| Rank | Company | 2012 Data Center Revenue ($) |
| 1 | DPR Construction | $895,882,459 |
| 2 | Balfour Beatty | $753,194,214 |
| 3 | Holder Construction | $710,000,000 |
| 4 | Turner Corporation, The | $501,750,000 |
| 5 | Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., The | $490,093,045 |
| 6 | Mortenson Construction | $307,360,000 |
| 7 | Structure Tone | $285,725,000 |
| 8 | Skanska USA | $236,396,858 |
| 9 | Gilbane | $130,362,000 |
| 10 | Carlson Design Construct | $128,000,000 |
| 11 | JE Dunn Construction | $115,317,147 |
| 12 | Hoffman Construction | $94,000,000 |
| 13 | James G Davis Construction | $50,000,000 |
| 14 | HITT Contracting | $49,606,628 |
| 15 | Weitz Co., The | $48,030,731 |
| 16 | Hensel Phelps | $34,880,000 |
| 17 | Messer Construction | $26,143,179 |
| 18 | Austin Commercial | $22,599,445 |
| 19 | Sundt Construction | $20,870,058 |
| 20 | Harkins Builders | $19,900,000 |
| 21 | McGough | $18,480,000 |
| 22 | Ryan Companies US | $17,262,271 |
| 23 | Yates Cos., The | $16,000,000 |
| 24 | Brasfield & Gorrie | $14,174,449 |
| 25 | W. M. Jordan Co. | $13,507,310 |
| 26 | Lend Lease | $12,904,000 |
| 27 | Tutor Perini Corporation | $6,527,200 |
| 28 | Coakley & Williams Construction | $4,877,023 |
| 29 | Flintco | $4,200,000 |
| 30 | Walsh Group, The | $4,016,629 |
| 31 | O'Neil Industries/W.E. O'Neil | $3,670,581 |
| 32 | ECC | $2,926,047 |
| 33 | Layton Construction | $2,700,000 |
| 34 | Kraus-Anderson Construction | $2,000,000 |
| 35 | Jones Lang LaSalle | $1,813,600 |
| 36 | Suffolk Construction | $406,158 |
| 37 | Clark Group | $348,371 |
| 38 | Stalco Construction | $200,000 |
Read the Data Center Giants article
Read BD+C's full Giants 300 Report
Related Stories
| Jul 22, 2013
International Report [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Building Design+Construction's rankings of design and construction firms with the most revenue from international projects, as reported in the 2013 Giants 300 Report.
| Jul 22, 2013
Suffolk Construction launches fall 2013 subcontractor development series
Successful program to provide disadvantaged, minority, and women-owned subcontractor firms valuable insight on partnering with area’s largest general contractor
| Jul 19, 2013
Top BIM Construction Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Turner, Clark Group, DPR top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the contractors and construction management firms with the most revenue from BIM-driven projects.
| Jul 19, 2013
Top BIM Engineering Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Jacobs, URS, SAIC top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the engineering and engineering/architecture firms with the most revenue from BIM-driven projects.
| Jul 19, 2013
Top BIM Architecture Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Gensler, HOK, HDR top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the architecture and architecture/engineering firms with the most revenue from BIM-driven projects.
| Jul 19, 2013
BIM 2.0: AEC firms share their vision for the great leap forward in BIM/VDC implementation [2013 Giants 300 Report]
We reached out to dozens of AEC firms that made our annual BIM Giants lists and asked one simple question: What does BIM 2.0 look like to you? Here’s what they had to offer.
| Jul 19, 2013
Reconstruction Sector Construction Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Structure Tone, DPR, Gilbane top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest reconstruction contractor and construction management firms in the U.S.
| Jul 19, 2013
Reconstruction Sector Engineering Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]
URS, STV, Wiss Janney Elstner top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest reconstruction engineering and engineering/architecture firms in the U.S.
| Jul 19, 2013
Reconstruction Sector Architecture Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Stantec, HOK, HDR top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest reconstruction architecture and architecture/engineering firms in the U.S.
| Jul 19, 2013
Renovation, adaptive reuse stay strong, providing fertile ground for growth [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Increasingly, owners recognize that existing buildings represent a considerable resource in embodied energy, which can often be leveraged for lower front-end costs and a faster turnaround than new construction.
