| TOP 60 K-12 SCHOOL ENGINEERING FIRMS | ||
| Rank | Firm | 2015 Revenue |
| 1 | AECOM | $50,000,000 |
| 2 | Jacobs | $47,790,000 |
| 3 | STV | $10,618,628 |
| 4 | KJWW / TTG | $9,576,078 |
| 5 | Wendel | $6,321,646 |
| 6 | Loring Consulting Engineers | $6,000,000 |
| 7 | SSOE Group | $5,830,000 |
| 8 | Dewberry | $5,245,499 |
| 9 | KCI Technologies | $5,000,000 |
| 10 | M/E Engineering | $4,688,355 |
| 11 | Interface Engineering | $4,648,596 |
| 12 | Shive-Hattery | $4,444,746 |
| 13 | Walter P Moore | $4,383,887 |
| 14 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | $3,820,000 |
| 15 | Coffman Engineers | $3,477,402 |
| 16 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $3,463,318 |
| 17 | Global Engineering Solutions | $3,275,000 |
| 18 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | $2,655,000 |
| 19 | Henderson Engineers | $2,609,752 |
| 20 | Bala Consulting Engineers | $2,585,000 |
| 21 | H.F. Lenz Company | $1,939,675 |
| 22 | Glumac | $1,864,154 |
| 23 | KCL Engineering | $1,799,671 |
| 24 | Heapy Engineering | $1,625,957 |
| 25 | Peter Basso Associates | $1,584,834 |
| 26 | RMF Engineering | $1,466,500 |
| 27 | Thornton Tomasetti | $1,398,507 |
| 28 | Highland Associates | $1,300,000 |
| 29 | JQ Engineering | $1,251,500 |
| 30 | Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber | $1,200,000 |
| 31 | Vanderweil Engineers | $1,087,600 |
| 32 | CJL Engineering, Inc. | $1,080,744 |
| 33 | I. C. Thomasson Associates | $1,057,400 |
| 34 | RDK Engineers | $1,016,785 |
| 35 | Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering | $1,000,000 |
| 36 | Karpinski Engineering | $1,000,000 |
| 37 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $960,783 |
| 38 | P2S Engineering | $891,407 |
| 39 | Graef | $845,962 |
| 40 | Baird, Hampton & Brown | $824,059 |
| 41 | OLA Consulting Engineers | $800,034 |
| 42 | William Tao & Associates | $756,935 |
| 43 | JBA Consulting Engineers | $650,667 |
| 44 | KLH Engineers | $604,408 |
| 45 | KZF Design | $592,946 |
| 46 | Primera Engineers | $547,143 |
| 47 | dbHMS | $537,600 |
| 48 | Wallace Engineering | $500,000 |
| 49 | ME Engineers | $500,000 |
| 50 | Newcomb & Boyd | $427,804 |
| 51 | Davis, Bowen & Friedel | $414,817 |
| 52 | Architectural Engineers | $394,865 |
| 53 | G & W Engineering Corp. | $350,090 |
| 54 | Cardno Haynes Whaley | $323,309 |
| 55 | Spectrum Engineers | $141,327 |
| 56 | CTLGroup | $100,000 |
| 57 | Dunham Associates | $100,000 |
| 58 | GHT Limited | $100,000 |
| 59 | Apogee Consulting Group | $70,000 |
| 60 | Zak Companies | $50,807 |
| 61 | Ghafari Associates | $50,000 |
| 62 | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | $20,143 |
| 63 | Sherlock, Smith & Adams | $7,000 |
| 64 | Luckett & Farley | $3,703 |
RETURN TO THE GIANTS 300 LANDING PAGE
Related Stories
Sponsored | | Jun 30, 2013
Get your 'Early Bird' entry in for BD+C 30th Annual Reconstruction Awards
The deadline is for BD+C's 30th Annual Reconstruction Awards is July 19, but if you get me a draft of your entry by July 12 (earlier if possible, please!), we'll read it and give you feedback and suggestions that could help you win. We'll give you enough time to rework your entry in time to meet the deadline. We do this "Early Bird" service to help you put together the best possible entry - one that will answer any questions our distinguished jury members may come up with. However, we must emphasize that the BD+C Reconstruction Awards program is a juried competition, so there are no guarantees you'll win. We're just trying to improve your odds. Building Design+Construction is the only publication in its field to recognize the importance of reconstruction in all its forms - historic preservation, adaptive reuse, renovation, fitouts, and reconstruction with addition. And we've been doing it for 30 years. Incidentally, reconstruction accounts for 30-35% of all revenue for AEC firms, so it's a key component of the US/Canada design and construction industry. Send your draft entry to: rcassidy@sgcmail.com. And good luck!
| Jun 28, 2013
Calculating the ROI of building enclosure commissioning
A researcher at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory calls building enclosure commissioning “the single-most cost-effective strategy for reducing energy, costs, and greenhouse gas emissions in buildings today.”
| Jun 28, 2013
A brief history of windows in America
Historic window experts from Hoffmann Architects look back at the origin of windows in the U.S.
| Jun 28, 2013
Building owners cite BIM/VDC as 'most exciting trend' in facilities management, says Mortenson report
A recent survey of more than 60 building owners and facility management professionals by Mortenson Construction shows that BIM/VDC is top of mind among owner professionals.
| Jun 27, 2013
Thermal, solar control designs can impact cooling loads by 200%, heating loads by 30%
Underestimating thermal bridging can greatly undermine a building’s performance contributing to heating load variances of up to 30% and cooling load variances of up to 200%, says the MMM Group.
| Jun 26, 2013
New York’s ‘Scaffold Law’ may be altered to place larger burden on workers
New York's Scaffold Law, which “places the burden of responsibility on the contractor to prove that the job site was safe for workers,” could be facing a major change.
| Jun 26, 2013
Commercial real estate execs eye multifamily, retail sectors for growth, says KPMG report
The multifamily, retail, and hospitality sectors are expected to lead commercial building growth, according to the 2013 KPMG Commercial Real Estate Outlook Survey.
| Jun 25, 2013
Mirvish, Gehry revise plans for triad of Toronto towers
A trio of mixed-use towers planned for an urban redevelopment project in Toronto has been redesigned by planners David Mirvish and Frank Gehry. The plan was announced last October but has recently been substantially revised.
| Jun 25, 2013
First look: Herzog & de Meuron's Jade Signature condo tower in Florida
Real estate developer Fortune International has released details of its new Jade Signature property, to be developed in Sunny Isles Beach near Miami. The luxury waterfront condo building will include 192 units in a 57-story building near high-end retail destinations and cultural venues.
| Jun 20, 2013
In a BIM world, how much information is too much information?
What information do you find valuable to keep within the BIM world and what information do you feel is best archived or referenced outside of the model itself?
