Rank | Company | 2013 Healthcare Revenue |
1 | AECOM Technology Corp. | 180,760,000 |
2 | Jacobs | 87,770,000 |
3 | URS Corp. | 45,036,525 |
4 | Smith Seckman Reid | 40,105,600 |
5 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | 38,000,000 |
6 | Allen & Shariff | 36,000,000 |
7 | BR+A Consulting Engineers | 29,900,000 |
8 | Affiliated Engineers | 27,947,000 |
9 | CCRD Partners | 23,760,000 |
10 | Burns & McDonnell | 19,810,000 |
11 | Parsons Brinckerhoff | 17,950,364 |
12 | KJWW Engineering Consultants | 17,848,081 |
13 | Mazzetti | 16,963,459 |
14 | AKF Group | 16,432,000 |
15 | STV | 16,419,000 |
16 | TTG | 15,224,500 |
17 | Dewberry | 15,179,608 |
18 | Degenkolb Engineers | 12,635,148 |
19 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | 11,667,359 |
20 | Zak Companies | 11,620,500 |
21 | Syska Hennessy Group | 10,910,770 |
22 | Arup | 10,609,311 |
23 | Heapy Engineering | 10,211,094 |
24 | M-E Engineers | 9,657,000 |
25 | I. C. Thomasson Associates | 9,400,000 |
26 | Thornton Tomasetti | 7,774,388 |
27 | Shive-Hattery | 7,686,286 |
28 | RMF Engineering | 7,100,000 |
29 | Sparling | 6,566,306 |
30 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | 6,240,000 |
31 | RDK Engineers | 5,500,000 |
32 | Dunham Associates | 5,500,000 |
33 | Karpinski Engineering | 5,307,808 |
34 | M/E Engineering | 5,163,876 |
35 | SSOE Group | 5,111,297 |
36 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | 5,110,000 |
37 | Highland Associates | 4,900,000 |
38 | Vanderweil Engineers | 4,566,200 |
39 | KCI Technologies | 4,500,000 |
40 | Coffman Engineers | 4,202,872 |
41 | Environmental Systems Design | 4,142,911 |
42 | H.F. Lenz | 4,050,740 |
43 | Ross & Baruzzini | 3,980,169 |
44 | Interface Engineering | 3,888,841 |
45 | Newcomb & Boyd | 3,651,012 |
46 | Glumac | 3,605,075 |
47 | WSP Group | 3,490,000 |
48 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | 3,326,881 |
49 | CJL Engineering | 3,093,720 |
50 | Henderson Engineers | 3,042,727 |
51 | Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corp. | 3,000,000 |
52 | KLH Engineers | 2,168,871 |
53 | Graef | 2,092,951 |
54 | Apogee Consulting Group | 2,080,275 |
55 | Primera Engineers | 2,032,000 |
56 | Martin/Martin | 1,693,693 |
57 | DeSimone Consulting Engineers | 1,693,478 |
58 | Spectrum Engineers | 1,664,669 |
59 | Brinjac Engineering | 1,299,629 |
60 | Wick Fisher White | 1,027,071 |
61 | Wallace Engineering | 853,000 |
62 | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | 809,347 |
63 | Bala Consulting Engineers | 687,000 |
64 | Walter P Moore and Associates | 683,315 |
65 | Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber | 600,000 |
66 | Davis, Bowen & Friedel | 590,125 |
67 | P2S Engineering | 557,346 |
68 | OLA Consulting Engineers | 492,000 |
69 | Joseph R. Loring & Associates | 480,000 |
70 | CTLGroup | 410,000 |
71 | Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering | 400,000 |
72 | French & Parrello Associates | 385,000 |
73 | ThermalTech Engineering | 350,000 |
74 | G&W Engineering Corp. | 191,800 |
75 | Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor | 180,000 |
76 | Leidos | 170,000 |
77 | Stanley Consultants | 157,889 |
78 | Total Building Commissioning | 135,837 |
79 | GHT Limited | 100,000 |
80 | H&A Architects & Engineers | 75,000 |
81 | GRW | 53,200 |
82 | Kamm Consulting | 51,660 |
83 | Guernsey | 5,361 |
Read the Healthcare Giants article
Read BD+C's full 2014 Giants 300 Report
Related Stories
University Buildings | Jan 11, 2022
Designing for health sciences education: supporting student well-being
While student and faculty health and well-being should be a top priority in all spaces within educational facilities, this article will highlight some key considerations.
Green | Jan 10, 2022
The future of regenerative building is performance-based
Why measuring performance results is so critical, but also easier said than done.
Senior Living Design | Jan 5, 2022
Top Senior Living Facility Design and Construction Firms
Perkins Eastman, Kimley-Horn, WSP USA, Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., and Ryan Companies US top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest senior living sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2021 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Jan 3, 2022
2021 Government Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. government buildings sector
Stantec, Jacobs, Turner Construction, and Hensel Phelps top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest government sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2021 Giants 400 Report.
Architects | Dec 20, 2021
Digital nomads are influencing design
As our spaces continue to adapt to our future needs, we’ll likely see more collaborative, communal zones where people can relax, shop, and work.
Architects | Dec 17, 2021
What I wish I had learned in architecture school
Bradford Perkins, FAIA, offers a 3-point plan for upgrading architecture education.
Urban Planning | Dec 15, 2021
EV is the bridge to transit’s AV revolution—and now is the time to start building it
Thinking holistically about a technology-enabled customer experience will make transit a mode of choice for more people.
Sports and Recreational Facilities | Dec 15, 2021
Trends in sports stadium construction, with Turner Construction's Dewey Newton
Turner Construction's Dewey Newton discusses trends in sports stadium renovation and construction with BD+C's John Caulfield. Newton is a Senior Vice President who heads up Turner Construction’s Sports Group.
Healthcare Facilities | Dec 15, 2021
COVID-19 has altered the speed and design of healthcare projects, perhaps irrevocably
Healthcare clients want their projects up and running quicker, a task made more complicated by the shortage of skilled labor in many markets.
Healthcare Facilities | Dec 15, 2021
MEP design considerations for rural hospitals
Rural hospitals present unique opportunities and challenges for healthcare facility operators. Oftentimes, the infrastructure and building systems have not been updated for years and require significant improvements in order to meet today’s modern medical demands. Additionally, as these smaller, more remote hospitals are acquired by larger regional and national healthcare systems, the first step by new ownership is often to update and rehabilitate the building. But how can this be done thoughtfully, economically, and efficiently in ways that allow the engineering and facility staff to adapt to the changes? And how can the updates accurately reflect the specific needs of rural communities and the afflictions with which these areas most commonly face?