texas city sues developer over changes in $1 billion mixed-use project

Revised plan eliminated 8-acre lagoon, trolley, show fountain, and reduced retail space.

Codes and Standards | Jan 17, 2019

First resilience benchmarks for U.S. communities released

Provides way to evaluate current state of resilience and guidance for areas of improvement.

Codes and Standards | Jan 16, 2019

California mass timber building competition kicks off January 15

Competition will award $500,000 in grants to teams who design innovative buildings.

Codes and Standards | Jan 15, 2019

Hazard mitigation provisions in codes save lives and protect property

New NIBS study finds that adopting 2018 Intl. Codes generate $11 benefit for every $1 invested.

Codes and Standards | Jan 10, 2019

Ontario building first to achieve zero-carbon designation by Canada GBC

Geothermal heating, living wall among notable features.

Codes and Standards | Jan 9, 2019

Policymakers need to act to alleviate affordable housing crunch

Moody’s economist says costs including mortgage rates worsening situation.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021