| TOP 70 UNIVERSITY ENGINEERING FIRMS | ||
| Rank | Firm | 2015 Revenue |
| 1 | AECOM | $65,000,000 |
| 2 | WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff | $37,988,000 |
| 3 | Jacobs | $31,600,000 |
| 4 | Affiliated Engineers | $19,264,000 |
| 5 | KJWW / TTG | $16,943,913 |
| 6 | Arup | $15,856,593 |
| 7 | Vanderweil Engineers | $15,351,800 |
| 8 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | $13,586,000 |
| 9 | Thornton Tomasetti | $13,363,234 |
| 10 | Dewberry | $12,904,401 |
| 11 | BR+A Consulting Engineers | $11,400,000 |
| 12 | RMF Engineering | $11,354,900 |
| 13 | Burns & McDonnell | $11,116,604 |
| 14 | BSA LifeStructures | $10,770,801 |
| 15 | P2S Engineering | $10,557,369 |
| 16 | Shive-Hattery | $8,288,709 |
| 17 | Jensen Hughes | $7,740,346 |
| 18 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | $7,740,000 |
| 19 | Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber | $7,500,000 |
| 20 | ME Engineers | $6,460,000 |
| 21 | Loring Consulting Engineers | $6,036,000 |
| 22 | H.F. Lenz Company | $4,944,856 |
| 23 | Interface Engineering | $4,794,573 |
| 24 | M/E Engineering | $4,688,355 |
| 25 | Ross & Baruzzini | $4,307,200 |
| 26 | Heapy Engineering | $4,160,676 |
| 27 | STV | $4,002,342 |
| 28 | RDK Engineers | $3,875,821 |
| 29 | Glumac | $3,696,480 |
| 30 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $3,491,531 |
| 31 | Woolpert | $3,243,901 |
| 32 | JQ Engineering | $3,141,800 |
| 33 | Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering | $3,000,000 |
| 34 | Spectrum Engineers | $2,971,807 |
| 35 | Karpinski Engineering | $2,932,833 |
| 36 | Smith Seckman Reid | $2,842,841 |
| 37 | Peter Basso Associates | $2,780,856 |
| 38 | Global Engineering Solutions | $2,620,000 |
| 39 | Stanley Consultants | $2,463,846 |
| 40 | Newcomb & Boyd | $2,448,645 |
| 41 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $2,427,726 |
| 42 | Henderson Engineers | $2,347,476 |
| 43 | Primera Engineers | $2,171,401 |
| 44 | Environmental Systems Design | $2,095,786 |
| 45 | KCI Technologies | $2,000,000 |
| 46 | I. C. Thomasson Associates | $1,928,200 |
| 47 | dbHMS | $1,920,000 |
| 48 | Bala Consulting Engineers | $1,880,000 |
| 49 | Dunham Associates | $1,750,000 |
| 50 | Highland Associates | $1,700,000 |
| 51 | CJL Engineering, Inc. | $1,510,260 |
| 52 | Cardno Haynes Whaley | $1,483,543 |
| 53 | Syska Hennessy Group | $1,445,519 |
| 54 | Graef | $1,357,546 |
| 55 | DeSimone Consulting Engineers | $1,305,742 |
| 56 | Wallace Engineering | $1,300,000 |
| 57 | KZF Design | $1,074,055 |
| 58 | Luckett & Farley | $1,069,453 |
| 59 | William Tao & Associates | $946,168 |
| 60 | KLH Engineers | $860,386 |
| 61 | Baird, Hampton & Brown | $841,665 |
| 62 | Mazzetti | $817,330 |
| 63 | CTLGroup | $800,000 |
| 64 | Ghafari Associates | $750,000 |
| 65 | Wendel | $745,424 |
| 66 | OLA Consulting Engineers | $672,728 |
| 67 | JBA Consulting Engineers | $668,293 |
| 68 | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | $626,415 |
| 69 | SSOE Group | $520,000 |
| 70 | ThermalTech Engineering | $500,000 |
RETURN TO THE GIANTS 300 LANDING PAGE
Related Stories
| Jan 10, 2011
Michael J. Alter, president of The Alter Group: ‘There’s a significant pent-up demand for projects’
Michael J. Alter, president of The Alter Group, a national corporate real estate development firm headquartered in Skokie, Ill., on the growth of urban centers, project financing, and what clients are saying about sustainability.
| Jan 7, 2011
BIM on Target
By using BIM for the design of its new San Clemente, Calif., store, big-box retailer Target has been able to model the entire structural steel package, including joists, in 3D, chopping the timeline for shop drawings from as much as 10 weeks down to an ‘unheard of’ three-and-a-half weeks.
| Jan 7, 2011
How Building Teams Choose Roofing Systems
A roofing survey emailed to a representative sample of BD+C’s subscriber list revealed such key findings as: Respondents named metal (56%) and EPDM (50%) as the roofing systems they (or their firms) employed most in projects. Also, new construction and retrofits were fairly evenly split among respondents’ roofing-related projects over the last couple of years.
| Jan 7, 2011
Total construction to rise 5.1% in 2011
Total U.S. construction spending will increase 5.1% in 2011. The gain from the end of 2010 to the end of 2011 will be 10%. The biggest annual gain in 2011 will be 10% for new residential construction, far above the 2-3% gains in all other construction sectors.
| Jan 7, 2011
Mixed-Use on Steroids
Mixed-use development has been one of the few bright spots in real estate in the last few years. Successful mixed-use projects are almost always located in dense urban or suburban areas, usually close to public transportation. It’s a sign of the times that the residential component tends to be rental rather than for-sale.
| Jan 4, 2011
Product of the Week: Zinc cladding helps border crossing blend in with surroundings
Zinc panels provide natural-looking, durable cladding for an administrative building and toll canopies at the newly expanded Queenstown Plaza U.S.-Canada border crossing at the Niagara Gorge. Toronto’s Moriyama & Teshima Architects chose the zinc alloy panels for their ability to blend with the structures’ scenic surroundings, as well as for their low maintenance and sustainable qualities. The structures incorporate 14,000 sf of Rheinzink’s branded Angled Standing Seam and Reveal Panels in graphite gray.
| Jan 4, 2011
6 green building trends to watch in 2011
According to a report by New York-based JWT Intelligence, there are six key green building trends to watch in 2011, including: 3D printing, biomimicry, and more transparent and accurate green claims.
| Jan 4, 2011
LEED standards under fire in NYC
This year, for the first time, owners of 25,000 commercial properties in New York must report their buildings’ energy use to the city. However, LEED doesn’t measure energy use and costs, something a growing number of engineers, architects, and landlords insist must be done. Their concerns and a general blossoming of environmental awareness have spawned a host of rating systems that could test LEED’s dominance.
| Jan 4, 2011
LEED 2012: 10 changes you should know about
The USGBC is beginning its review and planning for the next version of LEED—LEED 2012. The draft version of LEED 2012 is currently in the first of at least two public comment periods, and it’s important to take a look at proposed changes to see the direction USGBC is taking, the plans they have for LEED, and—most importantly—how they affect you.
