![Top 70 Green Building Engineering + EA Firms [2018 Giants 300 Report]](/sites/default/files/GREEN%20ENG.jpg "Top 70 Green Building Engineering + EA Firms [2018 Giants 300 Report]")
| TOP 70 GREEN BUILDING ENGINEERING + EA FIRMS | ||
| RANK | COMPANY | 2017 GREEN BUILDING REVENUE |
| 1 | AECOM | $310,000,000 |
| — | Jacobs | $310,000,000 |
| 3 | Arup | $207,249,382 |
| 4 | WSP | $93,986,000 |
| 5 | Thornton Tomasetti | $79,500,000 |
| 6 | ESD | $60,269,001 |
| 7 | Burns & McDonnell | $58,171,940 |
| 8 | Affiliated Engineers | $37,287,380 |
| 9 | Syska Hennessy Group | $26,503,433 |
| 10 | Dewberry | $24,488,842 |
| 11 | Smith Seckman Reid | $23,473,605 |
| 12 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | $21,000,000 |
| 13 | Vanderweil Engineers | $19,375,200 |
| 14 | DeSimone Consulting Engineers | $16,470,911 |
| 15 | Walter P Moore | $15,363,551 |
| 16 | Interface Engineering | $9,999,511 |
| 17 | RMF Engineering | $8,775,000 |
| 18 | Mason & Hanger | $8,641,838 |
| 19 | IMEG Corp. | $7,660,000 |
| 20 | Setty | $7,585,612 |
| 21 | Bala Consulting Engineers | $7,500,000 |
| 22 | Ross & Baruzzini | $6,750,000 |
| 23 | Heapy Engineering | $6,447,639 |
| 24 | STV | $6,288,389 |
| 25 | Ghafari Associates | $5,800,000 |
| 26 | GHT Ltd. | $5,720,750 |
| 27 | Newcomb & Boyd | $5,470,615 |
| 28 | dbHMS | $5,200,000 |
| 29 | Global Engineering Solutions | $5,200,000 |
| 30 | Jaros, Baum & Bolles | $5,063,625 |
| 31 | TEECOM | $4,685,667 |
| 32 | KCI Technologies | $4,000,000 |
| 33 | Arora Engineers | $3,793,057 |
| 34 | M/E Engineering | $3,779,400 |
| 35 | P2S | $3,747,213 |
| 36 | Spectrum Engineers | $3,672,386 |
| 37 | Peter Basso Associates | $3,265,000 |
| 38 | PS&S | $3,232,000 |
| 39 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $3,077,443 |
| 40 | BRPH | $3,073,909 |
| 41 | Loring Consulting Engineers | $3,000,000 |
| 42 | Sherlock, Smith & Adams | $2,983,000 |
| 43 | OLA Consulting Engineers | $2,565,000 |
| 44 | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | $2,451,226 |
| 45 | JQ Engineering | $2,364,000 |
| 46 | Kohler Ronan | $2,232,491 |
| 47 | PBS Engineers | $2,000,000 |
| 48 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $1,550,000 |
| 49 | Schaefer | $1,500,000 |
| 50 | Morrison Hershfield | $1,467,703 |
| 51 | AKF Group | $1,400,000 |
| 52 | H.F. Lenz | $1,391,260 |
| 53 | CJL Engineering | $1,187,500 |
| 54 | Core States Group | $1,000,000 |
| 55 | Primera Engineers | $939,676 |
| 56 | PEDCO E&A Services | $830,000 |
| 57 | G & W Engineering | $800,000 |
| 58 | French & Parrello Associates | $650,000 |
| 59 | Thompson Consulting Engineers | $629,183 |
| 60 | Integrated Design Group | $600,000 |
| 61 | NV5 Global | $581,383 |
| 62 | Architectural Engineers | $445,298 |
| 63 | Woolpert | $385,000 |
| 64 | Wick Fisher White | $294,000 |
| 65 | Dunham Associates | $275,000 |
| 66 | RTM Engineering Consultants | $123,875 |
| 67 | I.C. Thomasson Associates | $112,250 |
| 68 | ThermalTech Engineering | $50,000 |
| 69 | DWL Architects + Planners | $34,240 |
| 70 | Davis, Bowen & Friedel | $29,138 |
| 71 | Stanley Consultants | $19,000 |
Source: BD+C's 2018 Giants 300 Report
BACK TO 2018 GIANTS 300 REPORT LANDING PAGE
Related Stories
| Aug 30, 2016
CONVENTION CENTER GIANTS: A ranking of the nation's top convention center sector design and construction firms
Gensler, LMN Architects, AECOM, Turner Construction Co., and WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest convention center sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
BIM and Information Technology | Aug 30, 2016
BIM GIANTS: A ranking of the nation's top BIM design and construction firms
HOK, Perkins+Will, Turner Construction Co., The Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., Jacobs, and Thornton Tomasetti top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest BIM AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 19, 2016
RECONSTRUCTION GIANTS: Facelifts give buildings new identities, even as they keep a few wrinkles
Reconstruction is always a balancing act between the client’s pro forma and what the building needs to be vibrant again.
| Aug 19, 2016
Top 70 Reconstruction Engineering Firms
Jacobs, Robins & Morton, and The Boldt Company top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest reconstruction sector engineering and E/A firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 19, 2016
Top 110 Reconstruction Construction Firms
Gilbane Building Co., Turner Construction Co., and The Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest reconstruction sector construction and construction management firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 19, 2016
Top 130 Reconstruction Architecture Firms
The Beck Group, Stantec, and IMC Consruction top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest reconstruction sector architecture and A/E firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 18, 2016
LOCAL GOVERNMENT GIANTS: A ranking of the nation’s top design and construction firms in local sector work
HOK, Stantec, Turner Construction Co.,Clark Group, AECOM and STV top Building Design+Construction’s annual rankings of the nation’s largest local government sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 18, 2016
STATE GOVERNMENT GIANTS: A ranking of the nation’s top design and construction firms in state sector work
CannonDesign, Stantec, Turner Construction Co.,Mortensen Construction, WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff and AECOM top Building Design+Construction’s annual rankings of the nation’s largest state government sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 18, 2016
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GIANTS: A ranking of the nation’s top design and construction firms in federal sector work
Page, EYP, Fluor Corp.,BL Harbert International, and AECOM top Building Design+Construction’s annual rankings of the nation’s largest federal government sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 15, 2016
SPORTS FACILITY GIANTS: New and renovated college sports venues - designed to serve students and the community
Schools are renovating existing structures or building new sports facilities that can serve the student body and surrounding community.
