flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Traditional lab design doesn't address neurodiverse needs, study finds

Laboratories

Traditional lab design doesn't address neurodiverse needs, study finds

Nearly 50% of survey respondents who work in laboratory settings identified as neurodivergent. Without inclusive laboratory designs, the scientific research profession risks reduced productivity, burnout, and recruitment and retention challenges.


By HOK | September 27, 2024
Serious concentrated female microbiologist in sterile clothing and safety goggles sitting at table and dropping reagent in petri dish while doing research in laboratory
Photo courtesy Adobe Stock

A groundbreaking study conducted by ARC – Advanced Research Clusters, HOK, and the University of the West of Scotland (UWS), has revealed that half (48.1%) of all survey respondents who work in laboratory settings identify as neurodivergent, more than double the global average (20%) and more than a quarter (25.5%) identify as autistic, twenty-five times the UK average (1%). Because of this, spaces designed to foster technological and scientific innovation are inadvertently stifling the potential of the brilliant minds working within them by not addressing the sensory processing needs of the occupants.

To date, there has been a dearth of research into creating inclusive scientific spaces. Focused on science and technology innovators in laboratory settings, this study aimed to identify how individuals respond to sensory stimulation in current lab designs. It revealed how neurodivergent individuals are particularly sensitive to auditory, visual and tactile elements, exposing that many existing laboratories are not designed to address these needs holistically. These sensory distractions are linked to cognitive interruptions such as loss of focus and a disruption of creativity and innovation, which directly impacts employee engagement, satisfaction, and productivity.

The study also revealed that a third (29.9%) of the next generation of innovators consider themselves neurotypical. Without inclusive laboratory designs, the scientific research profession risks undermining these brilliant minds, leading to reduced productivity, poor recall, burnout, stress and recruitment and retention challenges.

Results for Designing Neuroinclusive Laboratory Environments

Dr. Edward Edgerton from UWS said: “Often, neurodivergent employees will manage their work environments by hiding signs of their neurodiversity. However, even when their neurodiversity is recognized, their workplaces can still be exhausting, impacting negatively on their performance and wellbeing. Few organizations have considered neurodiversity workspace design particularly for laboratories.”

ARC supports over 300 science and tech organizations and over 10,000 innovators. The anonymised study included lab-based users from ARC’s network, including the renowned Harwell Science Campus, science departments at the University of Oxford and participants from selected European science campuses.

HOK, a leading global architecture firm that specializes in designing neuroinclusive spaces, partnered with ARC and UWS for the research. The team explored ways to identify sensory preferences and challenges and to develop design principles critical to the performance, sense of belonging and overall satisfaction of the people using laboratory spaces. Studies have shown that spaces that support diverse thinking enhance creativity and innovation by 20 percent.

Kay Sargent, HOK’s director of thought leadership, interiors, said: “You don’t have to be neurodivergent to be annoyed by sound, temperature, or light. But what might be annoying for someone who is neurotypical might be debilitating to someone with ADHD, autism, or other neurodivergence. It’s about making spaces more functional for 100% of the people. By creating neuro-flexible spaces, we’re enabling some of the world’s brightest minds to come together, allowing super-creative people to find their own personal, comfortable space.”

Design Strategies for Neurodiverse Laboratories

Design strategies identified by HOK that should be implemented in future laboratory developments include: providing individuals with choices, the right level of sound and auditory controls to support specific tasks, creating spaces with access to natural daylight and biophilic elements, reducing visual clutter, having adjustable ergonomic furniture, incorporating areas within the lab to retreat or reset, and introducing collaborative areas and spaces for doodling.

Jenny Gardner, ARC’s development director said: “At ARC, we understand the importance of creating spaces that support our members in solving the world’s greatest challenges. Until now the industry has failed to address the needs and experiences of neurodiverse individuals, prioritizing sterile, modern looks and open-plan co-working spaces without areas to decompress. We’re committed to changing this by designing inclusive scientific spaces that enable our members to deliver life-changing science.”

Daisy Shearer, a Quantum physicist and neurodiversity advocate, said: "Ensuring scientific workspaces are designed with neuro-inclusion in mind is an often-overlooked aspect to accessibility and the EDI conversation. It's great to see these discussions happening around neurodiversity at ARC, so we can create inclusive spaces where all neurotypes can thrive. Good research and innovation stems from those who work on it, ensuring a diverse group of people can access these careers is key."

Download the full report here.

Related Stories

Higher Education | Oct 24, 2022

Wellesley College science complex modernizes facility while preserving architectural heritage

A recently completed expansion and renovation of Wellesley College’s science complex yielded a modernized structure for 21st century STEM education while preserving important historical features.

Laboratories | Oct 5, 2022

Bigger is better for a maturing life sciences sector

CRB's latest report predicts more diversification and vertical integration in research and production.

Laboratories | Sep 12, 2022

Lab space scarcity propels construction demand in life sciences sector

In its 2021 Life Sciences Real Estate Outlook, JLL predicted that access to talent would be a primary concern for an industry sector that had been growing by leaps and bounds. A year later, talent still guides real estate decisions. But market conditions of a different sort were cooling the biotech field: namely, investors that have soured on startups which underperformed after going public. What this means for new construction and renovation going forward is unpredictable, as the drivers behind life sciences’ surge are still palpable.

| Sep 2, 2022

New UMass Medical School building enables expanded medical class sizes, research labs

  A new nine-story, 350,000 sf biomedical research and education facility under construction at the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School in Worcester, Mass., will accommodate larger class sizes and extensive lab space.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 70 Science + Technology Facility Contractors + CM Firms 2022

Whiting-Turner, Hensel Phelps, DPR Construction, and Skanska USA top the rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facility contractors and construction management (CM) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 70 Science + Technology Facility Engineering + EA Firms 2022

Jacobs, CRB, Fluor, and Affiliated Engineers Inc. head the rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facility engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 100 Science + Technology Facility Architecture + AE Firms 2022

HDR, Flad Architects, Gensler, and DGA top the rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facility architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 45 Laboratory Facility Contractors and Construction Management Firms for 2022

Whiting-Turner, Hensel Phelps, McCarthy, and STO Building Group top the ranking of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) laboratory facility contractors and construction management (CM) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 55 Laboratory Facility Engineering + EA Firms for 2022

Jacobs, Affiliated Engineers Inc., Burns & McDonnell, and WSP top the ranking of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) laboratory facility engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 85 Laboratory Facility Architecture + AE Firms for 2022

Flad Architects, HDR, DGA, and Payette top the ranking of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) laboratory facility architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




Great Solutions

41 Great Solutions for architects, engineers, and contractors

AI ChatBots, ambient computing, floating MRIs, low-carbon cement, sunshine on demand, next-generation top-down construction. These and 35 other innovations make up our 2024 Great Solutions Report, which highlights fresh ideas and innovations from leading architecture, engineering, and construction firms.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021