| Rank | Company | 2012 BIM Revenue ($) |
| 1 | Turner Corporation, The | $5,924,000,000 |
| 2 | Clark Group | $2,224,508,127 |
| 3 | DPR Construction | $2,175,000,000 |
| 4 | Hoffman Construction | $2,155,377,276 |
| 5 | Hensel Phelps | $2,089,180,000 |
| 6 | Mortenson Construction | $1,992,450,000 |
| 7 | Balfour Beatty | $1,902,988,332 |
| 8 | McCarthy Holdings | $1,879,000,000 |
| 9 | JE Dunn Construction | $1,513,283,005 |
| 10 | Walsh Group, The | $1,313,656,333 |
| 11 | Lend Lease | $1,218,122,000 |
| 12 | PCL Construction Enterprises | $1,213,156,585 |
| 13 | Holder Construction | $1,019,000,000 |
| 14 | Structure Tone | $923,829,900 |
| 15 | Swinerton Builders | $915,070,800 |
| 16 | Clayco | $872,000,000 |
| 17 | Austin Commercial | $868,955,572 |
| 18 | Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., The | $868,573,404 |
| 19 | Walbridge | $839,182,500 |
| 20 | Suffolk Construction | $834,511,728 |
| 21 | Hunt Construction Group | $810,500,000 |
| 22 | Brasfield & Gorrie | $684,493,359 |
| 23 | Gilbane | $523,064,000 |
| 24 | Messer Construction | $513,538,062 |
| 25 | Weitz Co., The | $513,360,000 |
| 26 | Manhattan Construction | $497,216,000 |
| 27 | James G Davis Construction | $475,000,000 |
| 28 | Pepper Construction Group | $464,990,000 |
| 29 | Power Construction | $450,000,000 |
| 30 | Robins & Morton | $401,650,000 |
| 31 | Ryan Companies US | $386,798,862 |
| 32 | C.W. Driver | $382,694,559 |
| 33 | LPCiminelli | $348,491,000 |
| 34 | Sundt Construction | $338,075,234 |
| 35 | Hoar Construction | $320,216,000 |
| 36 | Shawmut Design and Construction | $310,000,000 |
| 37 | W. M. Jordan Co. | $279,491,524 |
| 38 | Flintco | $279,360,000 |
| 39 | Consigli Construction | $270,606,369 |
| 40 | McGough | $267,000,000 |
| 41 | Linbeck Group | $244,000,000 |
| 42 | Rodgers Builders | $225,582,000 |
| 43 | James McHugh Construction | $219,451,000 |
| 44 | Barton Malow | $208,300,466 |
| 45 | Boldt Company, The | $170,000,000 |
| 46 | HITT Contracting | $165,000,000 |
| 47 | O'Neil Industries/W.E. O'Neil | $161,924,537 |
| 48 | Yates Cos., The | $149,600,000 |
| 49 | Kraus-Anderson Construction | $140,000,000 |
| 50 | Gray | $136,428,850 |
| 51 | Hill & Wilkinson General Contractors | $120,193,073 |
| 52 | Alberici Constructors | $115,326,844 |
| 53 | Coakley & Williams Construction | $91,368,701 |
| 54 | EMJ | $83,196,377 |
| 55 | Batson-Cook | $75,554,514 |
| 56 | Clancy & Theys Construction | $70,000,000 |
| 57 | Carlson Design Construct | $65,000,000 |
| 58 | ECC | $54,582,771 |
| 59 | Absher Construction | $45,100,000 |
| 60 | CORE Construction Group | $38,303,417 |
| 61 | New South Construction | $35,970,000 |
| 62 | KBE Building Corporation | $30,365,655 |
| 63 | Harkins Builders | $14,400,000 |
| 64 | Bomel Construction | $10,700,000 |
| 65 | E.W. Howell | $5,040,000 |
| 66 | S. M. Wilson & Co. | $4,399,663 |
| 67 | Doster Construction | $4,183,908 |
| 68 | Stalco Construction | $3,100,000 |
| 69 | Jones Lang LaSalle | $2,989,600 |
| 70 | Choate Construction | $64,657 |
Back to BIM Giants article
Read the full 2013 Giants 300 Report
Related Stories
Designers | Jan 8, 2024
DLR Group adds executive leaders
DLR Group Chief Executive Officer Steven McKay, AIA, RIBA, announced new executive leaders for the 100% employee-owned, globally integrated design firm.
AEC Tech | Jan 8, 2024
What's driving the surge of digital transformation in AEC today?
For centuries, the AEC industry has clung to traditional methods and legacy processes—seated patterns that have bred resistance to change. This has made the adoption of new technologies a slow and hesitant process.
K-12 Schools | Jan 8, 2024
Video: Learn how DLR Group converted two big-box stores into an early education center
Learn how the North Kansas City (Mo.) School District and DLR Group adapted two big-box stores into a 115,000-sf early education center offering services for children with special needs.
Green | Jan 8, 2024
DOE releases RFI on developing national definition for a Zero Emissions Building
The Department of Energy released a Request for Information (RFI) for feedback from industry, academia, research laboratories, government agencies, and other stakeholders on a draft national definition for a Zero Emissions Building.
Codes and Standards | Jan 8, 2024
Australia to be first country to ban engineered stone countertops
In 2024, Australia will be the first country to ban engineered stone countertops. The ban came after a years-long campaign supported by doctors, trade unions, and workers over concerns that the material was causing increased silicosis cases among workers cutting and handling it.
Roofing | Jan 8, 2024
Researchers devise adaptive roof tile concept that adjusts to ambient temperatures
Scientists at the University of California Santa Barbara published a paper that proposes adaptive roof tile technology that can adjust to ambient temperatures. Using a wax motor, tiles could switch from a heating or cooling state enabling savings on heating and cooling costs.
MFPRO+ News | Jan 4, 2024
Bjarke Ingels's curved residential high-rise will anchor a massive urban regeneration project in Greece
In Athens, Greece, Lamda Development has launched Little Athens, the newest residential neighborhood at the Ellinikon, a multiuse development billed as a smart city. Bjarke Ingels Group's 50-meter Park Rise building will serve as Little Athens’ centerpiece.
MFPRO+ Special Reports | Jan 4, 2024
Top 10 trends in multifamily rental housing
Demographic and economic shifts, along with work and lifestyle changes, have made apartment living preferable for a wider range of buyers and renters. These top 10 trends in multifamily housing come from BD+C's 2023 Multifamily Annual Report.
Giants 400 | Jan 3, 2024
Top 200 Reconstruction Architecture Firms for 2023
Gensler, Stantec, HDR, Corgan, and PBK Architects top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest building reconstruction/renovation architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.
Designers | Jan 3, 2024
Designing better built environments for a neurodiverse world
For most of human history, design has mostly considered “typical users” who are fully able-bodied without clinical or emotional disabilities. The problem with this approach is that it offers a limited perspective on how space can positively or negatively influence someone based on their physical, mental, and sensory abilities.
