| Rank | Company | 2012 Healthcare Revenue ($) |
| 1 | AECOM Technology Corp. | $180,210,000 |
| 2 | Jacobs Engineering Group | $77,100,000 |
| 3 | URS Corp. | $43,327,332 |
| 4 | Smith Seckman Reid | $40,105,600 |
| 5 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | $30,000,000 |
| 6 | Affiliated Engineers | $28,217,000 |
| 7 | TTG | $24,719,905 |
| 8 | Parsons Brinckerhoff | $22,700,000 |
| 9 | Dewberry | $21,226,702 |
| 10 | Allen & Shariff | $20,300,000 |
| 11 | Bard, Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers | $19,000,000 |
| 12 | KJWW Engineering Consultants | $18,937,680 |
| 13 | Mazzetti | $18,293,579 |
| 14 | Degenkolb Engineers | $18,070,782 |
| 15 | CCRD Partners | $18,000,000 |
| 16 | Burns & McDonnell | $16,375,000 |
| 17 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $13,500,933 |
| 18 | Syska Hennessy Group | $11,495,282 |
| 19 | AKF Group | $10,770,000 |
| 20 | Arup | $9,244,250 |
| 21 | Shive-Hattery | $8,381,840 |
| 22 | Heapy Engineering | $8,159,633 |
| 23 | Zak Companies | $7,640,496 |
| 24 | M-E Engineers | $7,200,000 |
| 24 | RMF Engineering Design | $7,200,000 |
| 26 | Thornton Tomasetti | $6,858,953 |
| 27 | Sparling | $6,768,165 |
| 28 | Buro Happold Consulting Engineers | $6,520,000 |
| 29 | Rolf Jensen & Associates | $6,400,000 |
| 30 | Walter P Moore | $6,232,472 |
| 31 | Michael Baker Jr. | $6,200,000 |
| 32 | SSOE Group | $6,192,909 |
| 33 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | $5,700,000 |
| 34 | M/E Engineering | $5,671,750 |
| 35 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | $5,390,000 |
| 36 | Dunham Associates | $5,000,000 |
| 37 | Vanderweil Engineers | $4,846,600 |
| 38 | Interface Engineering | $4,633,068 |
| 39 | RDK Engineers | $4,572,000 |
| 40 | Karpinski Engineering | $4,438,224 |
| 41 | Clark Nexsen | $4,167,051 |
| 42 | Peter Basso Associates | $4,066,000 |
| 43 | Aon Fire Protection Engineering | $4,000,728 |
| 44 | H.F. Lenz | $3,983,000 |
| 45 | Newcomb & Boyd | $3,942,400 |
| 46 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $3,879,844 |
| 47 | STV | $3,735,000 |
| 48 | Walker Parking Consultants | $3,719,693 |
| 49 | Science Applications International Corp. | $3,621,708 |
| 50 | Eaton Energy Solutions | $3,502,239 |
| 51 | KCI Technologies | $3,500,000 |
| 52 | Coffman Engineers | $3,350,000 |
| 53 | Spectrum Engineers | $3,338,950 |
| 54 | Glumac | $3,296,000 |
| 55 | WSP USA | $2,411,684 |
| 56 | CJL Engineering | $2,390,686 |
| 57 | Environmental Systems Design | $2,383,822 |
| 58 | KLH Engineers | $2,100,000 |
| 59 | Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering | $2,000,000 |
| 60 | Apogee Consulting Group | $1,582,000 |
| 61 | Ross & Baruzzini | $1,505,511 |
| 62 | Henderson Engineers | $1,469,261 |
| 63 | Brinjac Engineering | $1,367,836 |
| 64 | GRAEF | $1,335,473 |
| 65 | ThermalTech Engineering | $1,300,000 |
| 66 | Haynes Whaley Associates | $1,226,927 |
| 67 | Bergmann Associates | $1,177,000 |
| 68 | Wick Fisher White | $1,137,773 |
| 69 | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | $1,053,699 |
| 70 | Bala Consulting Engineers | $850,000 |
| 71 | OLA Consulting Engineers | $750,000 |
| 72 | CTLGroup | $700,000 |
| 72 | French & Parrello Associates | $700,000 |
| 74 | Primera Engineers | $620,000 |
| 75 | FBA Engineering | $400,000 |
| 76 | Joseph R. Loring & Associates | $280,000 |
| 77 | G&W Engineering | $232,000 |
| 78 | Wallace Engineering | $225,000 |
| 79 | Stanley Consultants | $219,880 |
| 80 | Davis, Bowen & Friedel | $187,632 |
| 81 | Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor | $150,000 |
| 82 | P2S Engineering | $76,079 |
| 83 | Total Building Commissioning | $46,144 |
| 84 | Kamm Consulting | $21,025 |
| 85 | Guernsey | $11,668 |
Read the Healthcare Giants article
Read BD+C's full Giants 300 Report
Related Stories
Engineers | Jan 12, 2022
Private equity: An increasingly attractive alternative for AEC firm sellers
Private equity firms active in the AEC sector work quietly in the background to partner with management, hold for longer periods, and build a win-win for investors and the firm. At a minimum, AEC firms contemplating ownership transition should consider private equity as a viable option. Here is why.
Sponsored | BD+C University Course | Jan 12, 2022
Total steel project performance
This instructor-led video course discusses actual project scenarios where collaborative steel joist and deck design have reduced total-project costs. In an era when incomplete structural drawings are a growing concern for our industry, the course reveals hidden costs and risks that can be avoided.
University Buildings | Jan 11, 2022
Designing for health sciences education: supporting student well-being
While student and faculty health and well-being should be a top priority in all spaces within educational facilities, this article will highlight some key considerations.
Green | Jan 10, 2022
The future of regenerative building is performance-based
Why measuring performance results is so critical, but also easier said than done.
Senior Living Design | Jan 5, 2022
Top Senior Living Facility Design and Construction Firms
Perkins Eastman, Kimley-Horn, WSP USA, Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., and Ryan Companies US top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest senior living sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2021 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Jan 3, 2022
2021 Government Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. government buildings sector
Stantec, Jacobs, Turner Construction, and Hensel Phelps top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest government sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2021 Giants 400 Report.
Architects | Dec 20, 2021
Digital nomads are influencing design
As our spaces continue to adapt to our future needs, we’ll likely see more collaborative, communal zones where people can relax, shop, and work.
Urban Planning | Dec 15, 2021
EV is the bridge to transit’s AV revolution—and now is the time to start building it
Thinking holistically about a technology-enabled customer experience will make transit a mode of choice for more people.
Healthcare Facilities | Dec 15, 2021
COVID-19 has altered the speed and design of healthcare projects, perhaps irrevocably
Healthcare clients want their projects up and running quicker, a task made more complicated by the shortage of skilled labor in many markets.
Healthcare Facilities | Dec 15, 2021
MEP design considerations for rural hospitals
Rural hospitals present unique opportunities and challenges for healthcare facility operators. Oftentimes, the infrastructure and building systems have not been updated for years and require significant improvements in order to meet today’s modern medical demands. Additionally, as these smaller, more remote hospitals are acquired by larger regional and national healthcare systems, the first step by new ownership is often to update and rehabilitate the building. But how can this be done thoughtfully, economically, and efficiently in ways that allow the engineering and facility staff to adapt to the changes? And how can the updates accurately reflect the specific needs of rural communities and the afflictions with which these areas most commonly face?
