Top University Sector Architecture Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

Rank	Company	2012 University Revenue ($)
1	Cannon Design	$71,000,000
2	Perkins+Will	$49,726,543
3	Stantec	$36,704,077
4	EYP	$30,000,000
5	SmithGroupJJR	$25,600,000
6	Gensler	$22,140,000
7	IBI Group	$21,432,712
8	Flad Architects	$20,350,000
9	Wight & Co.	$18,072,200
10	Sasaki Associates	$16,865,404
11	S/L/A/M Collaborative, The	$16,732,000
12	Shepley Bulfinch Richardson & Abbott	$16,723,428
13	Skidmore, Owings & Merrill	$16,581,000
14	ZGF Architects	$16,323,223
15	Lord, Aeck & Sargent	$15,680,000
16	Davis Brody Bond	$14,201,075
17	Ennead Architects	$13,880,000
18	HMC Architects	$13,132,956
19	DLR Group	$12,550,000
20	HKS	$12,200,000
21	Ballinger	$12,147,660
22	Moseley Architects	$11,868,162
23	SHW Group	$11,759,862
24	Perkins Eastman	$11,600,000
25	NBBJ	$11,358,000
26	LPA	$10,664,724
27	Heery International	$10,437,000
28	Harley Ellis Devereaux	$10,274,000
29	FXFOWLE Architects	$9,360,417
30	LMN Architects	$9,269,800
31	Morris Architects	$8,950,000
32	Cooper Carry	$8,720,837
33	CO Architects	$8,155,000
34	Hammel, Green and Abrahamson	$7,935,000
35	Mithun	$7,070,000
36	Solomon Cordwell Buenz	$7,000,000
37	HNTB Archtecture	$6,871,989
38	BSA LifeStructures	$6,015,376
39	Legat Architects	$5,982,000
40	Leo A Daly	$5,824,708
41	Little	$5,304,400
42	WHR Architects	$5,225,257
43	PGAL	$5,200,000
44	OZ Architecture	$5,198,430
45	HOK	$5,182,000
46	Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber	$5,000,000
47	Niles Bolton Associates	$4,915,906
48	Goodwyn, Mills & Cawood	$4,900,000
49	PageSoutherlandPage	$4,750,000
50	Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates	$4,722,700
51	EwingCole	$4,700,000
52	FGM Architects	$4,435,585
53	RSP Architects	$4,253,000
54	SRG Partnership	$4,112,896
55	NTD Architecture	$4,071,573
56	Moody Nolan	$4,000,000
57	Kirksey Architecture	$3,807,454
58	LS3P	$3,613,028
59	Cambridge Seven Associates	$3,600,000
60	Westlake Reed Leskosky	$3,500,000
61	WDG Architecture	$3,322,000
62	VOA Associates	$2,967,080
63	Ashley McGraw Architects	$2,879,022
64	CTA Architects Engineers	$2,839,414
65	NAC\|Architecture	$2,762,590
66	Beyer Blinder Belle Architects & Planners	$2,684,165
67	Fletcher-Thompson	$2,650,000
68	Carrier Johnson + Culture	$2,445,427
69	SLATERPAULL Architects	$2,427,061
70	Architekton	$2,189,543
71	Reynolds, Smith and Hills	$2,180,000
72	HLW International	$2,000,000
73	Wight	$1,950,569
74	H+L Architecture	$1,850,000
75	Astorino	$1,744,000
76	RNL	$1,729,000
77	Environetics	$1,725,207
78	Harvard Jolly Architecture	$1,652,472
79	Baskervill	$1,588,000
80	PBK	$1,500,000
81	Cuningham Group Architecture	$1,431,409
82	Hoffmann Architects	$1,384,000
83	Good Fulton & Farrell	$1,206,601
84	RTKL Associates	$1,158,000
85	Lee, Burkhart, Liu	$1,025,000
86	BLT Architects	$950,000
87	Fanning/Howey Associates	$833,000
88	Goettsch Partners	$820,000
89	SMMA \| Symmes Maini & McKee Associates	$810,000
90	BBS Architects, Landscape Architects and Engineers	$800,000
91	H3 Hardy Collaboration Architecture	$796,000
92	KZF Design	$728,262
93	Sherlock, Smith & Adams	$713,000
94	GBBN Architects	$710,000
95	Francis Cauffman	$655,273
96	Gresham, Smith and Partners	$625,969
97	DesignGroup	$458,123
98	Ware Malcomb	$344,000
99	TEG Architects - The Estopinal Group	$341,013
100	Corgan	$294,384
101	Albert Kahn Family of Companies	$258,798
102	FRCH Design Worldwide	$250,000
103	Hnedak Bobo Group	$239,000
104	DLA Architects	$233,380
105	JRS Architect	$200,000
106	Hensley Lamkin Rachel	$171,000
107	Fentress Architects	$168,589
108	MBH Architects	$163,000
109	Epstein	$118,600
110	Emersion Design	$104,669
111	Smallwood, Reynolds, Stewart, Stewart & Associates	$103,818

Back to the University Sector Giants article

Read BD+C's full Giants 300 Report

In its 2021 Life Sciences Real Estate Outlook, JLL predicted that access to talent would be a primary concern for an industry sector that had been growing by leaps and bounds. A year later, talent still guides real estate decisions. But market conditions of a different sort were cooling the biotech field: namely, investors that have soured on startups which underperformed after going public. What this means for new construction and renovation going forward is unpredictable, as the drivers behind life sciences’ surge are still palpable.