| Rank | Company | 2012 Healthcare Revenue ($) |
| 1 | AECOM Technology Corp. | $180,210,000 |
| 2 | Jacobs Engineering Group | $77,100,000 |
| 3 | URS Corp. | $43,327,332 |
| 4 | Smith Seckman Reid | $40,105,600 |
| 5 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | $30,000,000 |
| 6 | Affiliated Engineers | $28,217,000 |
| 7 | TTG | $24,719,905 |
| 8 | Parsons Brinckerhoff | $22,700,000 |
| 9 | Dewberry | $21,226,702 |
| 10 | Allen & Shariff | $20,300,000 |
| 11 | Bard, Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers | $19,000,000 |
| 12 | KJWW Engineering Consultants | $18,937,680 |
| 13 | Mazzetti | $18,293,579 |
| 14 | Degenkolb Engineers | $18,070,782 |
| 15 | CCRD Partners | $18,000,000 |
| 16 | Burns & McDonnell | $16,375,000 |
| 17 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $13,500,933 |
| 18 | Syska Hennessy Group | $11,495,282 |
| 19 | AKF Group | $10,770,000 |
| 20 | Arup | $9,244,250 |
| 21 | Shive-Hattery | $8,381,840 |
| 22 | Heapy Engineering | $8,159,633 |
| 23 | Zak Companies | $7,640,496 |
| 24 | M-E Engineers | $7,200,000 |
| 24 | RMF Engineering Design | $7,200,000 |
| 26 | Thornton Tomasetti | $6,858,953 |
| 27 | Sparling | $6,768,165 |
| 28 | Buro Happold Consulting Engineers | $6,520,000 |
| 29 | Rolf Jensen & Associates | $6,400,000 |
| 30 | Walter P Moore | $6,232,472 |
| 31 | Michael Baker Jr. | $6,200,000 |
| 32 | SSOE Group | $6,192,909 |
| 33 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | $5,700,000 |
| 34 | M/E Engineering | $5,671,750 |
| 35 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | $5,390,000 |
| 36 | Dunham Associates | $5,000,000 |
| 37 | Vanderweil Engineers | $4,846,600 |
| 38 | Interface Engineering | $4,633,068 |
| 39 | RDK Engineers | $4,572,000 |
| 40 | Karpinski Engineering | $4,438,224 |
| 41 | Clark Nexsen | $4,167,051 |
| 42 | Peter Basso Associates | $4,066,000 |
| 43 | Aon Fire Protection Engineering | $4,000,728 |
| 44 | H.F. Lenz | $3,983,000 |
| 45 | Newcomb & Boyd | $3,942,400 |
| 46 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $3,879,844 |
| 47 | STV | $3,735,000 |
| 48 | Walker Parking Consultants | $3,719,693 |
| 49 | Science Applications International Corp. | $3,621,708 |
| 50 | Eaton Energy Solutions | $3,502,239 |
| 51 | KCI Technologies | $3,500,000 |
| 52 | Coffman Engineers | $3,350,000 |
| 53 | Spectrum Engineers | $3,338,950 |
| 54 | Glumac | $3,296,000 |
| 55 | WSP USA | $2,411,684 |
| 56 | CJL Engineering | $2,390,686 |
| 57 | Environmental Systems Design | $2,383,822 |
| 58 | KLH Engineers | $2,100,000 |
| 59 | Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering | $2,000,000 |
| 60 | Apogee Consulting Group | $1,582,000 |
| 61 | Ross & Baruzzini | $1,505,511 |
| 62 | Henderson Engineers | $1,469,261 |
| 63 | Brinjac Engineering | $1,367,836 |
| 64 | GRAEF | $1,335,473 |
| 65 | ThermalTech Engineering | $1,300,000 |
| 66 | Haynes Whaley Associates | $1,226,927 |
| 67 | Bergmann Associates | $1,177,000 |
| 68 | Wick Fisher White | $1,137,773 |
| 69 | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | $1,053,699 |
| 70 | Bala Consulting Engineers | $850,000 |
| 71 | OLA Consulting Engineers | $750,000 |
| 72 | CTLGroup | $700,000 |
| 72 | French & Parrello Associates | $700,000 |
| 74 | Primera Engineers | $620,000 |
| 75 | FBA Engineering | $400,000 |
| 76 | Joseph R. Loring & Associates | $280,000 |
| 77 | G&W Engineering | $232,000 |
| 78 | Wallace Engineering | $225,000 |
| 79 | Stanley Consultants | $219,880 |
| 80 | Davis, Bowen & Friedel | $187,632 |
| 81 | Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor | $150,000 |
| 82 | P2S Engineering | $76,079 |
| 83 | Total Building Commissioning | $46,144 |
| 84 | Kamm Consulting | $21,025 |
| 85 | Guernsey | $11,668 |
Read the Healthcare Giants article
Read BD+C's full Giants 300 Report
Related Stories
Building Team Awards | May 26, 2016
Cimpress office complex built during historically brutal Massachusetts winter
Lean construction techniques were used to build 275 Wyman Street during a winter that brought more than 100 inches of snow to suburban Boston.
Building Team Awards | May 25, 2016
New health center campus provides affordable care for thousands of Northern Californians
The 38,000-sf, two-level John & Susan Sobrato Campus in Palo Alto is expected to serve 25,000 patients a year by the end of the decade.
Architects | May 24, 2016
Lissoni Architettura’s NYC Aquatrium takes first place in New York City Waterfront Design competition
NYC Aquatrium was selected from among 178 proposals from 40 countries as the winner of Arch Out Loud’s NYC Aquarium & Public Waterfront design competition
Building Team Awards | May 24, 2016
Los Angeles bus depot squeezes the most from a tight site
The Building Team for the MTA Division 13 Bus Operations and Maintenance Facility fit 12 acres’ worth of programming in a multi-level structure on a 4.8-acre site.
Building Team Awards | May 23, 2016
'Greenest ballpark' proves a winner for St. Paul Saints
Solar arrays, a public art courtyard, and a picnic-friendly “park within a park" make the 7,210-seat CHS Field the first ballpark to meet Minnesota sustainable building standards.
Building Team Awards | May 19, 2016
Chinatown library unites and serves two emerging Chicago neighborhoods
The 16,000-sf, pebble-shaped Chinatown Branch Library was built at the intersection of new and old Chinatown neighborhoods. The goal is for the building to unite the communities and serve as a catalyst for the developing area.
Building Team Awards | May 19, 2016
NYC subway station lights the way for 300,000 riders a day
Fulton Center, which handles 85% of the riders coming to Lower Manhattan, is like no other station in the city’s vast underground transit web—and that’s a good thing.
Market Data | May 17, 2016
Modest growth for AIA’s Architecture Billings Index in April
The American Institute of Architects reported the April ABI score was 50.6, down from the mark of 51.9 in the previous month. This score still reflects an increase in design services.
Retail Centers | May 10, 2016
5 factors guiding restaurant design
Restaurants are more than just places to eat. They are comprising town centers and playing into the future of brick-and-mortar retail.
AEC Tech | May 9, 2016
Is the nation’s grand tech boom really an innovation funk?
Despite popular belief, the country is not in a great age of technological and digital innovation, at least when compared to the last great innovation era (1870-1970).
